Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Fake Banner
By Dave Deamer | July 9th 2009 10:33 AM | 5 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
About Dave

My research focuses on a variety of topics related to membrane biophysics, including the origin of cell membranes and the use of transmembrane nanopores...

View Dave's Profile

Michael White recently blogged about Rock Stars of Science (July 8), which is an educational effort to attract kids to careers in science.  (Michael characterized this as “another hopeless attempt to make nerds look cool.”) 

My guess is that nerds are born, not made.  Many, perhaps most working scientists were not nerds. They drifted into their careers more or less by chance, taking a modest interest in science sometime in college, then choosing to do graduate work in a science program just because it seemed more interesting than a career in medicine, law or some other profession. 



But a few scientists are “to the manner born.” That is, at some point in their childhood they knew with certainty that this was the only thing they wanted to do. I would compare this to the rare musicians who were prodigies as children, attracted to music to the exclusion of all else.

For myself, I treasure a brilliantly clear memory of being five years old in Chicago, and watching an older neighbor kid pouring a concoction down a hole in the sidewalk. I asked what he was doing and he replied, “Made some ant poison with my chemistry set.” Wow! I wanted a chemistry set too! Which my parents wisely bought for a Christmas present later that year.

I can still remember the names of the chemicals, and the excitement of watching them react. This early epiphany affected the rest of my life. I endured nerdship in high school, then joined a few fellow nerds as a Chemistry major at Duke University, and now live in a happy community of nerds at UC Santa Cruz.


I wonder how many readers had a similar experience in their childhood? Is there a genetic predisposition that inevitably draws a rare few into science?



Comments

Gerhard Adam's picture
Whether it's completely good or not, I think the one thing that has elevated the status of nerds the most is CSI - Las Vegas and NUMB3RS (1).   Those two shows make it a point to not hide the science by ensuring their characters are scientists first instead of some super hero.

(1) For those of you that are fans of Bones, that show makes scientific people into a parody of nerds.

Gerhard Adam's picture
Is there a genetic predisposition that inevitably draws a rare few into science?

I always found that the most striking element of my childhood was parents that valued education.  This seems to parallel what many people see as the "competition" with other countries, in that a significant number of them value education as well.

Brains are not doled out equally. Some just get lucky.

Of course, curiosity, discipline and a willingness to get by on limited means are also qualities that serve scientists well.

adaptivecomplexity's picture
I wonder how many readers had a similar experience in their childhood? Is there a genetic predisposition that inevitably draws a rare few into science?

There at least has to be a predisposition to obsessiveness - which is what natural born scientists have in common with artists and musicians. When you combine obsession with talent, the result is usually impressive. The greatest scientists were/are pretty good at avoiding anything that would eat into their time and focus on science. Feyman, for example, was notoriously good at avoiding the administrative duties that plague most academic scientists.

Science is an invented method for explaining how the world works, who we are, and where we are going. Most people want that kind of address in the confusion of life and lifelessness. The distinguishing trait of scientists is that they are not content with established explanations and stories (stories, are also explanations)--religious, philosophical, historical, and even scientific.

Scientists, of course, generally accept the validity of the scientific method, and within the peer group of those who do, scientists are no less prone than other humans to jumping on band wagons and sharing the comfort of concurring minds. Within the science community, I suspect the individual willing and able and equipped to successfully challenge the norms and fashions and prevailing stories is no more common than the Stravinskies, the Martin Luthers, Picassos, or Joyces.

The human animal, like all animals, is very conservative about breaking fixed patterns, and in addition we are social animals who value our group ties. So the question would seem to be, what makes the aberrant personality for whom discovery has a much higher value than group acceptance?

Of course, "Fools rush in where angels fear to tread." But why do brilliant people rush into the same territory? The answer has to deal with evolution. As a non-scientist I am not fool enough to rush into that territory. I continue to listen.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.