Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By Kimberly Crandell | March 27th 2009 11:30 AM | 12 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More The Science of Motherhood articles

All

About Kimberly Crandell

I'm a mother of three, with an aeronautical engineering degree.  Although it's been a while since I've done any aircraft design, there are surprising applications of


... Full Bio

This Saturday night, a global effort is set to take place to promote energy conservation – the 3rd annual Earth Hour. To join in on the effort, simply turn off your lights from 8:30 – 9:30pm in your local time zone. This worldwide effort is designed to demonstrate that each person has a choice in their energy consumption - and at any time can simply choose to use less.

Turning off your lights is an easy way to reduce your energy usage, as well as reduce your energy bill. But as with many things, it’s always more fun to do it with friends. So 8:30-9:30pm on March 28th 2009 has been designated as the specific time when people and cities around the world will dim their lights to show their acknowledgement that sometimes little actions can have big impacts.

Earth Hour

Some 2,400 cities in 82 countries have signed up to participate, six times more than last year. Some of the landmarks scheduled to go dark include the Great Pyramids and Sphinx in Egypt, Acropolis in Greece, Broadway Theater marquees, the Las Vegas strip, Eiffel Tower in Paris, Moscow State University and the Petronas Towers in Kuala Lumpur.

Earth Hour began in Sydney in 2007, when 2.2 million homes and businesses switched off their lights for one hour. In 2008 the message had grown into a global sustainability movement, with 50 million people switching off their lights. Global landmarks such as the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco, Rome’s Colosseum, the Sydney Opera House and the Coca Cola billboard in Times Square all stood in darkness.

This year however, Earth Hour has been transformed from being just a sign of solidarity regarding energy conservation, to a “global vote.” The organizers of this year’s event are publicizing participation in the event as a vote “For Earth and Against Global Warming”. According to Earth Hour sponsor WWF (that’s the World Wildlife Fund, not the World Wrestling Federation),

”For the first time in history, people of all ages, nationalities, race and background have the opportunity to use their light switch as their vote – Switching off your lights is a vote for Earth, or leaving them on is a vote for global warming. WWF are urging the world to VOTE EARTH and reach the target of 1 billion votes, which will be presented to world leaders at the Global Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen 2009. This meeting will determine official government policies to take action against global warming, which will replace the Kyoto Protocol. It is the chance for the people of the world to make their voice heard.”


This may be a little harder pill for participants to swallow, because the concept of global warming is still about as controversial as the realism of WWF events (this time I’m referring to the World Wrestling Federation, not the World Wildlife Fund). Although carbon emissions are on the rise, its overall impact to the world climate is still a topic of fierce debate.

Earth Hour Tree
Even trees are getting in on the act

Some scientists are confident that the temperature increases we are experiencing are all within normal heating and cooling trends that have been occurring for centuries, long before industrialization was ever an issue. Other scientific bodies have stated unequivocally that global warming is occurring, and people are causing it by burning fossil fuels – and the only debate about global warming is about how much and how fast warming will continue as a result of heat-trapping emissions

Simpsons - Global Warmin Is A Myth!

As a result of this controversy, not everyone agrees with the message of Earth Hour - and at least one counter-protest is planned for Saturday. Suburban Philadelphia ice cream shop owner Bob Gerenser, 56, believes global warming is based on faulty science and calls Earth Hour "nonsense.” The resident of New Hope, PA, and owner of Gerenser's Exotic Ice Cream planned to illuminate his store with extra theatrical lighting.

"I'm going to get everyone I know in my neighborhood to turn on every light they possibly can to waste as much electricity as possible to underline the absurdity of this action ... by being absurd."


Despite the controversy over "global warming" or climate change, I personally think that energy conservation is never a bad thing. So the lights will go out in our house for an hour on Saturday, for no other reason than to remind my family that at any time we can choose to reduce our energy usage by simply flicking a switch.

Comments

Enjoyed your post about Earth Hour-- and wanted to share a video that my group "YERT" created about the event: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qg86XBQ5e5Q . YERT stands for "Your Environmental Road Trip" and we descended on the capitol last year to see what was going on for the big day. And, well... we'll let the video sum it up. ;-)

Peace,
Mark

Kimberly Crandell's picture
Loved it!  Thanks for the video.  I especially enjoyed the sound of someone tripping over something in the dark because all the lights were out - lol.  (Um, hope he's okay)  P.S. - I think candles are acceptable, but this year you may want to light them first, and then turn out the lights.

Thanks!! Glad you enjoy. We certainly had fun making it. And we'll be sure to light the candles first this year. ;-)

Peace,
Mark

adaptivecomplexity's picture
This worries me a little: sure, we'll reduce our energy consumption for an hour, but what happens nine months later, when the world population surges as a result of, well, people doing what they typically do when it's dark and there's not much else going on...?

Kimberly Crandell's picture
Hmmm... good point.  Maybe there should be a follow-up event... "Birth Day."

Michael's comment gets at a more serious point, which is that every decision has opportunity costs. It's one thing to be in favor of energy conservation, but the issue is less straight-forward when you consider what people have to give up: Should shops, restaurants & bars have to close & tell employees not to come in? Should TV stations lose profits from ads aired during earth hour? It's understood that earth hour is just meant to symbolize the choice we have in energy-utilization, but in complying with it, it also represents the opportunities that we're giving up by spending less energy as well.

(I would also be interested in how this affects power supply, as whole cities turn back on their lights at the same time when it's over.)

Fossil Huntress's picture
A valid comment Michael. We've seen similar outcomes in Winnipeg. Many an offspring arises from a dark moment or long, cold winter.

Fossil Huntress's picture
I love the pictures you've chosen Kimberly. Perfect!

16 and a half trillion tons of carbon in the atmo, growing at half a percent a year.

How much carbon would we save if no one in the US turned their lights on ever again? Maybe 2% of that.

16 and a half trillion is wildly innaccurate.

The worldwide hourly emission of carbon dioxide is 16 million tons, maybe that's what you meant.

My question is: 'So what?'

Does anyone know what kind of effect carbondioxide really has? No!

I am not saying that producing that much carobon dioxide is good or irrelevant. I just want to remind you that there is no faulty science or correct science. Science is about models and the choice of models creates the results. Most people just repeat what they are being told is fact when there is no such thing in large-scale, long-term climate modeling. Most scicentists or pseudo-scientists mistake correlation for causation. Climate change is a political and economic subject and not a scientific one. It used to be global warming, but as the proof for causal global warming is slowly eroding we now call it climate change. Well, the climate has always been changing as any high-school graduate should know. The question would be if it is changing any different than it would be without human influence. The glaciers might be receeding anyway. All of that is not meant to say that we should continue to do what we do.

Let me remind you that our most serious problem IS NOT climate change. It is overpopulation and there we behave even more irrational by sending food and medicine to the third world to speed it up. Once the oceans will be dead and there won't be enough food, the resultant biological migration pressure on the affected population will be immense. Read Edward O. Wilson and be stunned ...

I follow - & agree w/ - your first paragraph.

But I'm not sure how overpopulation is a problem. According to Ehrlich, that problem was supposed to occur a few decades ago, wiping out the majority of humanity by now.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.