Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By Barry Leiba | September 9th 2009 11:21 AM | 4 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More Staring At Empty Pages articles

All

About Barry Leiba

I’m a computer software researcher, and I'm currently working independently on Internet Messaging Technology. I retired at the end of February... Full Bio

AT&T iPhone - FAILSome turns of events in the technology world are truly surprising.

Who knew that a couple of guys starting up Google would hit it as big as they did? Who imagined that Facebook or Twitter would turn into sensations? Who had any inkling about how successful the iPhone would be?

OK, that last one... not so much.

From the day it was announced, the iPhone was a pre-release sensation. One didn’t need one’s finger on the pulse of technology to see how popular it was going to be, and to predict that its popularity would go beyond even what Apple, despite its irrepressible optimism, expected when they announced it. And it didn’t take a Nobel laureate to guess that the crush would continue with each new version of the phone.

It seems, though, that the planners at AT&T’s wireless division had their collective finger somewhere decidedly far from anyone’s pulse. Their network is overwhelmed by the success of the iPhone,

“It’s so slow, it feels like I’m on a dial-up modem,” he said. Shazam, an application that identifies songs being played on the radio or TV, takes so long to load that the tune may be over by the time the app is ready to hear it. On numerous occasions, Mr. Sbicca says, he missed invitations to meet friends because his text messages had been delayed.

And picking up a cell signal in his apartment? “You hit the dial button and the phone just sits there, saying it’s connecting for 30 seconds,” he said.


Now, there’s no question that these devices put a tremendous load on the communication system. There’s no question that a lot of added infrastructure is needed in order to have enough capacity to support them. It’s clear that this is a big task, and an expensive one. And, perhaps most significantly, it takes time — more time than we’d like — to go through red tape and approvals to build new cellular towers, and whatnot, however fast they might want to add more. But...

None of this snuck up on AT&T. They should have been working on building their network up for this in the time between their deal with Apple and the announcement of the iPhone in January, 2007. Failing that, they should have started when they saw how much enthusiasm the announcement generated before the release of the first phone at the end of June, 2007. They should certainly have gone whole hog on it when they realized that every man, woman, and child within a two-day drive of an Apple store was camped out on the street for a week, hoping to buy three of them.

About a year after the first phone went on sale, the 3G version came out, in July, 2008. The new, updated 3GS came out this June, and there were more than 20 million iPhones out there before the 3GS release.

And AT&T’s network is not only not ready: it’s enormously, spectacularly not ready. It’s not even close to being ready any time soon. And this despite its promises to the contrary well over a year ago, before the first 3G iPhone was sold:

How fast will the new iPhone run on AT&T’s 3G network?

Plenty fast, according to promises made by AT&T mobility chief Ralph de la Vega at Morgan Stanley’s annual Communications Conference on Wednesday [14 May, 2008].

[...]

Throughput of 7.2 Mbps would put the 3G iPhone within spitting distance of Wi-Fi speeds, which typically run between 6.5 Mbps and 20 Mbps.

But de la Vega didn’t stop there. According to [AppleInsider’s Katie] Marsal, he told the Morgan Stanley audience that sometime in 2009 the company will transition to HSPA release 7, which could deliver speeds “exceeding 20 megabits per second.”


Such life-enhancing speeds might indeed be supported by their network, if only one could convince everyone else to shut their phones off. Otherwise....



Comments

adaptivecomplexity's picture
So hopefully this kind of thing might provide grounds for Apple to get in touch with some other providers. At some point, AT&T's network problems should amount to a violation of the agreement with Apple, one would think.

AT&T likes to point the finger at Apple but it's very common for AT&T to lag behind delivering voicemails. Sometimes it takes hours or even days. The final straw for me was when AT&T delayed delivering a voicemail to me for over 24 hours which ended up costing me a contract job and hundreds of dollars in income.

THAT is not Apple's fault. That blame falls squarely in AT&T's lap. As for me, I'm unlocking my iPhone soon and will not purchase another one until it's available on another carrier. I will not give AT&T another dime.

Hank's picture
Apple chose the one who would pay the most and agree to their terms - the customer experience was secondary.  If Apple was as great as anon thinks they are, they wouldn't have locked it to one carrier.   I have a Verizon brick (Samsung Omnia) so it is a different problem - their network is fine but their phones and service are crap.

barryleiba's picture
A lot of the dissatisfaction — with AT&T, with Verizon, with Sprint, whatever — comes from the fact that we in the U.S. have this bizarre lock-in system, multiple wireless networks (at least we're down to CDMA and GSM now, with TDMA and iDEN largely gone), and other anti-competitive aspects.  In Europe, pretty much everything is GSM, and there's no carrier lock on the phones.  The carriers have to work to keep your business, or else you'll just buy a SIM from someone else, stick it in your phone, and say goodbye to the carrier you haven't been happy with.

Here, we're stuck with two-year lock-in contracts and such idiocy, and with phones that won't work with other carriers.  That gives the carriers incentives to optimize for things other than customer sat.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.