Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By Becky Jungbauer | December 29th 2008 02:54 PM | 16 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More A Truth Universally Acknowledged articles

All

About Becky Jungbauer

A scientist and journalist by training, I enjoy all things science, especially science-related humor. My column title is a throwback to Jane Austen's famous first line in Pride and Prejudice


... Full Bio

What images do the words 'traumatic fertilization' conjur? If you are picturing deep-sea squid, you are either a fellow subscriber to Scientific American's daily digest or in dire need of pscyhological help.

This little nugget of 'size does matter' wisdom popped into my email inbox today, and I have to share.

Gary Stix (no discernable relation to the rock band Styx) started the story with this little gem: "What do you do to pass on your genes to the next generation if you are really hard up, it’s too dark to see clearly and you are literally under enormous pressure. The short answer: play rough and weird."

Deep-sea squidThe species of deep sea squid "that strut their stuff in the blackness that prevail thousands of feet beneath the ocean surface encounter few opportunities to  mate and so every tryst must count," Stix writes.

The squid are very aggressive - a trait noted when the giant creepy suckers were finally filmed live a few years ago.

The males are smaller than the females and "if they don’t play hard, fast, or clever they may get eaten by the Big Mamas. At these depths, size may matter a lot to make sure those little packets of love really stay put."

Stix goes on to write about the plight that, sadly, many females can identify with:




For female  squids, sex is truly a once-in-a-lifetime experience—and an apparently horrible one at that. The female releases millions of tiny eggs into the water along with the sperm contributed by the one male who got his hooks into her, and usually never goes back for seconds, the researchers found. Afterward, they never let a male get close—a behavior that even has led to the technical term "traumatic fertilization."

The posting includes a great tidbit about one squid literally shooting himself in the foot (tentacle?), and a particular group of male cross-dressers. Who knew squid were so perfect for a Vegas lounge show?

Also be sure to peruse the comments. My two favorites: "Sounds like squid pro quo to me!" and of course, "And this is different from human dating... how?"

Comments

Hank's picture
I guess I am not supposed to read this just because of the title but how could I help it?    We knew that lesbian necrophiliacs are why Discover is bigger than we are, and we have to assume Scientific American is bigger for similar reasons.    The best we could do was an article on female bugs with 'paragenitals' that guide the males to the right spot and impale them if they mess up - and that was in 2007.  

Clearly if we're going to get into the top spot in science we have to find people who write more deviant sex articles.


jtwitten's picture
Not to be pedantic, but where did they get the 40,000 leagues number?  Cause that is like 220,000km, and the radius of the Earth is only 6000-7000km. 

Hank, in this sentence
we have to find people who write more deviant sex articles.

is "more" modifying "deviant", "articles", or (fingers crossed) "sex"?


Becky Jungbauer's picture
I wavered on whether to use the SciAm headline, but it was just too good to pass up. And as you write in your lesbian article, Hank, the title definitely brings people in.

One of the commenters on the SciAm post noted the 40,000 leagues discrepancy as well - bonus points for you!, Josh! A league is about 5.6 kilometers. So, considering the giant squid is fairly well distributed across the world oceans, and  the average depth of the oceans is 3.79 km, that would be pretty darn impossible to find a giant squid even 4 leagues under the sea, much less 40,000. (Extra bonus points: the marine biologists that filmed the giant squid live used a bait line about 900 m long, or just under 1/5 of a league.)

jtwitten's picture
I think any sex at 91 atmospheres of pressure could be considered rough.
the marine biologists that filmed the giant squid live used a bait line about 900 m long

I'm not sure if I deserve bonus points for something that even a SciAm
reader noticed. :)  I did, however, do the math in my head.  If they
were going all literary, I don't understand why they didn't just use
Verne's "20,000."  They were only off by a factor of 200,000.  And, now, I cannot stop my brain from applying SciAmScale to everything.


Hank's picture
So that means we have something like 2x1011 readers per month.  (is that 200 billion?  No calculator nearby)

You all are sooooo going to get rich!

jtwitten's picture
You are correct, sir.

I'm somewhat surprised you chose to apply the SciAmScale to the readership instead of your own "bait line".

The 40,000 League title floored me too. Wikipedia defines a league as 'the distance a horse or a man can walk in 1-hour. Usually about 3.5 miles (5.5 Kilometers).' My siple caluclator tells me that 40K Leagues is 140,000 miles which is 5.6 times the diameter of the planet. Jules Verne's 'Nautilus' voyaged 20,000 leagues (almost three times around the planet) presumably without refueling or surfacing since it was "20,000 Leagues Under The Sea". Ya gotta just love SciAm. Never let fact stand in the way of a good story.

Hank's picture
When people ask me to describe our readership, I usually say "somewhere above Scientific American and below a peer-reviewed journal"  - it gets the point across without being too elitist.   We don't have the most readers, but for not all being PhDs in a narrow field like journals, we sure have the smartest.

dang Hank...why do you delete "my" junk but you keep "Josh's" junk...not fair, the distance discrepancy is funny and equal to more than half way to the moon, but even more disturbing is the traditional problem of the distance between the thumb and index finger as being "8" inches. Even if the writer intended things be measured in "fathoms" rather than "leagues" won't help much...

Hank's picture
I don't delete anything, unless it is someone who signs up and babbles about wormholes or alien energy sources controlling Nazis in Antarctica.

Authors can delete comments on their own articles, of course, and the moderators can delete, unpublish or promote blogs and articles.    If you posted a comment and it didn't show up, it may have just been a glitch.  We implemented an autosave feature for posts but it doesn't work for comments, since they are usually short.

jtwitten's picture
I object to the term "junk."  These comments are  high quality drivel.

Fossil Huntress's picture
I think any sex at 91 atmospheres of pressure could be considered rough.

Just saw the thread and couldn't type for laughing. Great title poaching awards to both Hank and Becky.... but best line from Josh!

Becky Jungbauer's picture
 I aim to please!

seeing how I made no mention of wormholes or Nazis in Antarctica maybe Becky is still mad at me for asking "does the Sun truly rise" some time ago. Come on Becky, I was only "funnin"...and no snorting at work. ;-)

Becky Jungbauer's picture
Nope, this is the first comment I saw from you on this posting! 'Fun' away - the more the merrier! And too late...work already thinks I'm weird. Snorting just adds to the mystique. :)

...I like you Josh, I stand corrected, one mans "junk" of course is another mans "treasure", I should have known better.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.