Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By Hank Campbell | February 2nd 2009 10:38 PM | 12 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More Science 2.0 articles

All

About Hank Campbell

A wise man once said Darwin had the greatest idea anyone ever had. Others may prefer Newton or Archimedes.

Probably no one ever said a website was the greatest idea anyone ever had, but a website... Full Bio

I should be able to get this Hollywood movie made in two paragraphs.  

*****

A likable rogue-ish historian ( Hank Campbell, only in tweed, we might describe him, Harrison Ford being a little long in the tooth for action films these days) is poring over antique tomes, including an original draft copy of  On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life when he notices a very faint trace of eraser markings on the title page.    He does some kind of magic chemical stuff (whatever - it's a movie) and discovers it is a number.    

Just for fun, he goes to the corresponding page number in the book and finds something that never made it into the published version - a map of the world with a cartesian overlay and Darwin's title written underneath.   Below those are the following numbers:

10 -5  5  -2  10  6   7   1   -4   5   or  5  -1  5   12   -13   16   14  -4   14   8 (1)

He spends some time thinking about it and suddenly it comes to him - the realization of a conspiracy about the greatest idea anyone ever had. As his eyes open wide in shock, a biologist appears menacingly in the window behind him, an Edgar Renteria bobblehead doll dipped in agar menacingly in hand, and he raises it to strike ... 

******

Mr. Hollywood Mogul is on the edge of his seat, wondering what the mystery is all about at that point, we assume, as would be the viewing audience.     You see, our action-adventurer historian has discovered that evolution, that without which nothing in biology makes any sense, is actually a huge worldwide conspiracy and Big Biology will do anything to keep it a secret.   Even murder with an Edgar Renteria collectible.



Sounds too ridiculous, right?   Well, that's because it is.   For as much as we might be concerned about groups that are attempting to discredit evolution, the plain fact is there are limits to what the public is willing to believe.   Jesus had a girlfriend and an art historian figured it out?    Sure, the audience will go for that sort of fantasy and even buy into Opus Dei assassins and government payoffs and that Audrey Tautou could ever possibly have a romantic interest in a guy the age of Tom Hanks (well, the audience only sort of bought that).

Audrey Tautou


But what movie fans call 'suspension of disbelief' is not open season on logic and reality and a movie whose premise is a conspiracy to block out a competing theory that explains life does not fall into something that would be anything but laughable.(2)   Yes, people who can believe in Area 51 would puncture holes in the notion of a vast conspiracy to contain the real truth about how we came to be.

Why so?   Many of you may know a scientist.   If you're reading this site you may even be a scientist.  In either case, you know  that scientists are  competitive, rebellious and downright condescending when it comes to knowledge.    They may have some  sort of tolerance level for outside people pontificating about their discipline, because they understand not everyone has a PhD, but they have zero patience for people inside their field who say stupid things, do stupid things or try to put forth a scientific argument using argumentum ad verecundiam logic - appealling to authority.  Let's be honest; cocaine-fueled cats have an easier time being herded than scientists.

Scientists are also pretty smart so they know that any one of them who  can (a) disprove evolution using science rather than insisting that missing pieces of puzzles matter more than trillions of existing ones or (b) prove God created life is going to get a Nobel Prize the size of the Statue of Liberty and a guest spot on the Colbert Report any time they want.  

Scientists are still human and loyalty to a guy dead two centuries back  isn't going to go very far in front of a faculty committee, but being the guy who settled the science/religion debate will find his NIH budget overflowing with grant mana from heaven in a way that stupefies anyone not currently sucking on the Johns Hopkins government teat.  That's motivation enough to betray any conspiracy.    

Opponents of evolution make a key error in misunderstanding the mentality of the science mind.   In evolution there are a number of processes at work, like  natural selection, speciation, common ancestry, genetic drift and more, and biologists argue over the relative importance of each.   Detractors of evolution will spin that to mean evolution is a theory without a foundation, that is in dispute, because religious people are not allowed dissent - if  The Pope does not speak Ex Cathedra, you are not Catholic, for example.     But science is not religion.    In science, a debate either reinforces the correctness of the theory or it allows a new one to take its place.    Natural selection is sitting at over 150 years and hasn't gone away yet  and it's not like it got a free ride along the way.    Evolution was accepted well before Natural Selection.

