Scientific Blogging can help your career! Well, indirectly.
A study out of Melbourne University in Australia found that workers who surf the internet for fun at work, within a reasonable limit of less than 20 percent of total office time, are about nine percent more productive than non-surfers.
The study of 300 office workers found that 70 percent of people who use the internet at work engage in Workplace Internet Leisure Browsing. "Firms spend millions on software to block their employees from watching videos on YouTube, using social networking sites like Facebook or shopping online under the pretence that it costs millions in lost productivity. However, that's not always the case," says Dr. Brent Coker in the Brisbane Times.
"Short and unobtrusive breaks, such as a quick surf of the internet, enables the mind to rest itself, leading to a higher total net concentration for a day's work, and as a result, increased productivity," Coker says.
I think what Coker is trying to say is that you should sign on to Scientific Blogging every day at work and write a blog or column. It's a win-win - you're more productive, and we get to read more scientific content!
N.B. For those that see the Brisbane Times headline, it does not say "Workplace web bludgeoning..." as I initially thought. "Bludging" is equivalent to surfing, in the context of lounging about surfing on the web. Or so says Google.
Comments
Becky Jungbauer | 04/03/09 | 15:16 PM
Gerhard Adam | 04/03/09 | 15:39 PM
Gerhard, that's way too much logic for big companies to grasp - and sadly, my experience shows me that they are usually pretty lacking in that area. I've worked for two big companies, both that sang the praises of productivity - and then promptly fired the most productive and experienced people when a lay-off came around simply because of the size of their salary.
Somehow productivity measurements go out the window when it comes time to "meet the numbers" by the end of the quarter. Somehow, keeping a less experienced, less productive, lower paid employee seems to win out every time - for the sake of saving a few dollars an hour.
Somehow productivity measurements go out the window when it comes time to "meet the numbers" by the end of the quarter. Somehow, keeping a less experienced, less productive, lower paid employee seems to win out every time - for the sake of saving a few dollars an hour.
Kimberly Crandell | 04/03/09 | 15:59 PM
Patrick Lockerby | 04/03/09 | 16:23 PM
Gerhard Adam | 04/03/09 | 16:03 PM
Thanks for catching the double post
No problemo, Becky!
Gerhard: when economic productivity is measured only by inputs and outputs, then as a grammar school educated programmer would say:
quisquiliarum init, exit quisquiliarum.
Atque memento, nulli adsunt Romanorum qui locutionem tuam corrigant. :)
I am confident that soemone else will post the translations, so I'll skip that part and
duck and run. :)
Patrick Lockerby | 04/03/09 | 16:16 PM
Gerhard Adam | 04/03/09 | 16:30 PM
Gerhard Adam | 04/03/09 | 16:31 PM
Patrick Lockerby | 04/03/09 | 16:35 PM
Patrick Lockerby | 04/03/09 | 16:49 PM
Becky Jungbauer | 04/03/09 | 18:06 PM
Illiud Latine dici non potest.
Atque memento, nulli adsunt Romanorum qui locutionem tuam corrigant
But remember, there are no Romans here to correct your pronunciation.
Huc accedit Zambonis!
Here come the Zambonis!
Atque memento, nulli adsunt Romanorum qui locutionem tuam corrigant
But remember, there are no Romans here to correct your pronunciation.
Huc accedit Zambonis!
Here come the Zambonis!
Patrick Lockerby | 04/03/09 | 18:32 PM
Gerhard Adam | 04/03/09 | 17:18 PM
Hank Campbell | 04/03/09 | 17:37 PM
... came across this quote which struck me as quite appropriate
On two occasions I have been asked,—"Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?" [...] I am not able rightly to comprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question
Charles Babbage
On two occasions I have been asked,—"Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?" [...] I am not able rightly to comprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question
Charles Babbage
Gerhard Adam | 04/03/09 | 17:38 PM
That a country, eminently distinguished for its mechanical and manufacturing ingenuity, should be indifferent to the progress of inquiries which form the highest departments of that knowledge on whose more elementary truths its wealth and rank depend, is a fact which is well deserving the attention of those who shall inquire into the causes that influence the progress of nations.
Charles Babbage - polymath.
Economist, mathematician, cryptologist and an early observer of noise pollution.
Economist
promoter of science education
cryptologist
early observer of noise pollution.
Patrick Lockerby | 04/03/09 | 17:53 PM
Patrick Lockerby | 04/04/09 | 10:00 AM













For me, being retired, it's the other way round:
A quick coffee break leads to higher total internet
concentration!
Becky: you have accidentally copied this blog. This is copy 1.