Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Fake Banner
By Daniel Ellis | July 27th 2009 06:32 PM | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More A slug's eye view articles

All

About Daniel Ellis

I'm an engineering student at UC Santa Cruz, as well as a physics minor.

I enjoy reading about anything to do with cosmology, astrophysics, particle physics, or any science.

My other pastimes... Full Bio

The phenomenon of Brownian motion (after botanist Robert Brown, who discovered it 1828) was described by Albert Einstein in 1905, when he published his statistical molecular theory of liquids. Brownian motion is basically the random movement of particles within a fluid.  
  
  As a new study by University of Illinois scientists shows, Brownian motion is, perhaps, not as mathematically applicable as previously thought.  Einstein thought if the motions of many particles were watched, and the distance each moved in a certain time were recorded, the distribution would resemble the familiar Gaussian, bell-shaped curve used to assign grades in a science class.  But was Einstein right?
 
   "Like Einstein, we used to think we could describe Brownian motion with a standard bell-shaped curve. But now, with the ability to measure very small distances much more precisely than was possible 100 years ago, we have found that we can have extremes much farther than previously imagined," says Steve Granick, Founder Professor of Engineering, and professor of materials science and engineering, of chemistry, of chemical and biomolecular engineering, and of physics at the U. of Illinois.
 

   Thanks to a century's worth of technological advances, researchers designed two experiments that tested Einstein's theory.

 In the first experiment, beads were moved up and down tiny tubes of lipid molecules by Brownian motion, as researchers observed.   In the second experiment, the researchers watched as the beads diffused through a porous membrane of entangled macromolecule filaments. This, too, followed Brownian motion but Einstein's bell-shaped curve didn't budge in nearly all features of both experiments; there were also features in significant disagreement. The beads moved much farther than predicted by the bell curve in some cases.

Contrary to expectations of Gaussian diffusion behavior, researches witnessed behavior that was exponential.      These new findings mean that we may have rethink the bell curve when addressing future problems.



Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.