Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By David Houle | August 24th 2008 08:03 PM | 5 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More A Future Look at Today articles

All

About David Houle

David Houle is a future thinker, speaker and strategist who advises organizations about dynamic trends. He is the author of The Shift Age.

 


It was two years ago that I first wrote about ocean dead zones. These are areas of the ocean that, due to a lack of oxygen, no longer sustain any life. While dead zones can happen naturally, they usually are caused by the results of human activity. A primary cause is nitrogen-rich nutrients from agricultural fertilizers that flow into coastal waters from rivers and streams.


 


Last week there was a report published in the Journal of Science that stated that the number of these ocean dead zones around the world has doubled every decade since the 1960s. There are now some 400 coastal areas that periodically or perpetually become dead due to oxygen starved bottom waters.


 


While the size of these dead zones is small relative to the total surface of the oceans, they account for a significant percentage of ocean waters that support commercial shellfish and fish species. This is due to the fact that these zones occur in areas that have historically been prime fishing grounds since these grounds are close to dense human populations.


 


In recent years there have been consistent dead zones in the Gulf of Mexico, Chesapeake Bay, the Baltic Sea, the coastal areas of China and even the Kattegat Sea where the Norwegian lobster industry has been decimated.. There is now a regular dead zone off the coast of the Pacific Northwest that was mentioned in the column two years ago.


 


The developing problem with these dead zones is that over time entire species are killed off. Additionally, they are preventing the rebound of many species that are under protection due to over fishing. We have over fished the oceans and are now creating dead zones on the coasts of all continents.


 


We humans know that all life comes from the ocean. That was where life first began on this glorious planet. We have often referred to ourselves as the highest form of life on this planet. How can we think of ourselves in such a manner if we are allowing our behavior and sloppy use of fertilizer to start to kill the cradle of life?


 


We have often referred to our planet as Planet Earth. That is because we are land animals. Actually, with oceans covering close to 70% of the surface of the planet, a better name would be Planet Ocean. We know how we have polluted and damaged the land on which we live. We are now doing the same to the 70% of the planet where we don’t live.


 


We need to immediately start to do whatever is necessary to stop damaging the oceans and the life forms that live there. We need to treat the oceans as our connection to survival. I have only half jokingly suggested that humanity should declare a year moratorium on eating seafood. Would you stop eating sushi and seafood for a year and refuse to eat food grown with nitrate fertilizers if the survival of your children and grandchildren depended upon it?


 


 


Comments

Kimberly Crandell's picture
Very interesting article, thank you. Are there things that can be done to reduce the amount of fertilizer making its way into the ocean? Is this something that is regulated in any way?

I'm already more conscious of how much beef my family consumes because of the methane issue from cattle and other farm animals. Now it appears we should be aware of how much seafood and fish we eat. That leaves… vegetables? Oh wait, now we’re back to the fertilizer issue. *sigh* What’s left to eat… nuts and berries?

Welcome to the 8th Extinction. It's not a question of if but when, and when it occurs, we can only hope that the best of human activity survives. It's going to be an interesting ride no matter what.

rholley's picture
I was thinking of all that weed that sprung up and threatened to scupper the sailing Olympics at Qingdao recently. Couldn't that be harnessed to mop up some of the nitrate?

And now my eye has just lighted on Cyanobacteria - The 'Big Bang' Of Evolution Could Save Our Energy Future.

Robert H. Olley
Physics Department
University of Reading
England

Interesting article; it simply reinforces the need to deal with these issues in a timely and responsible manner!

Gerhard Adam's picture

"How can we think of ourselves in such a manner if we are allowing our behavior and sloppy use of fertilizer to start to kill the cradle of life?"

While I can appreciate the sentiment, statements like the one above drive me crazy.  The problem is what it has always been .... humans thinking that somehow they live outside the environment and it's through their concern of insight that they deign to acknowledge it and try and "save" it.

The problem is that we will NOT kill the "cradle of life", but rather we will kill ourselves.  Humans will go extinct long before we can destroy the oceans.  Jupiter doesn't suffer from the lack of humans, it simply exists as it is.  Similarly if the Earth becomes non-viable biologically then it will go on as it is.  Even if a significant number of species went extinct (including humans), it wouldn't do anything except change the look of the biosphere.  This has happened numerous times in the past and will certainly happen again.  Once again, the planet certainly won't "suffer" as a result of these changes.   

Can you imagine having this kind of discussion when an eminent disaster is about to occur?  Driving in your car at 100 mph at a concrete wall, we calmly discuss how sad it will be for the car to get all banged up?  How unfortuanate that those nice colors may be scratched and chipped?  We may get side-tracked with a discussion about how good the engines sounds and to remind ourselves that we need to get the oil changed.  Thinking that maybe if we applied the brakes then we could avoid these things, but jeeze, we haven't had to exert ourselves that much before so we'll think about it and gather evidence to see if it will really help.


We need to stop acting as if the environment or nature is "out there" somewhere and start realizing that Planet Earth doesn't need our assigned name, nor does it need us.  It will go on as it has cosmically for billions of years.  It is up to us to determine whether we participate in that future. 



Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.