Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By News Staff | December 30th 2008 01:00 AM | 11 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
Researchers in Great Britain and the United States have imaged the first high definition imprints that dolphin sounds make in water.   They consider it a real breakthrough in deciphering dolphin language.

Certain sounds made by dolphins have long been suspected to represent language but the complexity of the sounds has made their analysis difficult. Previous techniques, using the spectrograph, display cetacean (dolphins, whales and porpoises) sounds only as graphs of frequency and amplitude.

Using high definition audio recordings of dolphins, the research team, headed by English acoustics engineer, John Stuart Reid, and Florida-based dolphin researcher, Jack Kassewitz, has been able to image, for the first time, the imprint that a dolphin sound makes in water.   They call it CymaScope and say it reveals detailed structures within sounds, allowing their architecture to be studied pictorially.The resulting "CymaGlyphs," as they have been named, are reproducible patterns that are expected to form the basis of a lexicon of dolphin language, each pattern representing a dolphin 'picture word.'



Dolphin Cymascope  Sound Beam Principles

Within the field of cetacean research, theory states that dolphins have evolved the ability to translate dimensional information from their echolocation sonic beam. The CymaScope has the ability to visualize dimensional structure within sound. CymaGlyph patterns may resemble what the creatures perceive from their own returning sound beams and from the sound beams of other dolphins.

Reid said that the technique has similarities to deciphering Egyptian hieroglyphs. "Jean-Francois Champollion and Thomas Young used the Rosetta Stone to discover key elements of the primer that allowed the Egyptian language to be deciphered. The CymaGlyphs produced on the CymaScope can be likened to the hieroglyphs of the Rosetta Stone. Now that dolphin chirps, click-trains and whistles can be converted into CymaGlyphs, we have an important tool for deciphering their meaning."

Kassewitz, of the Florida-based dolphin communication research project SpeakDolphin.com said, "There is strong evidence that dolphins are able to 'see' with sound, much like humans use ultrasound to see an unborn child in the mother's womb. The CymaScope provides our first glimpse into what the dolphins might be 'seeing' with their sounds."

The team has recognized that sound does not travel in waves, as is popularly believed, but in expanding holographic bubbles and beams. The holographic aspect stems from the physics theory that even a single molecule of air or water carries all the information that describes the qualities and intensity of a given sound. At frequencies audible to humans (20 Hertz to 20,000 Hertz) the sound-bubble form dominates; above 20,000 Hertz the shape of sound becomes increasingly beam shaped, similar to a lighthouse beam in appearance.

Reid explained their novel sound imaging technique: "Whenever sound bubbles or beams interact with a membrane, the sound vibrations imprint onto its surface and form a CymaGlyph, a repeatable pattern of energy. The CymaScope employs the surface tension of water as a membrane because water reacts quickly and is able to reveal intricate architectures within the sound form. These fine details can be captured on camera."


Baby dolphin's call made visible as a CymaGlyph

Kassewitz has planned a series of experiments to record the sounds of dolphins targeting a range of objects. Speaking from Key Largo, Florida, he said, "Dolphins are able to emit complex sounds far above the human range of hearing. Recent advances in high frequency recording techniques have made it possible for us to capture more detail in dolphin sounds than ever before. By recording dolphins as they echolocate on various objects, and also as they communicate with other dolphins about those objects, we will build a library of dolphin sounds, verifying that the same sound is always repeated for the same object. The CymaScope will be used to image the sounds so that each CymaGlyph will represent a dolphin 'picture word'. Our ultimate aim is to speak to dolphins with a basic vocabulary of dolphin sounds and to understand their responses. This is uncharted territory but it looks very promising."

Dr. Horace Dobbs, a leading authority on dolphin-assisted therapy, has joined the team as consultant. "I have long held the belief that the dolphin brain, comparable in size with our own, has specialized in processing auditory data in much the same way that the human brain has specialized in processing visual data. Nature tends not to evolve brain mass without a need, so we must ask ourselves what dolphins do with all that brain capacity. The answer appears to lie in the development of brain systems that require huge auditory processing power. There is growing evidence that dolphins can take a sonic 'snap shot' of an object and send it to other dolphins, using sound as the transmission medium. We an therefore hypothesize that the dolphin's primary method of communication is picture based. Thus, the picture-based imaging method, employed by Reid and Kassewitz, seems entirely plausible."


