Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Neuroscience

By Travis Bradley | November 6th 2009 07:41 PM | Print | E-mail | Track Comments

Pain is important. The experience of pain can engage protective behavioral responses to harmful stimuli, and the effective communication of pain can warn others of potentially hazardous situations (and perhaps even the nature of that hazard). To be effectively communicated, however, observers must recognize the pain occurring in others, experience some proximal version of the pain themselves or at least understand its significance (sometimes sympathizing), and respond accordingly.

By Dave Deamer | November 5th 2009 09:27 PM | 9 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments

    In a column posted a few days ago (November 1) I mentioned that my friend John Evans, a Cambridge (England) mathematician, has developed a general formula for estimating biocomplexity. It is quite simple, using only two variables: the number of units in a system, and the number of connections (interactions) each unit has with other units in the system. Today, in fact, biologists publish ‘interactomes” with furry ball figures that illustrate the number of proteins in a given cell and the number of interactions each protein has with other proteins.

By Dave Deamer | November 1st 2009 10:04 PM | 19 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments

John Evans, a mathematician friend of mine in Cambridge England, came up with a formula that specifically allows one to estimate the relative complexity of nervous systems in the animal kingdom, from C. elegans to the human brain. It takes into account not just the number of neurons in the brain, but also the number of synaptic connections that link neurons to one another, and in a second version, the encephalization quotient.


By News Staff | October 23rd 2009 12:00 AM | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
Prenatal sex-based biological differences extend to genetic expression in cerebral cortices and the differences in question are probably associated with later divergences in how our brains develop, according to a new study by Uppsala University researchers Elena Jazin and Björn Reinius in Molecular Psychiatry.

Professor Elena Jazin and doctoral student Björn Reinius at the Department of Physiology and Developmental Biology previously say they have demonstrated that genetic expression in the cerebral cortices of human beings and other primates exhibits certain sex-based differences. It is presumed that these differences are very old and have survived the evolutionary process.


By Travis Bradley | October 19th 2009 12:43 PM | Print | E-mail | Track Comments

Anyone interested in the topic of emotion has no doubt encountered the work of neurologist Antonio Damasio. Here’s a good introductory FORA.tv interview with Dr. Damasio. Event Date: 07/04/09



By News Staff | October 19th 2009 01:00 AM | 2 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
Infants can correctly identify humans as the source of speech and monkeys as the source of monkey calls even when they are as young as five months old, says a new Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) study.  

While young children know that humans speak, monkeys grunt and ducks quack, it's not clear when we come to know which vocalizations each of these animals produce.  Much is known about infants' abilities to match properties of human voices to faces, such as emotion, but it is unknown whether infants are able to match vocalizations to the specific species that produces them.


By News Staff | October 19th 2009 12:00 AM | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
Brain activity considered to be  spontaneous 'white noise' changes after a person learns a new task, according to researchers, and the degree of change reflects how well subjects have learned to perform the task.

The suggestion is that this learning-induced change in the brain's spontaneous activity may reflect  a 'memory trace' for the new skill, which makes it easier to use those parts of the brain together again when the same challenge is presented. 

In addition to helping anatomical connections between different brain regions, the changes in spontaneous brain activity may maintain a record of prior experience that constrains the way the same circuitries are recruited at the time of a task. 


By Travis Bradley | October 16th 2009 07:58 PM | 2 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments

By Lisa Fleece | October 16th 2009 01:02 PM | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
While inflammation often causes damage to the nerves of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, a group of HBI researchers has been studying how neuroinflammation can instead be harnessed to repair the damage caused by this disease.

Dr. V.W. Yong’s laboratory set out to test whether a drug that is used to treat MS symptoms, Copaxone or glatiramer acetate (GA), could also play a role in repairing the covering of nerves that have been damaged by MS.  


By Jigyasa Jyotika | October 15th 2009 11:59 PM | 2 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments

Sculpture by Auguste Rodine/ Baltimore Museum of Art (Courtesy of www.theboldsoul.com)


No sooner met but they looked;
No sooner looked but they loved;
No sooner loved but they sighed;
No sooner sighed but they asked one another the reason;
No sooner knew the reason but they sought the remedy;
And in these degrees have they made a pair of stairs to marriage;
Which they will climb incontinent;
Or else be incontinent before marriage.


-Shakespeare, As You Like It

I was under the impression that the general subject of love, in all its oblique insanity, was the subject of study and much woeful writing by poets, mostly.