Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By Usman Anwer | November 9th 2008 10:36 AM | 2 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More Scientific Tapestry articles

All

About Usman Anwer

I believe that fastest scientific progress comes from multidimensional scientific research and integration of a vast array of sciences, so you will see a lot of diversity in my blogs. I have several... Full Bio

Planet formation, as we all know (and don't know), is chaotic. It is like a lorenz Attractor constructable in computational astrophysics labs. When I was working on my astronomy project at Harvard this summer, I realized that there was a way to zoom into this complex, utterly random phenomenon to get a glimpse of the precise conditions of the proto-planetary disk as it evolved into the 'solar system'.

So what is that 'way' anyway?

According to the widely lauded sequential accretion theory, planet formation occurs in steps - and is governed by simple laws of physics: gravity pulls the disk around the protostar, material clumps together and is swirled into the star, volatile material evaporates to cause pressure differentials, differentials cause the inward swirling to stop, matter gets a chance to clump together, and then turn into Jovian giants, and the process continues. Each step of formation influences the other step, and along the way leaves a trail of the larger evolutionary pattern.

That is what I propose to exploit. For several months I have been working on the problem. I think that this trail is still visible and can be scrutinized to determine the specific environment of the primordial solar system. If the technique I am about to propose now works, we will be able to firm our grip on the long drawn issue of planetary system formation and evolution.

The sequential accretion theory indicates that Jupiter was the first planet to be formed in the solar system, and that it then seeded the formation of Saturn. If this did actually  happen, then the gravitational forces of Saturn must have affected the later evolution of Jupiter itself. By mapping down the significant 'anomalies' in the Jupiter system and then analyzing them, it might be possible to pin point the conditions that caused them to occur; in other words, they can help establish the specific conditions of the proto-plantary disk at that time and the influence Jovian planets have on the entire planetary system.

Detailed study is underway. I am in the process of setting up the mathematical spreadsheets and evolutionary pathways that will help in measuring the degree of gravitational influences of Saturn on Jupiter in the early solar system. As for the 'anomalies' , I think it is way to early to purport them before the calculations and the pathways are complete.

I will try to get the paper ready by mid-December - until then it is midterms, design competitions, alumni presentations, college apps, and other mundane affairs of the earth!

Comments


Muhammad, 


Universal, Galactic, Stellar, Solar and Planetary Systems,  Stabilise as the progenitor  Jetting Cores
lose their ability to jet at escape velocities. Our larger planets / planetary cores,  were most likely jetted by the Sun first.  Also they were  jetted in pairs,   (  most likely, matching Pairs )  and  these planets  would possess similar masses  (As the planets are an `effect `  of   twin jets  jetting )  .  
The solar core was  originally  much more massive  than it is at present,   and prior to jetting  the  planetary cores of the Solar System,  it  may have previously jetted  extra - solar bodies,  that  permanently vacated the solar system.   Such a bodies   are no doubt   orbiting the Galaxy. (  see Warren Browne Harvard cfa.   Hypervelocity Stars. )  (and possibly Hypervelocity Black Holes )

 In the case of the  Solar core mass,   its  angular  momentum  would  have  rapidly degraded,  following  a  series of  major   jetting  events.   Bear in mind  jetting ,  refers to  twin identical  streams of   core mass ejecta accompanied by fuzing plasma.   As  jetted  ejecta  loses  linear momentum,  and  is inserted into orbit,   it will coagulate into spherical configured planetary cores. Just as a skater    loses angular   momentum , and   spins more slowly,   as he extends his arms,   then the  Suns  Jetting core   also loses angular momentum,   as it  ejects  core mass,    and  this  loss of  angular momentum `imprints itself ` upon  subsequent jetted bodies,   which will   not now  reach  such   high  altitudes,   as  the jet vector component   (how  high the jets can jet )   also degrades,   (relative to the Sun)    Coagulated ejecta , and plasma  will  therefore  assume much  lower  orbits.   )  The Earths  Core,   apparently,  was jetted comparatively late  as the Solar System formed.
The Sun  thankfully, now has assumed a  stable  platform,  and  apparently  can  no longer endanger Earth,  as the core ejecta  can no longer  reach  escape  velocity,  and can only  attain  sub orbital velocity. This is a decaying orbit  which recycles all jetted  ejecta,   where infalling debris  smashes  and fragments the suns   winding spiral  contrails,  into sunspots.

    Kevin Wilson



rholley's picture
The Lorenz Attractor

I remember the time (1994 or thereabouts) when Ed Lorenz came to give the inaugural lecture at the newly opened Meteorology building at Reading University.  (I've just been watching a more recent inaugural speech!)  Fun stuff!  As an example of chaos in meteorology he compared two years with indistinguishable summer weather: one went on to a beautiful autumn, the other exactly the opposite.

But at the first reading, I thought you were talking about Lorentz of the Lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction and the Lorentz transformation.  Now that (and special relativity in general) gives me something of a headache.

All the best for your forthcoming paper!


Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.