Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Fake Banner
By Warren Davies | August 29th 2009 10:28 AM | 3 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More Useful Psychology articles

All

About Warren Davies

I am Warren Davies, a 28 year old student of psychology. I am male, and have been my whole life. I became interested in psychology many years ago, because I thought if I could understand the human... Full Bio

Put your hand up if you think you have poor social skills?  If you just raised your hand, I've got some good news and some bad news for you.  The bad news is, maybe you do.  The good news is, you shouldn't rely on your own appraisal of your social skills to determine this; in other words, your social skills are probably better than you think they are.  If you were feeling dramatic (which I am) you might call this the social skills delusion.

In the past, people with social anxiety were thought to be suffering from weak social skills.  This makes intuitive sense: if you have poor social skills, interactions don't go well, you don't create the impression you want to create, so you become anxious about future interactions.  But cognitive models have challenged this idea, suggesting that socially anxious people are suffering from a cognitive illusion, rather than a social skills deficit.


Some Research

In one study, researchers took two groups of 33 individuals; one socially phobic, one nonclinical control group.  They subjected these unfortunate individuals to one of the scariest situations the human race has come up with - public speaking.  A 3 minute speech had to be given, with only 2 minutes to prepare.  After all was said and done, the researchers compared self-ratings with observer ratings of the speeches.  The result?  Both groups rated their own performance worse than the observers did - but the social phobics, as you might expect, were a little harder on themselves. (1)

In another study, Strahan and Conger used an almost equally nerve-wracking scenario - the job interview.  Public speaking, job interviews... I hear in the next study they are having participants recount the third act of Hamlet while bungee-jumping off a bridge.  I'm joking of course; presumably they're using stressful situations to make the results more measurable.  They compared two groups again - both nonclinical this time, but with low and high social anxiety, and found that high levels of social anxiety had no negative effect on interview performance. (2)

Children aren't exempt from the illusion, either.  After a conversation with an unfamiliar adult, high and low social anxiety children rated their performance in different areas related to the conversation.  The adult then rated the children on the same areas.  As it turned out, the adults were unable to tell which were the high and which were the low anxiety children - but the anxious kids thought they appeared more nervous than they actually did. (3)



Good News!

This is all pretty good news for me: maybe my Arnold Schwarzenegger impressions are going down better than I thought!  The bottom line seems to be that, before socially anxious people start taking social skills courses and picking up a copies of How to Make Friends and Influence People, they should try fixing these maladaptive beliefs about their own social performance.  

This has implications for the treatment of social anxiety, which in the past had been focused on social skills training.  One paper recommended CBT as a technique to address social anxiety based on the cognitive model - when the belief is fixed, the anxiety may reduce.

So if you're worried about the impression you make on other people, relax; you might be making a better impression than you think.  

References:

(1) Rapee, R. M.&Lim, L. (1992). Discrepancy Between Self and Observer Ratings of Performance in Social Phobics. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 101(4), 728-731.

(2) Strahan, E.,&Conger, A. J. (1998). Social anxiety and its effects on performance and perception. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 12(4), 293–305. 

(3) Cartwright-Hatton, S., Tschernitz, N., Gomersallc, S. (2005) Social anxiety in children: social skills deficit, or cognitive distortion? Behaviour Research and Therapy 43, 131–141


Comments

Gerhard Adam's picture
This is all pretty good news for me: maybe my Arnold Schwarzenegger impressions are going down better than I thought!

Mmmmm .... probably not :)

Warren Davies's picture
Don't knock it 'till you heard it! :)

Hello,
Interesting paper, typical of what social sciences are or may be : a knowledge base that tend to influence ones own behaviour and understanding of the environment. Indeed, true or false, these informations can be taken back into the loop that makes one see the world this or that way. Can be. Because where I live for instance, in the high democrat middle class of a middle town of a perfectly developed country of the old Europe (not UK obviously, sorry about that), there is no chance people could really understand the use that they could make of such news (or beliefs, depending on the importance and the reliability one recognises to the source where they come from, which is not at all in debate in this comment don't worry). And it gets even worse if I try to insist and tell the point about the retro-activity of the "cognitive loop" : no one would listen, everybody would think it's pure nonsense, useless abstraction, intellectual misery, clear sign of social inability. And that's quite very sad, as otherwise the common moral discussions are boring, don't deny it.

Where I'd like to moderate the idea : one's social skills are not that bad that one may think they are, except when it comes to social relations where is discussed the way social skills are acquired, used and evaluated : in that case, they are perceived as worse than they are. Probably because one generally can't stand the situations where the social frame of the reality is evoked, manipulated and minimised.

Not certain I expressed well enough my intuition, but I can resume it this way : don't expect to make friends by explaining complex interactive notions about making friends, at least with ordinary people.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.