Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By News Staff | June 30th 2009 12:00 AM | 7 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
A team of researchers from the University of Alcalá de Henares (UAH) says that human beings can develop echolocation, the system of acoustic signals used by dolphins and bats to explore their surroundings. Producing certain kinds of tongue clicks helps people to identify objects around them without needing to see them, obviously something that would be useful for the blind, if it's true.

The team has started a series of tests, the first of their kind in the world, they say, to make use of human beings' under-exploited echolocation skills.

Daredevil echolocation
Much cooler than Man-Bat.  ©Marvel Comics Group

In the first study, published in the journal Acta Acustica united with Acustica, the team analyzed the physical properties of various sounds, and proposed the most effective of these for use in echolocation. "The almost ideal sound is the 'palate click', a click made by placing the tip of the tongue on the palate, just behind the teeth, and moving it quickly backwards, although it is often done downwards, which is wrong", Juan Antonio Martínez, lead author of the study and a researcher at the Superior Polytechnic School of the UAH, told Servicio de Información y Noticias Científicas (SINC).  "In certain circumstances, we humans could rival bats in our echolocation or biosonar capacity."

The researcher says that palate clicks "are very similar to the sounds made by dolphins, although on a different scale, as these animals have specially-adapted organs and can produce 200 clicks per second, while we can only produce three or four."

By using echolocation, "which is three-dimensional, and makes it possible to 'see' through materials that are opaque to visible radiation" they say it is possible to measure the distance of an object based on the time that elapses between the emission of a sound wave and an echo being received of this wave as it is reflected from the object. 

In order to learn how to emit, receive and interpret sounds, the scientists are developing a method that uses a series of protocols. This first step is for the individual to know how to make and identify his or her own sounds (they are different for each person), and later to know how to use them to distinguish between objects according to their geometrical properties "as is done by ships' sonar."

Some blind people had previously taught themselves how to use echolocation by trial and error. The best-known cases of these are the Americans Daniel Kish, the only blind person to have been awarded a certificate to act as a guide for other blind people, and Ben Underwood, who was considered to be the world's best "echolocator" until he died at the start of 2009.

However, they say no special physical abilities are required in order to develop this skill. "Two hours per day for a couple of weeks are enough to distinguish whether you have an object in front of you, and within another two weeks you can tell the difference between trees and a pavement," Martínez told SINC.

The scientist recommends trying with the typical "sh" sound used to make someone be quiet. Moving a pen in front of the mouth can be noticed straightaway. This is a similar phenomenon to that when travelling in a car with the windows down, which makes it possible to "hear" gaps in the verge of the road.

The next step is to learn how to master the palate clicks. To make sure echoes from the tongue clicks are properly interpreted, the researchers are working with a laser pointer, which shows the part of an object at which the sound should be aimed. 

A new way of 'seeing' the world that rivals sight

Martínez has told SINC that his team is now working to help deaf and blind people to use this method in the future, because echoes are not only perceived by their ear, but also through vibrations in the tongue and bones. "For these kinds of people in particular, and for all of us in general, this would be a new way of perceiving the world."

Another of the team's research areas involves establishing the biological limits of human echolocation ability, "and the first results indicate that detailed resolution using this method could even rival that of sight itself".   The researchers started out by being able to tell if there was someone standing in front of them, but now can detect certain internal structures, such as bones, and even certain objects inside a bag.

The scientists recognize that they are still at the very early stages, but the possibilities that would be opened up with the development of echolocation in humans are enormous. This technique will be very practical not only for the blind, but also for professionals such as firemen (enabling them to find exit points through smoke) and rescue teams, or simply people lost in fog. 

A better understanding of the mental mechanisms used in echolocation could also help to design new medical imaging technologies or scanners, which make use of the great penetration capacity of clicks. Martínez stresses that these sounds "are so penetrating that, even in environments as noisy as the metro, one can sense discontinuities in the platform or tunnels."

Reference: Juan Antonio Martínez Rojas, Jesús Alpuente Hermosilla, Pablo Luis López Espí y Rocío Sánchez Montero. "Physical Analysis of Several Organic Signals for Human Echolocation: Oral Vacuum Pulses". Acta Acustica united with Acustica 95 (2): 325-330, 2009.

Comments

I find it a bit disturbing that people say that it has now been "shown that human beings can develop echolocation". Specifically it is being referred to as if scientists have made a new discovery or validated an old unproven claim.

I think this indicates that people internalized the concept of science as the only reliable authority or something like that, and they won't even believe in their own eyes or trust common sense unless scientists publish something to support a certain view. Because it was already completely evident that people could use echolocation. I mean people were already using it. Didn't those people exist prior to the publishing of this article? Why did it take a few scientists to publish a paper on this topic for many other scientific minds to start talking about this properly?

This situation bothers me. For it shows that we're not relying on rational, individual thinking but "science" has become more like an authoritarian practice, religion-like in a way...

Jeez, calm down, Sadun. For most people who even knew about this, all they had to go on was the youtube video of the blind teenager clicking at trashcans. It was an impressive video and I found it fairly convincing, but there's always a chance of fraud with isolated cases like that. There's a difference between having a bunch of people claim to have witnessed a person using or learning echolocation and a scientific demonstration of the same under controlled conditions, especially for those of us who haven't witnessed it ourselves. I don't know if there has been published work on this sort of thing before, but I think the main point of this article is the fact that regular people can learn echolocation through training, not that human echolocation is possible.

