Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By Becky Jungbauer | May 20th 2009 05:24 PM | 10 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More A Truth Universally Acknowledged articles

All

About Becky Jungbauer

A scientist and journalist by training, I enjoy all things science, especially science-related humor. My column title is a throwback to Jane Austen's famous first line in Pride and Prejudice


... Full Bio

Is there an advantage to being short? I think so, but I'm biased, being what the French call quite "petite." Good things come in small packages, I say.

But now at least one person with a presumably solid foundation in science backs me up. So when I hear yet another short joke (and I think I've heard 'em all), I can smile smugly to myself and know that all you leviathan, Brobdingnagian skyscrapers over 5' (or for the non-abnormal-American-measurementally inclined, 1.5 m) are actually at a disadvantage.

Later In Life

David Eagleman is a neuroscientist at Baylor, director of the Laboratory for Perception and Action, and director of the Initiative on Neuroscience and Law. And a fiction writer. In other words, a guy with a lot of free time. (According to Wiki, an early experience of falling from a roof raised his interest in understanding the neural basis of time perception. I also had a fall from a roof in college, but all I got was a pair of crutches.)

The long range goal of his lab, according to his Web site, "is to understand how the brain constructs perception, how different brains do so differently, and how this matters for society. Our three main prongs involve time perception, synesthesia, and neurolaw."

So when he talks about these subjects, I think it's safe to assume he knows what he's talking about.

Recently on NPR, Eagleman said there is one possible, ever-so-slight drawback to being tall:   

Eagleman can imagine situations where tall people experience the world a little later than short people.

If 6-foot-4-inch Abraham Lincoln and a 5-foot-2-inch person were standing side by side, Eagleman thinks he could demonstrate that "now" might come a teensy bit later for Abe than for the shorter person.

Since the 5'2" person is taller than me, I'd experience "now" faster than both of them! Take that, Abe. But how is this possible?

A Short Story

"The brain manages to synchronize what's happening even though sensory data comes through your eyes, ears, tongue and skin at slightly different times and speeds," the  NPR article says. So, the brain puts the signals on a time delay until the last one comes in and then shoots 'em all off at once, creating a simultaneous experience. (TV takes advantage of this for editing purposes, but sometimes even they are bested.)

"This brief waiting period allows the visual system to discount the various delays imposed by the early stages; however, it has the disadvantage of pushing perception into the past. There is a distinct survival advantage to operating as close to the present as possible; an animal does not want to live too far in the past. Therefore, the tenth of a second window may be the smallest delay that allows higher areas of the brain to account for the delays created in the first stages of the system while still operating near the borders of the present."  

Eagleman gives the example of a person touching his nose and toe at the same time. (Try it and play along.) Did you feel the touch at the same time? I did. But if you think about it, shouldn't the signal from the toe that says, "hey, something is touching me" take a miniscule amount of time longer to get to your brain? After all, your nose is on your face, which is next to your brain. So you should have felt the touch on your nose first.

It may be that our sensory perception of the world has to wait for the slowest piece of information to arrive, Eagleman says.

"Given conduction times along limbs, this leads to the bizarre but testable suggestion that tall people may live further in the past than short people."

Apparently Napoleon, a short dead dude, didn't read any of Eagleman's work, or the Battle of Waterloo may have ended differently.

I'm in good company, though - there are a lot of short people out there doing great things. Short films, short stories, bermuda shorts, Get Shorty - all thanks to short people. (Ok, maybe I made that up.)

Some big little people (all 5'4" and under)
Beethoven
Mel Brooks
Michael J. Fox
Danny DeVito
Buckminster Fuller (inventor of the geodesic dome)
Truman Capote
Ghandi
Nikita Khrushchev
Keats
Picasso
Prince
Paul Simon
Princess Leia
Dolly Parton
Joan of Arc (who is not Noah's wife)

So instead of resting your arm on the head of your shorter brethren, lean down and experience life in the fast lane.

Comments

Stephanie Pulford's picture
Becky, I'm pretty sure I will enjoy this article immensely as soon as the experience of seeing it reaches my brain.  ^__^

In other news, at 5'3" I've rarely been accused of being a giant.  I'm liking this.  Time to grind some bones to make my bread. 

Becky Jungbauer's picture
Time to grind some bones to make my bread.

Now THAT is a fun saying!

Gerhard Adam's picture
Doesn't that also mean that tall(er) people live longer?  :)

Becky Jungbauer's picture
Perhaps a tiny bit longer. But really, why would you want to if all of us wonderful people are gone?

Napoleon wasn't short - that's simply legacy propaganda, still persisting today.

Becky Jungbauer's picture
Hi Ian - you are correct, he was relatively normal height for his era - about 5'6" (the French inch was longer than the British inch, so he was recorded as 5'2", hence everyone thinking he was really short). Also, his fellow soldiers were a bit taller than he was, so in comparison he looked short. But I use Napoleon in this article because (a) heuristics and (b) the psychological inferiority complex associated with his name.

Heuristics, eh? Well, can't argue with that.

logicman's picture
Maitre d'Academe Militaire,
Brienne-le-Château
M'sieu

My petite Naploeon is unable to come to l'ecole today
as he is in bed suffering from a bad case of l'heuristique.

Regarde
Maria Letizia Ramolino


logicman's picture
I am 6ft. 2in.   This gives me the perfect excuse for walking around all day with my head in the clouds.


antunes's picture
I wanted to have the first post here, but being 6', this was the best I could do.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.