Do we necessarily want to know what dolphins think of us?

The CymaGlyphs of dolphin sounds fall into three broad categories, signature whistles, chirps and click trains. There is general agreement among cetacean biologists that signature whistles represent the means by which individual dolphins identify themselves while click trains are involved in echolocation. Chirps are thought to represent components of language. Reid explained the visual form of the various dolphin sounds, "The CymaGlyphs of signature whistles comprise regular concentric bands of energy that resemble aircraft radar screens while chirps are often flower-like in structure, resembling the CymaGlyphs of human vocalizations. Click trains have the most complex structures of all, featuring a combination of tightly packed concentric bands on the periphery with unique central features."

Regarding the possibility of speaking dolphin, Kassewitz said, "I believe that people around the world would love the opportunity to speak with a dolphin. And I feel certain that dolphins would love the chance to speak with us - if for no other reason than self-preservation. During my times in the water with dolphins, there have been several occasions when they seemed to be very determined to communicate with me. We are getting closer to making that possible."


Comments

Fascinating stuff and quite encouraging. Although among humans, we don't discuss speaking "human" but speaking English or French or Chinese... and it's even questionable how easily understood humans are given regional accents and dialects within the same language. I assume someone is watching for these variations as well. It probably means that, at least initially, it's more important to learn to talk to some particular dolphin rather than all dolphins. And even then, that particular dolphin might not be capable of speaking for his whole population. It might depend on how, uh, well-schooled he is. None of this is a reason not to do it or not to be excited. Just trying to put the difficulty ahead into perspective.

Hank's picture
I agree that given the geographical dispersion of dolphins it's unlikely they'll be any more organized than we are about language.  So first we learn how they talk, then we learn how to make Pidgin Dolphin.

saddlechariot's picture
Then we try to sell them something.
Simon

Ahem. Sell them something?

It could be the dolphins view human language as just sounds.

What matters most is the dimension of feeling that the sounds attempt to articulate. For anecdotal material on how dolphins communicate with humans, for example, through the medium of feeling, one might refer to the new book, TOUCH THE OCEAN: THE POWER OF OUR COLLECTIVE EMOTIONS, and the chapters, "Another Pretty Dolphin Story?" as well as, "Trinidad and Tobago." These observations recorded while performing craniosacral therapy (unpronounceable, I know) with human clients in a sheltered area in the Bahamas from 2000, under the auspices of the Upledger Institute, with very specific health benefits. When the dolphins are engaged in these healing situations with craniosacral therapists, even the Navy cannot recognize the new sounds displayed by the dolphins.

Back to the drawing board boys? (Maybe your approach is a bit off because of, well, your approach?)

Respectfully, a researcher might re-evaluate his or hers basic point of view.

:)

Thank you.

Gerhard Adam's picture
A question that needs to be asked is; why do we want to talk to dolphins?   Is it because its a puzzle, or a challenge?  It certainly isn't that we're interested in anything they might have to say.  After all we have millions of intelligent human beings that we can speak with that we don't listen to what they have to say, so why the dolphins?

To be honest, I don't see how any results from such an effort could be anything but detrimental to the dolphins.


Turn your bs detectors on, people. The article obfuscates, and an inspection of the website of the company making these devices reveals that it's a bunch of pseudo-scientific jargon being used to hype their product. There's no scientific breakthrough here.

Don't you think that, after this overall globalization, it's very interesting and important to know a culture who is almost beyond all our expectatives?
Read the questions suggested in speakdophin.com

Gerhard Adam's picture
I reviewed the questions and concluded that it was rubbish.  All of the questions were human-self-serving and displayed a total lack of interest in an "alien culture" except as as "pets".  Without going through all the questions let me make a few comments.

1.  Why would we care what dolphins call themselves?  We had that experience with Native Americans and promptly ignored what they told us and called them Indians anyway.

