Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By Michael White | May 28th 2009 03:47 PM | 15 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More Adaptive Complexity articles

All

About Michael White

Welcome to Adaptive Complexity, where I write about genomics, systems biology, evolution, and the connection between science and literature, government, and society.

I'm a biochemist


... Full Bio

FOXP2 may be the gene that makes us human - or so the hype goes. Hyped or not, FOXP2 is rightly a focus of intense research, since it is a gene that clearly has a major effect on human speech. Mutations in FOXP2 are responsible for some rare but strange language disorders, such as the inability to learn grammatical skills or make the proper mouth/facial movements to properly articulate words. 


Chimps and mice have FOXP2, but they obviously can't talk (although, amazingly, FOXP2 mutations in song birds diminish the birds' ability to learn songs). Scientists have been suggesting for some time that changes in the FOXP2 gene may have played a key role in the development of language in recent human evolution, and maybe (indulging in wild speculation here), changes in FOXP2 were in part responsible for the Great Leap Forward in human cultural evolution that occurred about 50,000 years ago.

So if FOXP2 is somehow responsible for the recent evolution of human language skills, there is only one obvious experiment to do: put the human version of the FOXP2 gene in a chimp and see if it talks. The problem there is that making transgenic chimps is generally considered unethical, not to mention technically difficult.

A group of scientists did the next best thing - they put human FOXP2 into a mouse, and the results are reported in the latest issue of Cell.

Disappointingly, mice with human FOXP2 don't talk, but they do have some interesting brain features: "medium spiny neurons have increased dendrite lengths and increased synaptic plasticity," which is almost as amazing as the ability to talk.

This amazing, because what the researchers found is that human FOXP2 placed into a mouse causes changes in a region of the brain called the basal ganglia. In humans, the basal ganglia region is important for, among other things, speech, word recognition, and language comprehension. FOXP2 mutations in human patients have an impact on the performance of the basal ganglia.

One of the key findings in this study is that human FOXp2 increases synaptic plasticity in the mouse basal ganglia neural circuits. As the term suggests, synaptic plasticity is the ability of neurons to change the strength of the connections they make with each other. This ability is important for forming efficient, information processing circuits in the brain. It is possible that changes in FOXP2 produced changes in the basal ganglia circuits that improved our "capacity to learn and coordinate the muscle movements in lungs, larynx, tongue and lips that are necessary for speech," in the words of the study authors. How that might have worked in detail still has to be worked out.

If this story holds up, it will be a fascinating example of how very small, simple changes in genes can produce major effects. There are only two differences in the amino acid sequences of the human and chimp versions of the Foxp2 protein, and these two amino acid changes were enough to cause significant changes in the brain circuitry in the humanized mice - not quite enough to make a talking transgenic pet, impressive nonetheless.




Comments

logicman's picture
This is an interesting research finding.  The plasticity aspect is of interest in the study of child acquisition of language.  A related link, i.e. concerning the speech area generally rather than the FOXp2 gene specifically, is to hyperkinesias, motor area overaction defects.  Some motor areas of the brain, when defective, affect speech by over-applying the production methods of speech - usually referred to in this context as grammars - producing forms such as 'scoopded'.

The relevance of muscular coordination is doubly relevant to speech: coordination is essential to speech production, but, I suggest,  records of that coordination as speech production may be essential to speech recognition via a  'mirror neuron' method.

Hank's picture
Proof of our age difference; I would have thought someone would use Fievel from "American Tail" ... you went with Stuart Little.

adaptivecomplexity's picture
Well, Stuart Little has a stronger Google image search presence - I couldn't help it. I remember watching American Tail in the theater. I couldn't get that 'Somewhere Out There' song out of my head for weeks, unfortunately.

logicman's picture
Stuart Little has a stronger Google image search presence

Not quite, as shown by these recent figures from the Google Institute of Statistical Studies:

Number of search results - estimated by application of the W.A.G.1 search results filter.

Mus calcularis 92,300,000
Stuart Little    11,700,000
Mickey Mouse   11,600,000
Mus musculus    3,340,000
Jerry Mouse     1,240,000
Fievel            252,000

[1]  Wild Ass Guess.

adaptivecomplexity's picture
See, Stuart's got Fievel beat by an order of magnitude!

Hank's picture
I was stunned by that mus calcularis result (and, frankly, heartened) so I actually put into Google and it said: 65 results. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=opera&rls=en&hs=tyX&q...

W.A.G. indeed!

logicman's picture
I forgot that Latin is only for a geekisimo  elite.  Try "computer mouse."  ;)

jtwitten's picture
Somewhere, out there, beneath the pale moonlight, someone is thinking of you, and missing you tonight. . .

adaptivecomplexity's picture
Seeing how you sit behind me during the day, that's kind of creepy.

I love this piece. Keep writing about mice--our major proxy in the realm of modern experimental science.

Of interest to you may be a series of pieces done not long ago about sub-aural murine "chirping" and whispering akin to that of birds. See Citation: (2005) Music to Her Ears? Male Mice Sing an Ultrasonic Tune. PLoS Biol 3(12): e420.

When I spent time at Jackson Labs a few years ago, I was told of a legendary "mouse whisperer" there but was never able to meet her.

Also, regarding Stuart Little: The lab is emphatic that the character was ot named after Clarence Little, the founder of the Lab. (Trivia that is of no use to anyone!)

Keep writing!

adaptivecomplexity's picture
I didn't emphasize this in the article, but, interestingly, the ultrasonic chirping was different in the mice with human version of FOXP2. Maybe they'd be more responsive to the mouse whisperer.

what happen to the mouse with the human ear?



logicman's picture
what happen to the mouse with the human ear?

'Ere we go,  mate >> The mouse with a human ear on its back.

i heard

Is it true that stem cell research will one day lead to make a injection to make your penis longer or say if you cut it off you can grow a new one, what really makes your penis grow?

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.