Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Evolution

By Michael White | November 2nd 2009 01:33 PM | 25 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
This is a little old, but Thomas Mailund, who writes on of my favorite blogs, has posted a video interview with Svante Pääbo, the scientist leading the neanderthal genome project. At one point Pääbo addresses the question everyone's asking: did humans and neanderthals have sex? Pääbo says of course they did (why wouldn't they during the 10,000+ years they lived together), but the question is whether they produced hybrid offspring. He hopes to answer the latter question with the neanderthal genome sequence.

Read the feed:


By Michael White | November 1st 2009 10:04 AM | 3 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
Welcome to the 17th edition of the Carnival of Evolution. This month, we celebrate not only great evolution blogging around the web, but also some of the best evolution writing of all time. 150 years ago, in November of 1859, The Origin of Species was published. For our sesquicentennial celebration of this major turning point in the history of biology, I've taken a virtual voyage on the Beagle through the vast expanse of the blogosphere. And like Darwin on that first trip in the Beagle, I've kept a journal of my observations, with a little posthumous help from Charles.

By Gerhard Adam | October 31st 2009 05:03 PM | 3 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
In this article I am going to suggest that this arbitrary separation is meaningless.  Much like physics had to come to terms with wave-particle duality, biology must consider the same perspective where the answer depends very much on the question and how it is asked.


By Dave Deamer | October 31st 2009 09:24 AM | 2 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
A few days ago, I was working at home when the phone rang. I answered, and was surprised to hear a soft, accented voice asking for me. It was Lada Tsokolova, calling from Germany, with the sad news that her husband Sergey had just died of cancer.  I was stunned. Sergey was young! He had spent nearly a year in my lab in 2005-06, on a Fulbright Fellowship, and I had seen him recently at scientific meetings in Kyoto and Heidelberg, but he never mentioned that he was ill.

By Emmanuelle Savigny | October 30th 2009 04:31 AM | 1 comment | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
 Has evolution selected the best possible features for the species existing nowadays, or has it  done a second-hand job with whatever was available?

By Hatice Cullingford | October 29th 2009 09:59 PM | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
Two letters to Nature today burst into data about a gamma-ray burst, GRB 090423. The first is A big gamma-ray burst at a redshift of z approximately 8.2 by N. R. Tanvir et al.

By Michael White | October 29th 2009 10:59 AM | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
Get your submissions in for a special, 150th Origin of Species anniversary edition of the Carnival of Evolution, going online November first. I've already received a whole slew of outstanding contributions; submit your writing and it will be in good company.

You can submit via the online submission form. If you have any problems with submission, email me via my contact form.

Read the feed:


By Gerhard Adam | October 28th 2009 03:01 PM | 1 comment | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
A LiveScience article entitled "Top 10 Mysteries of the First Humans" raises several questions of which many are simply the quest for details regarding origins and migrations.  However, there were a couple of questions that focused on other elements and warrant some consideration.
 
Question #5: Is Human Evolution Accelerating

"...saying that it remains difficult to ascertain whether or not certain genes really have recently grown in prominence because they offer some adaptive benefit."

By News Staff | October 27th 2009 12:00 AM | 1 comment | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
When Charles Darwin published On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life 150 years ago next month, he avoided conjecture about the origin of life and "To my mind it accords better with what we know of the laws impressed on matter by the Creator" shows that he had limits on the cultural firestorm he wanted to create in the name of science.


By News Staff | October 25th 2009 12:00 AM | 1 comment | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
The great diversity of male sexual traits, ranging from peacock's elaborate train to formidable genitalia of male seed beetles, is the result of female choice, say researchers from Uppsala University, but why do females choose among males? In a new Current Biology study they found no support for the theory that the female choice is connected to "good genes".

There is no consensus among biologists over the key question why females choose among males but the heart of this debate has two preferred possibilities - that female choosiness is beneficial to the females themselves or that female choice traits are favored because of 'good genes' that males contribute to female's offspring.