2.  Why do we care if they believe in a supreme being?  This would simply be another vehicle to declare them barbarians or "animals" if they disagreed with whatever group was asking the question.  We certainly wouldn't take their answer as indicative of some "truth".

3.  Questions like "how can we help?" are simply stupid.  If humans wanted to help, then they would leave other species alone.  They neither need our help nor our assistance except insofar as it constrains human behavior and activity.

4.  Some are so goofy as to defy explanation.  "Are cetaceans in communication with lifeforms beyond this planet?"  PLEASE!  "So Long and Thanks For All the Fish" is a work of fiction and shouldn't be taken seriously.

5.  Questions like "is there important information about the oceans that humans are unaware of?"  once again display human arrogance and ignorance.  We already know that we aren't very good about keeping our trash out of the oceans.  We can't truly be that ignorant as to believe that having a dolphin tell us will make any difference when millions of humans are already saying it.

In general, too many humans fail to grasp the concept that the way one shows respect is not to insert themselves into another culture.  Quite frankly, the best way to treat all living things is to leave them alone and stop interfering in their lives.  However, humans can't even do that for themselves, so it isn't really that surprising.

Let's be honest.  Communicating with any other species is simply a product of human curiosity (or being nosy if I'm going to be cynical about it).  We certainly would never consider them as equals, and once the novelty wore off, they would simply be another tedious voice that we would ignore for our own objectives anyway.

When Dionysos noticed their plot, he called on the divine power. Terrified pirates dove into the sea, then changed into dolphins. ...

to be continued...

logicman's picture
Turn your bs detectors on, people. The article obfuscates, and an inspection of the website of the company making these devices reveals that it's a bunch of pseudo-scientific jargon being used to hype their product. There's no scientific breakthrough here.

I agree with the anonymous comment.  When I was a kid in the 1950s this technique was demonstrated on a science tv show called 'Tomorrow's World'.  You can do an experiment at home.  Take a stretched membrane, sprinkle flour or sugar on it and make a loud enough sound - that's the sort of pattern you get.  You can also use a flat metal plate and a violin bow - same sort of pattern.

The 'CymaGlyph' is just a circular spectrogram, but with coarser detail and slower response time, hence it is absolutely useless for fast-tracking ultrasonic waves.
Dr. Horace Dobbs, a leading authority on dolphin-assisted therapy ...

Dolphins cure ailments?  Heck, I'll just cure what ails me by getting a duck to quack.

The surprising paucity of scientific evidence for the long-term effects of DAT raises profoundly
troubling ethical questions regarding its widespread use and promotion. There is abundant evi-
dence for injuries sustained by participants in DAT programs ((Frohoff and Packard 1995; Samuels and Spradlin 1995; Webster, Neil and Madden 1998). Moreover, interactions between dolphins and humans carry a significant risk of infections and parasitism for both humans and dolphins (Geraci  and Ridgway1991). Therefore, DAT poses important ethical questions from the standpoint of human and captive dolphin welfare. At the very least, we believe that DAT practitioners should be required to inform parents and, when relevant, participants, of the absence of evidence for DAT’s enduring effects on psychological symptoms. Only then can consumers of DAT make adequately informed decisions regarding the costs and benefits of this unsubstantiated intervention.


Lori Marino and Scott O. Lilienfeld


The CymaScope employs the surface tension of water as a membrane because water reacts quickly and is able to reveal intricate architectures within the sound form. These fine details can be captured on camera.

What is it that is actually shown on the camera? A black and white photo can only show different light intensities on the water surface. Are these supposed to be caused by the displacement of the water surface or is something added on the water?

The 'CymaGlyph' is just a circular spectrogram, but with coarser detail and slower response time, hence it is absolutely useless for fast-tracking ultrasonic waves.

There is no transformation to the frequency domain. If i understand correctly, only the resulting vibration of the water surface is shown.

On another website i found that the source for the cymascope is only a sound recording.
If this is true, then there is only a time signal and no spatial information (not multiple microphones).
In this case the pictures can be generated much easier with a numerical simulation of an excited membrane, but I dont see how the method can help to give any additional information of the sound distribution.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.