Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By Barry Leiba | May 22nd 2009 10:00 AM | 10 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More Staring At Empty Pages articles

All

About Barry Leiba

I’m a computer software researcher, and I'm currently working independently on Internet Messaging Technology. I retired at the end of February... Full Bio

Recently, I was discussing the relative virtues of four-door and two-door cars with a friend. I prefer four-door cars, because they make it much easier for back-seat passengers to get in and out (they make it easier to access the back seat, in general). My friend prefers two-door cars, because he seldom has back-seat passengers, and the larger doors of two-door cars make it easier for the front-seat occupants to get in and out.

“But,” I say, “on a two-door car, the doors are larger and heavier. Also, if you’re in a limited space, the doors can’t open as far, and the smaller opening actually makes it harder for the people in the front seat.”

I also recently read Kate Nowak’s post “Introducing Right Triangle Trig”, from her blog f(t) [Function of Time].[1]

Putting the two together, I thought it would be fun[2] to turn the car-door discussion into a trig problem.

Suppose I park my car in a garage. The side of the car is some fixed distance from the garage wall, limiting the amount that the door can open. Figure 1 illustrates that: the car is parked at a distance of a from the wall (because mathematicians like to confuse things by representing everything with incomprehensible letters), the door has a length of d, and when the edge of the door hits the wall, the angle the door makes with the car is t. (Click on the figures to enlarge them.)

Figure 1
Figure 1

What we want to know is how big the opening (o, in figure 1) is, so we know how easy it will be for a person to get in when the door is as far open as it can be. Noting that the closed-door position, the open door, and the opening form a triangle, we bet we can sort this out with trigonometry.

The first step is to drop a line from the tip of the door to the car, perpendicular to the car. The dashed line labelled a in figure 2 forms a right triangle.

Figure 2
Figure 2

With respect to angle t, the opposite side has length a and the hypotenuse has length d. The sine of the angle, sin(t), is the opposite side divided by the hypotenuse, or a/d. So we have our first formula, which we can solve for t:


sin(t) = a / d

t = arcsin(a / d)


Now we’ll note that the two sides of length d form an isosceles triangle with base o. That means that if we bisect angle t we’ll get two equivalent right triangles (figure 3).

Figure 3
Figure 3

We now have an angle t/2, a hypotenuse d, and an opposite side o/2, giving us our second formula, which we can solve for o:


sin(t / 2) = (o / 2) / d

o = 2 * d * sin(t / 2)


It’s time to plug in the numbers.

Let’s assume that a four-door car’s front door is 4 feet long, and a two-door car’s door is 6 feet long. And let’s say we park the car 3 feet from the wall. So, for a 4-door car:


a = 36 in, d = 48 in

sin(t) = 36 in / 48 in

t = arcsin(36 / 48) = arcsin(.75) = 48.59 degrees

sin(48.59 / 2) = (o / 2) / 48 in

o = 2 * 48 in * sin(24.295) = 2 * 48 in * .41143 = 39.5 in


And for a 2-door car:
a = 36 in, d = 72 in

sin(t) = 36 in / 72 in

t = arcsin(36 / 72) = arcsin(.5) = 30.00 degrees

sin(30 / 2) = (o / 2) / 72 in

o = 2 * 72 in * sin(15) = 2 * 72 in * .25882 = 37.27 in


So, though the door on the two-door car is longer, with the wall restricting it the door will create an opening that’s about two and a quarter inches (5.6%) smaller. That’s actually less of a difference than I’d expected. It was good to do the exercise, which showed that I was right... but not by enough to matter.
 


[1] I love that blog name!

[2] Demonstrating, as it does, why we mathematicians are in such demand at parties.



Comments

logicman's picture
Barry: you were right.  And it does matter.  I'm a beanpole, but I've noticed this gap problem.  As for my more robust friends, for them the angle subtended by the inhuman door hinge is a positive obstacle.  I've known people get out of the car, close the door and then push the car into the garage.  Is this perhaps some ploy by the auto industry to combat obesity?

Gerhard Adam's picture

Actually you might be more correct than you think.  While the opening doesn't reflect much difference, it also doesn't consider that the longer door also has a much sharper angle for getting into the driver's seat (since the extra two feet on the two-door vehicle are only for access to the rear seat).

Therefore if I consider that the driver's seat is in the same position in both vehicles and draw a line perpendicular to the car (since that's the angle my body would have to be to get in the driver's seat), it seems that the four-door vehicle would have about 27-28 inches, while the two-door only has 14 inches available.

I just made a quick assumption that the seat occupied 32 inches (i.e. 2/3 of the four door space) and would be the same position for the two-door vehicle




logicman's picture
I've been mulling this over and I have another thought on this.  Not everybody has a garage.  However, the door-check device limits the amount of room for entry and exit.  It seems to me that a mandatory maximum for door openings would help fight the spread of obesity, and may have greater long-term benefits than just making cars more energy efficient.  ;)

Gerhard Adam's picture
It might add a whole new dimension to the idea of living in one's car.

Hank's picture
Modern economics has already done that.   10 years ago poor people couldn't afford to drive a Cadillac.  Now they can afford to live in one.

logicman's picture
Hey!  Schoolkids!  Trigonometry is a lot more fun than hiding grandma's false teeth!

rholley's picture
Now that's what I call applied mathematics!  If your appetite for this sort of thing is gargantuan, then may I tempt you with this morsel:


Lie bracket motion is most evident in the process of parallel parking a car. This system is underactuated because we only have 2 control inputs, the driving velocity and the steering velocity, yet, as we know from experience, we can rotate the car, and in the case of parallel parking, move the car in a direction perpendicular to the wheel directions. It’s as if some superhero came and pushed the car sideways into the parking spot. This is in direct violation of the nonholonomic constraint conditions.

This is from Biomimetic Sensing for Robotic Manipulation by Neil Petroff, Ph. D. Candidate, University of Notre Dame.  If you're not familiar with Lie brackets, the cheeriest thing on the web I could find to give you a taster is: http://www.control.lth.se/~funonlin/2006/fu_lec_LIE_FRT075_2006fourslides.pdf

Back to Notre Dame, though.  After that speech of President Obama majoring on induced abortion, some people will need more than Lie Brackets to direct their manoeuvering, methinks.


Johannes Koelman's picture
It occurs to me that my obese aunt (featuring a  circular cross-section of 36.1" diameter)  won't be impressed by the above math... :) 

I recently "down-sized" to a sports car which you literally must "climb out out of" to egress rather than "climb down from" as most SUVs are now. It creates an interesting, unfamiliar and amusingly uncomfortable body kinematics with most American passengers.

As Patrick says, the implications of the demographic distribution obesity seem to be pretty central.

Hank's picture
I downgraded to a 2-seater sports car when my wife was pregnant.    The implications of the demographic distribution of pregnant wives on 2-seater car choice shouldn't be discounted either.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.