It is really a hopeless situation to talk to somebody in a sensible way who is in the habit of unleashing all sorts of insults on suspicion without a shred of a proof. It is mean to call somebody mean only because someone else has said something mean about him. You have no idea who is El Naschie nor what he has done. You are taking the word of people who are acting in bad faith. The whole campaing against him was materminded by a german lady who is now working in Holland. The reason is money, a great deal of money. There is also an element of vendetta and malignant jealousy. If you check your facts you will find that Nature has removed the defamatory article against El Naschie. If you research your subject you will find that John Baez has withdrawn his allegations, closed his blog and went into hiding. If you check in the court in Hamburg, you will find a court case. You will also find a big scandal. Someone has pulled the leg of Nature and several other publications and journals owned by the same company namely Macmillan. El Naschie is totally innocent. He is a victim of unscrupulous people who have no fear whatsoever from slandering, defamaing and even threatening innocent people to achieve their despicable aims. When you check with the Old Bailey in London, you will find even more perturbing news about the standard of the internet today. You can practically destroy the life of anyone if you are mean enough. If you are not, you should take off this despicable heading of your article.

Jean Pierre

Jean Pierre said "insults on suspicion without a shred of a proof". LOL

It is almost certain "Jean Pierre" is an Egyptian. The Naschienal Socialists are famous for their extensive but inept use of sock puppetry.

Best regards,

Jason

Hi Becky,

Jean Pierre and G. Wyte are Naschie Party sockpuppets. I have extensive experience identifying them. I am sorry if these creeps are bothering you; some bloggers kick them off. But if you have the stomach to put up with them, more power to you.

El Naschie denounced my El Naschie Watch blog by name recently in an Arabic language media interview. They post here because they're afraid to enter the lion's den by posting on my blog.

Jason

Hehe
Thanks Hank!

That is what you are good at you guys. If the webmaster or Mr. Hank find the stuff of Jason and those characters fun and fine then that speaks only for their character, education and the milieu in which they grew up.

Mohamed El Naschies name is featuring in a brand new Royal Society Article just published. The paper is titled The Invariant Set Postulate a new geometric framework for the foundations of quantum theory and the role played by gravity. Proc. R. Soc. A published online 19 July 2009. Prof. Palmer is a theoretical physicist who participates in a sort of technology transfer bringing the mathematical methods of high energy physics and quantum mechanics to bear on weather forecast. Inspired by the work of Mohamed El Naschie he seems to have seen the light. He put his case succinctly using the following apt description. He said quantum mechanics is blind to fractals and this is the source of all paradoxes and contra intuitive interpretations of quantum mechanics. Many leading scientists regard Palmers paper as a milestone and blatant admission of the mainstream that they have been missing the point for decades. If this is the only good thing which came out of the work of Mohamed El Naschie then he was more than justified in publishing all his work in his own journal which is incidentally untrue. He has published in many other journals than Chaos, Solitons and Fractals. I was pleased to see that Palmer as befitting an Englishman and scientist acknowledged his indebtedness to the work of Ord Nottale and Mohamed El Naschie. He clearly is scornful of the cheap propaganda which has been conducted now for far too long against Mohamed El Naschie and his associates. I think it is time for the proprietor of this blog to change the titled of his article and acknowledge the bitter truth that the campaign against El Naschie was malicious deceptive and intended to serve the purpose and hidden agendas of certain quarters.

It is a matter of public document that Mohamed El Naschie alias M Saladin Al Nashai as the correct Arabic spelling is, has taken Nature to the High Court. The writ against Nature is a public document which anyone can inspect by visiting the webpage of the High Court of London. The writ must have taken Nature by surprise and they have not been able to file a defence until this point of time. M S El Naschies lawyers are a big name in the UK and internationally. They are asking in private negotiations for a settlement in the order of 10 million pounds sterling. In news which have leaked through the lawyers offices of Nature. The only conclusion is that John Baez has misled Nature and he himself is in a trap of his own doing. I sincerely hope El Naschie wins his case so that this internet disgrace and anarchy could be tempered in the future for the benefit of all of us. We have seen the big scandal of banking in the US and elsewhare. I hope the media moguls like McMillan and Elsevier should be the next in line.

