Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By Hank Campbell | June 16th 2009 06:43 PM | 6 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More Science 2.0 articles

All

About Hank Campbell

A wise man once said Darwin had the greatest idea anyone ever had. Others may prefer Newton or Archimedes.

Probably no one ever said a website was the greatest idea anyone ever had, but a website... Full Bio

Darwin didn't miss much, I think we all agree, and came up with a lot given the limited science of his day.   One thing he missed, that by this time tomorrow will be the source of outrageous titles from every schlock science publication in existence, was that sexual selection that goes on even after actual sex.

Confusing?  It's not so difficult to understand.   Some female critters are trampy and have sex with more than one guy, for example (what, you think other parts of the animal kingdom don't have Jenna Jameson?)  so there's sperm competition but there are also other factors having to do with the internal workings of the female body (i.e. that magical place), so let's catalog a few of post-copulatory sexual selection's greatest hits:

* Male genitalia that “sing” during copulation

* Seminal fluid that invades the female's nervous system and influences her behavior

* Male genitalia that explodes or breaks, leaving parts behind  

* 'Dirty talk' during animal sex

Have you noticed nature seems to have it in for male genitalia?

It was almost 100 years after Darwin's seminal(*) book on sexual selection, "The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex", that a researcher in Biological Reviews(1) stated that sexual selection occurred after the fact too.  How did Darwin miss it?  Well, he wasn't perfect, so it may have made logical sense (an animal that can remove the sperm of a prior suitor has a reproduction advantage, for example) but he didn't have any way to scientifically know it.

By 1983, 'cryptic female choice' was the highlight of an article in The American Naturalist(2) but it didn't get a lot of traction until the following decade.   Now there's a whole article in PNAS about it - rodents, flatworms, spiders, primates, you name it and there's some interesting male genitalia to talk about and some sexually antagonistic coevolution going on.

But it isn't just animals, post-copulatory sexual selection is happening in plants also.   Aren't many plants hermaphroditic, you ask?  Sure, but that means sexual selection has to avoid self-pollination and postcopulatory selection can help avoid strange hybrids.

It may seem counterintuitive to humans that a fly starts conversation and foreplay after sex has begun but nature has a plan.  
Male insects and spiders use virtually all parts of their bodies as they tap, slam, squeeze, bite, lick, rub, shake, gently rock, or twist the female, coat her with liquid, cover her eyes with semitransparent colored plates, wrap her symbolically in weak silken lines, feed her, wave at her, and sing to her 

It sounds downright sexy.  For her.  For the male, it is a lot more work.

Darwin's omission?  Maybe.  Or maybe he knew he needed to leave a few things for future biologists and he didn't want postcopulatory sexual selection concern to be one more way to add pressure to date night.

Article: William G. Eberhard, 'Postcopulatory sexual selection: Darwin's omission and its consequences', Published online before print June 15, 2009, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901217106

NOTES:

(*)  HA HA
(1) Parker GA (1970) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences. Biol Rev 45:525–567
(2) Thornhill R (1983) Cryptic female choice and its implications in the scorpionfly Harpobittacus nigriceps. Am Nat 122:765–788

Comments

logicman's picture
Darwin lived in an age of enlightenment in which he had no fear of violence from the church.  But had he gone into the more minute details of sexual reproduction he would surely have had his house burned down by Victorian prudes, with him in it.  No man of that era would have had the cojones to write like Kate Chopin.

adaptivecomplexity's picture
I see you beat me to the piece. I'm going to have to top this - and it ain't going to be pretty.

Hank's picture
I couldn't pass this up, but you probably know a lot more bizarre sexual habits than I do.   I can't wait to see what Scientific American makes of this, though.  None of us have their imaginations when it comes to sexing up science.

adaptivecomplexity's picture
you probably know a lot more bizarre sexual habits than I do.


I'm not quite sure what you're implying there...

jtwitten's picture
I believe that he is implying that thou art a Super Freak, a Super Freak, your Super Freaky. . .

Hank's picture
Hey, he lives in St. Louis.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.