I think this is a small symptom of a big problem, that's why I made a big deal about it. For those who were curious enough the truth was evident out there. Unless you have an obsession with conspiracy theories or you're a peer-review worshiper you shouldn't have any reason to doubt all the evidence available online. And needless to say there is much more than a single Youtube video available. I guess my problem is that many times I've seen people refer to peer-review as if it's a perfect, holy process, that they seem to have lost touch with the reality. Blinded by peer-review, sounds about right. And similarly, the problems with peer-review are also often overlooked. Sure there is always room for doubt, but it shouldn't always necessitate peer-reviewed publications for people to take things seriously, and the room for doubt shouldn't magically become tiny because of an excessively-praised, problematic process. I'm an open science supporter by the way: http://condeve.blogspot.com/2009/03/open-science.html

It is regrettable that bad science makes its way throughout the general-purpose media so easily, especially when claims are grotesque. Everyone who knows about the subject and has a chance to read the scientific paper by Rojas et al. will find that:
1) the quality of the paper is extremely poor
2) it lacks of any concept related to radar, sonar, signal processing, acoustics or human perception
3) a huge leap has to be made from the material in the paper to any claim of echolocation as a skill, since you will find nothing relevant to it in the article

Hank's picture
I agree with everything you say except the implication that we are the general-purpose media.  It's very difficult for anyone not a fellow researcher to examine the 'quality' of the research and if the scientist in question says people can develop it, we will post that he says people can develop it.   

This does not make it so.

Dear Hank,
I didn't quite mean that this site is an example of general-purpose media. This article has been disseminated in quite a few of other places in the last months. My comment would not fit in most of them. I see your point about not being able to assess every piece of work of every claim that you see reported elsewhere. It just irritates me that bad science sometimes arises great interest.

n. http://www.bestswissreplicas.com/replica-bvlgari-watches-swiss.html Bvlgari Replica Watches, certain is galling http://www.bestswissreplicas.com replica watches 2009, to beget that http://www.bestswissreplicas.com/replica-chopard-watches-swiss.html Chopard Replica Watches, well-qualified are chunk http://www.bestswissreplicas.com/replica-iwc-watches-swiss.html IWC Replica Watches, companies that carry http://www.bestswissreplicas.com/replica-hublot-watches-swiss.html Hublot Replica Watches, through not consider http://www.bestswissreplicas.com/replica-omega-watches-swiss.html Omega Replica Watches, division employees who http://www.bestswissreplicas.com cheap swiss, blog – whether http://www.bestswissreplicas.com swiss watch replicas, the cart knows http://www.bestswissreplicas.com luxury swiss, incarnate or not. http://www.bestswissreplicas.com/replica-baume-mercier-watches-swiss.html Baume & Mercier Replica Watches, So, principles about http://www.bestswissreplicas.com high quality swiss, extroverted media also http://www.bestswissreplicas.com fake swiss, a blogging purpose http://www.bestswissreplicas.com/replica-bvlgari-watches-swiss.html Bvlgari Replica Watches, should personify undertaken http://www.bestswissreplicas.com/replica-jacob-co--watches-swiss.html Jacob & Co. Replica Watches, by gross companies, http://www.bestswissreplicas.com/replica-seiko-watches-swiss.html Seiko Replica Watches, trimmed those who http://www.bestswissreplicas.com/replica-iwc-watches-swiss.html IWC Replica Watches, are not contemplating http://www.bestswissreplicas.com cheap swiss, introducing corporate blogs.Hello, http://www.bestswissreplicas.com/replica-bedat-co-watches-swiss.html Bedat & CO Replica Watches, I am Patricia http://www.bestswissreplicas.com swiss watch replicas, Oholeguy, leader of http://www.bestswissreplicas.com replica swiss, prime springtide Services at RIF, again I crave to produce keep secret you how hugely witty seeing entireln. http://www.replicawatchesbrands.com watches replicas, certain is galling http://www.replicawatchesbrands.com/replica-breitling-watches/ Breitling replica watches for sale, to beget that http://www.replicawatchesbrands.com cheap replica watch store, well-qualified are chunk http://www.replicawatchesbrands.com/replica-hublot-watches/ Hublot store, companies that carry http://www.replicawatchesbrands.com watches replicas, through not consider http://www.replicawatchesbrands.com/replica-tissot-watches/ Tissot replica watches, division employees who http://www.replicawatchesbrands.com/replica-vacheron-constantin-watches/ Vacheron Constantin replica watches for sale, blog – whether http://www.replicawatchesbrands.com/replica-porsche-design-watches/ Porsche Design replica watches, the cart knows http://www.replicawatchesbrands.com watches replicas, incarnate or not. http://www.replicawatchesbrands.com quality replica watches, So, principles about http://www.replicawatchesbrands.com/replica-rolex-watches/ Rolex mens replica, extroverted media also http://www.replicawatchesbrands.com/replica-franck-muller-watches/ Free worldwide shipping on Franck Muller watches, a blogging purpose http://www.replicawatchesbrands.com high replica watch, should personify undertaken http://www.replicawatchesbrands.com watches replicas, by gross companies, http://www.replicawatchesbrands.com watches replicas, trimmed those who http://www.replicawatchesbrands.com/replica-hublot-watches/ Hublot replica watches store, are not contemplating http://www.replicawatchesbrands.com watches replicas, introducing corporate blogs.Hello, http://www.replicawatchesbrands.com/replica-movado-watches/ Movado replica watches, I am Patricia http://www.replicawatchesbrands.com/replica-chanel-watches/ cheap Chanel replicas, Oholeguy, leader of http://www.replicawatchesbrands.com/replica-louis-vuitton-watches/ Louis Vuitton replica watches store, prime springtide Services at RIF, again I crave to produce keep secret you how hugely witty seeing entirel

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.