Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By A. L. Benhenni | November 9th 2009 05:25 PM | 2 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More Taming the Divergences articles

All

About A. L. Benhenni

Studying physics (as a PhD student in particle physics and supersymmetry phenomenology) led me to ask a lot of questions, and the answers often happen to lead to new questions.

I think starting... Full Bio

Newtonian mechanics has marked the beginning of a new era for physics. Indeed the newtonian formulation of the gravitational force has allowed to prove the heliocentric theory developped by Copernicus and defended by Galileo. It is a very interesting story that deserve a full post (maybe one day, if I have enough time...).

I'm writing this post because I had to teach to freshmen the foundations of newtonian mechanics. The point is I never liked how formulas were dropped from nowhere when I was a freshman myself. First there was a speach about inertia principle (or newtonian first law of motion), then the teacher would introduce the famous vectorial relation (second law of motion). But the second one was not derived directly from the first one. And yet it is an immediate work.

What is inertia :  "The vis insita, or innate force of matter is a power of resisting, by which every body, as much as in it lies, endeavors to preserve in its present state, whether it be of
rest, or of moving uniformly forward in a straight line."

That's how Newton defined it in his Principia. It simply states that an object doesn't change his current motion until it has a good reason, or otherwise,if there's no cause, there is no consequences... Written formally  for an isolated object ( being the
velocity of the object considered).

Once Newton introduced infinitesimal calculus, it was easy to formally link the velocity to the acceleration , particularly interesting for non-constant .

Now, we can notice that any object that is dropped with no speed (), will start moving under the action of gravity. Before it touches the ground, we have a non-null . Something acts on it and accelerates it.

For the proportionnality coefficient, one can simply notice that pushing a mass  demands twice the force needed to push a mass , thus introducing an extensive quantity called inertial mass. Why inertial? simply because it quantifies how much a body resists to a change in its current state. It is easy to illustrate that with a spring and two bodies with the same mass, and a non-frictionnal support. Try to pull one of the bodies with the spring, and then both at the same time, and you'll simply notice that the spring extension will double (the extension of the spring is proportionnal to the force applied).

Finally we end with: .

Comments

rholley's picture
The point is I never liked how formulas were dropped from nowhere when I was a freshman myself.

Two years ago, David Kaiser of MIT wrote an article Turning Physicists into Quantum Mechanics.  The article summary is misleading: what he was relating is how increased demand for their skills caused a massive increase in class size, so that the earlier generation of students who could discuss QM in depth with the "Great Ones" was followed by a generation who were taught how to turn the handles and produce results.

The process you describe I would call "Turning Budding Physicists into Formula Monkeys".  Alas, even though class sizes are shrinking, the formula habit is now as difficult to remove from the system as treating dry rot.

I think you would enjoy A History of Mechanics (Dover Classics of Science and Mathematics) by Rene Dugas, ISBN 0486656322.  The Amazon synopsis does it justice.

Sweeping, monumental study traces the history of mechanical principles chronologically from their earliest roots in antiquity through the Middle Ages to the revolutions in relativistic mechanics and wave and quantum mechanics of the early 20th century. Contributions of ancient Greeks, Leonardo, Galileo, Kepler, Lagrange, many other important figures. 

  And it's a reasonable price!



Hi Robert, thanks for the link, I think I'm going to have a look on that book.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.