Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By Becky Jungbauer | November 24th 2009 06:44 PM | 10 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
About Becky

A scientist and journalist by training, I enjoy all things science, especially science-related humor. My column title is a throwback to Jane

...

View Becky's Profile
Missouri can proudly claim it is first in the nation - first to test a new "diverging diamond" interchange that improves traffic flow by eliminating problematic left turns. Sound boring? I admit, the story didn't jump out at me at first. But the myriad diagrams with tiny cars moving across the screen got me hooked, and now I hope that the experiment, if successful, spreads across the country. Even Popular Science reported on the action.

The new interchange is located at busy northwest gateway in Springfield, Mo., according to MoDOT. Let's pretend you're in a car on MO-13, traveling north (so, from the bottom left on the light orange road to the bottom right of the image). You arrive at the stoplight, where your lane intersects the southbound traffic; you'll see oncoming traffic at a 25 degree angle, according to the animation (click on the "how to drive this interchange" section here). As you cross and drive across the bridge, you're now in the "left" lanes. The turquoise center is where pedestrians can safely walk. You reach the other side of the bridge and the other stoplight, and continue on back to the "right" side of the road, per usual.



A key feature of this design improves traffic flow and safety. Can you spot it?

Look at the upper right portion of the bridge. Put yourself on the bridge on the light orange road, driving north (so, to the right). You can either (a) go straight and stay on MO-13, or (b) merge onto I-44. See it yet? The answer: a free left turn. There are several advantages to this left turn. As you can see above, drivers who want to turn left and merge onto I-44 do so before the stoplight. This key feature allows drivers:
  • to avoid waiting for left turn signals
  • to avoid crossing oncoming traffic, eliminating (in theory) right-angle crashes.
  • to flow freely across the bridge in two lanes of traffic, as there is no left turn lane to block traffic - reducing delays and rear-end accidents


As a sufferer for many years of the "old" version - two lanes of traffic across a bridge merge into one going straight, while the second lane is now used for left-turn only - I think it's a great idea. In the old way traffic slows interminably; you get the inevitable douchebags who cut in line at the last second, thus avoiding the 30 minute wait the rest of us had to suffer; and life generally blows. The diverging diamond configuration enables 600 left turns onto the freeway per hour per lane - double that of an ordinary interchange where drivers cross oncoming traffic.

Another bonus is cost, both time and money. The change doesn't require much new construction, according to MoDOT project manager Don Saiko.
"We're using the existing bridge, didn't have to replace the bridge, so that's a huge
savings," Saiko said. "If we would've had to replace the bridge, it would have been around $10 million — and this project was just around $3 [million]."

If time is money, consider that it took less than half a year to build the new interchange in Missouri. With traditional designs, construction can drag on for two years.

Apparently the inspiration came from Versailles (yes, France), where this kind of interchange has been in use for 20 years and has been quite effective. (And you thought only treaties and revolutions came out of Versailles.)

Here's a nice overhead shot of the exchange, courtesy of MoDOT. You can see the pedestrian walkway in the center of the bridge as a dark gray stripe.



MoDOT also put out a brochure that tells you how to drive through the intersection (check out page 2 here). And if you want to watch a video, try here. The intersection has worked so well that MoDOT is planning to construct these in Kansas City and St. Louis. Check out a video of the proposed I-435/Front St interchange here, or a YouTube with some rocking background below:





Comments

You mention "the nation", and "the country". The only nation or country you actually specify is France, in which you state that it has been in use for 20 years already, so you're probably thinking of one of the 190 or so other nations in the world.

Becky Jungbauer's picture
In addition to naming cities and states that are located in the U.S., next time I'll also include the country, zip code, geographic coordinates and nearest Starbucks.

rholley's picture
And planet, star system, galaxy, galactic cluster too, please.

But anyway, this is brilliant!  Definitely not that Springfield ....

This is cool, it takes up much less real estate than a full cloverleaf, sacreficing the addition of two traffic lights on the lesser road (MO13). This traffic light issue makes the intersection less than ideal in many cases, so it seems to be a tool for the road designer's toolbelt, but hardly a universal solution. I am rather partial to traffic circles for non-freeway intersections. I kinda fell in love with them when I spent time in England (E.U., Planet earth, star system of Sol, Milky Way galaxy, one known universe.)

Becky Jungbauer's picture
I hadn't had much experience with traffic circles until I lived in D.C., and I have to admit that I loved them. They made a lot of sense there. I think you make a key point - it isn't universal. The diamond may not work in all cases, nor would a traffic circle make sense in others. But it's nice to have more efficient options.

Becky Jungbauer's picture
Oh, sorry - U.S.A., approximately 40 degrees, 10 min N; 75 degrees, 9 min W.

rholley's picture
Careful, Becky,

Joshua (nicer than orange squash you are, as the song goes) might object to your use of degrees and minutes, and insist on your using radians.

rholley's picture
One more thought.  Could you please supply a link to a larger picture of the intersection?  I want to see if the North-going Zax and his South-going counterpart are still in there somewhere.

Becky Jungbauer's picture
Ha! If you click on the picture you'll get the link.

rholley's picture
Doh!

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.