Sarah Limbrick would surely be interested to know what the leading libel expert in England had to say about the Nature article complained of. He said he is in a state of disbelief that the worlds most respectable scientific journal Nature should publish an article which bears all the hallmarks of the tabloid press. Another interesting point is the conspiracy theory linking the plagiarism of El Naschies work published in Scientific American with the Nature article as well as a far worse article published in Die Zeit. Interestingly all of these three publications are owned by Macmillan. I understand from confidential sources that a mega surprise will be released at the trial engulfing highly reputed names some of whom are Nobel laureates. The site is http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=1&storycode=44545&c=1.

Sehr geehrter Herr Blog-Intendant,
anscheinend machen Sie sich ernsthafte Gedanken über Islam und Wissenschaft. Ich nehme an, dass Sie nicht an einer Verleumdungskampagne teilnehmen wollen, denn dafür gibt es im Internet genügend Personen die ihr Leben damit vertrudeln andere Menschen aus Frust zu beschimpfen und ihnen alles Mögliche in die Schuhe schieben. Wenn ich in dieser Annahme richtig bin, dann möchten Sie sicherlich folgendes wissen.
1. John Baez ist kein ernsthafter Mathematiker und noch weniger Physiker. Er hat sich lediglich durch seine große Klappe einen Namen gemacht.
2. Renate Loll hat viele Arbeiten veröffentlicht, die letzte in Scientific American, die nichts anderes sind als eine Reformulierung der Theorie von Mohamed El Naschie, Laurent Nottale und Garnet Ord. Dies ist eine wissenschaftliche Unehrlichkeit in größtem Maße.

3. Als Rache an EL Naschie hat Loll die mit Baez sehr befreundet ist ihn beauftragt die Verleumdungskampagne zu inszenieren. Nature, Quirin Schiermeier und Christoph Drösser waren nur Werkzeuge von John Baez.
4. Rückenstärkung bekommt Professor Renate Loll von ihrem Chef dem Nobellaureat Geradus `t Hooft. Schließlich wird das Preisegeld zusammen geteilt.
5. Geradus `t Hooft ist ein enger Freund und Kollege von El Naschie. Was für eine Freundschaft. Der Rest ist Schweigen.
6. Wenn Sie im Obergericht in London nachfragen, werden Sie wissen, dass El Naschie Nature, Quirin Schiermeier, DIE ZEIT und Scientific American vor den Kadi genommen hat. Das ist das erste Mal in der Geschichte der renommierten Zeitschrift Nature, dass sie vor Gericht stehen. Glauben Sie im Ernst, irgendein Professor wird diesen Schritt wagen wenn er im Unrecht wäre. Sie müssen auch wissen, das die größte Anwaltskanzlei Londons Professor Mohamed El Naschie repräsentiert. Diese Kanzlei würde niemals jemanden gegen Nature repräsentieren wenn er im Unrecht wäre. Die haben einen Namen zu bewahren.
Das sind die Tatsachen und wenn Sie es unverändert in Ihrem Blog veröffentlichen dann helfen Sie dabei die Wahrheit ans Tageslicht zu bringen.

Here is what a great Swedish scientist Tonu Puu said about Mohamed El Naschie or M.S. El Naschie in his beautiful book Art, Science and Economics published by Springer in 2006. The last paragraph of the preface says I was most honoured when some time ago Professor Mohammad El Naschie, Editor-in-Chief of one of the most exciting and successful journal publishing ventures (Elsevier) I have ever been involved in, suggested to publish this essay in parts in the shape of articles, though I naturally prefer the present connected publication form. This does not sound like a mean man and common decency requires that the blog master of this site should change the appalling title.

Mr A. Hammad: Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.