Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By Michael White | July 3rd 2009 11:59 AM | 2 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More Adaptive Complexity articles

All

About Michael White

Welcome to Adaptive Complexity, where I write about genomics, systems biology, evolution, and the connection between science and literature, government, and society.

I'm a biochemist


... Full Bio

This is not much of a surprise:

In six out of ten countries including Argentina (57%), China (72%), Great Britain (62%), India (77%), Mexico (65%) and Spain (61%), the majority of people who had heard of Charles Darwin and know something about his theory of evolution agreed with the opinion that ‘enough scientific evidence exists to support Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution’, compared to an overall average across all the countries surveyed of 56 percent.

Less than half of those surveyed in Russia (48%), South Africa (42%), USA (41%), and Egypt (25%), who know something about Charles Darwin and his theory of evolution, agreed with the opinion that enough scientific evidence exists to support this theory.

The US is, as always, near the bottom of the pile when to comes to scientific literacy about evolution.


This next result, however, is puzzling:

In all countries surveyed more people showed some agreement than disagreement that ‘it is possible to believe in a God and still hold the view that life on Earth, including human life, evolved over time as a result of natural selection’. Adults in India showed the highest level of agreement (85%) from all the countries, followed by Mexico (65%), Argentina (62%), South Africa (54%), Great Britain (54%), Russia (54%), USA (53%), Spain (46%), Egypt (45%), and China (39%)...

The results also show that people polled in the USA, South Africa and India are the most likely to believe that life on Earth, including human life, was created by a God and has always existed in its current form (all at 43%).

So in India, 85% of the people believe that God and evolution are compatible, yet 43% of them thnk life has always existed in its current form?

It would be interesting to see a breakdown of these last numbers: how many people who reject evolution think God and evolution are incompatible? How many people who reject God think God and evolution are incompatible?


h/t National Center for Science Education.



Comments

Gerhard Adam's picture
It's important to remember that many religious people have accepted the concept that they term "microevolution" with respect to natural selection.  The argument has shifted to speciation events.

So it seems that the question is rather vague when it comes to assessing what is meant by evolution and how compatible it is with people's religious beliefs.  I suspect that many of those that accept compatibility between the two are not informed enough to actually have a valid perspective.  After all ... what does it mean to say "know something about his theory of evolution"?

Hank's picture
In America, it's only intellectually fashionable to be skeptical about religion.  And Bigfoot.  Maybe ghosts.   Americans culturally have had 200+ years of distrust of appeals to authority and it won't change any time soon and evolution and physics and psychology and medicine will not be exempt.   
I think the efforts behind these surverys are more agenda-based than the responses.  It gives Brits a way to feel smarter than Americans.   Evolution is complex and we teach just enough to give people ways to make mistakes so skepticism is actually a sign of understanding the issue, as frustrating as it can be to biologists.

The Indian response shows the weakness of appealling to authority cultures.   They simultaneously believe in evolution because they know they're supposed to yet see no issue with young earth creationism.   So at least Americans know what they disbelieve in.  :)

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.