Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By Becky Jungbauer | July 15th 2009 01:43 PM | 6 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More A Truth Universally Acknowledged articles

All

About Becky Jungbauer

A scientist and journalist by training, I enjoy all things science, especially science-related humor. My column title is a throwback to Jane Austen's famous first line in Pride and Prejudice


... Full Bio

Is Big Box becoming Big Environment?

Wall Street Journal reported today that Wal-Mart "is requiring manufacturers to figure out the full environmental costs of making their products, and plans to distill the data into simple green ratings that shoppers will eventually see alongside prices for everything from T-shirts to televisions."

The global retail behemoth is "making the move as a way to get ahead of potential U.S. environmental labeling regulations — similar requirements are already popping up in Britain and Japan — and to set a standard on its own favorable terms that the retail industry can adopt to communicate the green hue of goods they sell, according to people familiar with the company's plans."

Wal-Mart will start Thursday, asking its suppliers to answer a set of 15 questions (to be answered by October) about consequences of manufacturing processes in areas such as water use and carbon dioxide emissions.

The broader goal is to build a comprehensive sustainability index, which will measure the full environmental footprint of each product Wal-Mart sells — for example, how much it contributes to global warming, whether it is made with toxic chemicals, if it contains wood harvested in ways that deplete natural stocks.

The index will judge products not just by the environmental costs of producing them, but by the impact over their entire life, and company buyers will be judged in part by whether they improve the numerical ratings of the products over time.

The result, according to scholars and environmental consultants advising the discount giant, is that Wal-Mart may carry different products in the future as it discovers the hidden costs of what it now sells.


But does green automatically mean sustainable? Not necessarily, says Jay Golden, a professor at Arizona State University. "You can design something that is carbon neutral, that does not contribute to climate change, and yet is still detrimental to human health in other ways," he said in the WSJ article. "So you have to look comprehensively at what sustainability really means, and that is what Wal-Mart is trying to do here in a very big way."

Comments

rholley's picture
Has anyone asked what  Apu Nahasapeemapetilon thinks about all this?

Becky Jungbauer's picture
Or Walley World, for that matter?

Gerhard Adam's picture
Well, this helps underscore my fears even more.

kerrjac's picture
On the subject of "something that does not contribute to climate change and yet is still detrimental to human health in other ways", you might consider carbon taxes or cap&trade systems. It's a bit  odd that this Jay Golden chose Wal Mart as an example to point this out, when this is the central issue of the entire debate.

Becky Jungbauer's picture
I know, right? I started off thinking he was anti-Wal-Mart and it turns out he's helping them.

Why create another standard that will only be used at one retailer. What about one with broad market appeal, such as JumpGauge Interactive Labeling (http://www.JumpGauge.com/)? Consumers could use it at all retailers, not just Walmart. Interactive labeling also offers greater transparency and knowledge transfer than a simple questionnaire

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.