Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By Randy Borum | May 20th 2009 09:14 PM | 3 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More Social/Behavioral Science & Security articles

All

About Randy Borum

Dr. Randy Borum is Professor in the College of Behavioral and Community Sciences at the University of South Florida, where he holds a joint appointment the College of Public Health.

He recently... Full Bio

In the April 6, 2009 Edition of The Nation, Professor Michael T. Klare has written a rather thoughtful article ("Global Crime Wave?") on how the global economic crisis may be pushing a surge in crime that has a transnational impact.

As primary examples, Klare describes the well-known dramatic and dire situations in places like Mexico and Somalia, but he also points to possible impact in key strategic places like China and Russia. Problems like drug trafficking and maritime piracy are not new, of course, but the rising scale, the degree of associated lethal violence, and the state-nonstate connections make these threats much more complex. The resurgence of "Shining Path" in Peru - which started as a Maoistinsurgent movement in the 1980s - is now, Klare reports, inextricably connected to the region's transnational cocaine trafficking enterprise.

Klare further describes an emergent and growing syndrome of crime, violence and repression in some nations:
"This syndrome--declining employment in the core economy, growing reliance on jobs in marginal enterprises or in an unofficial black-market economy, and rising rates of violent crime leading to increased state repression--is likely to be repeated in a range of other countries suffering from the global economic crisis."

One result of this global crime epidemic, Klare fears, is a backlash of state repression, leading to human right violations (see earlier post on this site about the link between weak states an human rights abuses):

"Wherever one looks, then, the global economic crisis is destined to be accompanied by rising levels of crime, violence and--increasingly--state repression. Worried governments may attempt to forestall the risk of criminal disorder by spending more on law enforcement or, as in the case of China, stepping up the rate executions. In a world on the brink, this is unlikely to deter those like the Somali pirates who "only want money so we can protect ourselves from hunger."

Though there is no simple prescription for this growing crisis, Klare joins a chorus of analysts who suggest that economic development effort and security issues are deeply interconnected and that the international policy community should remain mindful of that connection in developing long-term solutions:
"Without a global stimulus effort aimed at those at greatest risk of destitution, hunger and homelessness, expect an epidemic of global crime and boom times for criminal syndicates and cartels everywhere."

Comments

Hank's picture
I think the correlation-causation arrows are all wrong.    Shining Path became Maoists, for example, because there was a Mao to fund them and they were basically interested in insurgency and needed a reason to start shooting.  Post-Mao they needed a new reason to shoot people and resources to exist so they turned to drugs.  MAO would be laughing - or LMAO'ing in  textspeak.

LMAO shirt

Likewise, there was always crime and the economy in the most dangerous parts of the world is basically unchanged so it won't make them more oppressive or criminal.   In California, a bad economy is going to make the state less oppressive; a whole bunch of prisoners will be let out so that the overstuffed state worker rolls won't be culled.  

Klare sounds like a 1960s analyst; if we just gave everyone money they wouldn't hate anyone else.   Two years ago a whole swath of politicians and activists wanted the US economy to grind to a halt and now that it has, they want to blame that for crime?

rborum's picture

Hank - your characterization (below) does not reflect how I understand Klare (and others') position:

"Klare sounds like a 1960s analyst; if we just gave everyone money they wouldn't hate anyone else. "


I certainly agree with what you imply -  that to think "if we just give everyone money they won't hate anyone else" is not only wrongheaded, but also inconsistent with what we have learned from history and from the social science of conflict.  But I suspect (though I don't know him personally) that Klare would also agree with that premise.


As I understand this element of his argument, it is that governance and development are inseparable from security and that we should consider that connection in developing solutions. 


Gerhard Adam's picture

To throw a bit of an anthropological (or biological) spin on things, it is important to recognize that humans are social animals and have always lived in cooperative groups.  However, it is equally true that these groups survived or died out together.

As human societies evolved into city-states and ultimately nations, these ideas were superceded by the notion of being a cooperative member in ever larger groups.  However, the basic dynamic is the same. 

Therefore when a portion of this group is considered expendable and there isn't enough effort made to address everyone's needs, there will be a sense of betrayal by those finding themselves on the "outside".  So while there's no question that there is genuine evil in the world, often the "criminals" we have to engage are simply responding to competing groups.  In many cases, the difference between the heroes and the villains (when examining the "leaders") is simply one of legality, not necessarily good or bad. 

After all, what is the "black market" except an underground economic force that is seeking to survive in a system that appears to not recognize their need.


It is not my intent to defend or suggest that any such "criminal" actions are justified, but only that there are no social groups that will ever quietly go away simply because it is deemed convenient for them to do so.  Therefore if they are not part of the overall social solution, you can be assured they will be part of the problem.



Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.