So it went with Mendal's genetics, Wegener's continental drift and Einstein's Relativity.     No secret cabal existed to suppress any of those things, they just had to stand up to rigorous investigation first.

There are conspiracies that are at least plausible, like Franklin Delano Roosevelt allowing the Japanese to bomb Pearl Harbor, and then there are others so unbelievable you just start laughing, like a secret society that meets in a place called 'The Meadows' and controls the world.
(3)   Guess which camp a secret agenda to support evolution falls under?

The only reason conspiracy stories work at all is if there exists a plausible thread.   It doesn't have to be believable, just plausible.     A conspiracy to prop up evolution fails that second one because it doesn't meet even the most basic sniff test - it is in defiance of the nature of scientists.    

Unfortunately that means I don't get my starring role in a movie but I can make myself available if you can find enough true believers and they want to fund it anyway.

I bet I look great in tweed.

30 Days Of Evolution Blogging is the brainchild of Mike White and the rest of us are just along for the ride and to show him support. By all means, pitch in and write about Darwin and evolution too.

NOTES:

(1)   Bonus points if you take the time to figure it out.  Use an anagram of the title of Darwin's book and I just gave you the cipher key.   I'll leave the solution in a comment tomorrow.

(2) I got an email reminding me such a movie did actually get made - "Expelled" - which further proves my point about how quickly crazy silly movie plots are forgotten. No tweed action heroes in that though, I am told, so there is still hope for me.

(3) "The Queen, The Vatican, The Gettys, The Rothschilds, *and* Colonel Sanders before he went tits up."


Comments

Hank's picture
My favorite part of that clip, and it's funnier because it happens throughout the movie, is Anthony LaPaglia losing it while Myers does his thing.    I am reasonably sure I could create a bot that spoke in nothing but clips from this movie and no one would notice.

jtwitten's picture
There are conspiracies that are at least plausible, like Franklin Delano Roosevelt allowing the Japanese to bomb Pearl Harbor

Actually, the plausibility of that one is post hoc.  One would have to assume that FDR was a prescient genius on naval strategy and tactics, unless you also assume that losing the Pacific War was part of the plan.  If it was a conspiracy, the battleships would not have been in the harbor, the aircraft carriers would have been.  Coral Sea and Midway had not happened yet.

Hank's picture
Right.  Unlikely, unbelievable but at least plausible.   A group of biologists willing to agree to bolster Darwin if they all know evolution is invalid is not even that.    You won't even agree to use the decimal system without objection; now imagine trying to get 100,000 guys like you to buy into a theory that isn't science fact.  :)

jtwitten's picture
In the spirit of contrariness, I choose to use less absolute terms.  An evolution conspiracy is much less plausible than a Pearl Harbor conspiracy, which in of itself has an extremely low prior plausibility.

I think I just proved your point.

adaptivecomplexity's picture
cocaine-fueled cats have an easier time being herded than scientists.

That's probably the most devastating refutation of the conspiracy argument right there. Just ask any department chair.

rholley's picture
That's a superb piece of CONCOCTIONISM, a word I have occasionally used on the web:

First, to describe the idea that the basics of Christian Doctrine were "cooked up" at the orders of the emperor Constantine in order to control the empire better, or the similar idea that the first five books of the Bible were likewise "casseroled" in Babylon during the exile, in order the keep the remaining Jews separate.

Secondly, to describe the ideas of Edward Said with his "Orientalism".  He seemed to imply that naughty pictures of Middle Eastern women were part of a plot by the "Filthy British" or their French equivalent to denigrate the inhabitants of the Middle East so as to justify their subjugation.

Interestingly, a former colleague, who was an easy target for "Counterknowledge", believed that Christianity was invented by a bunch of bishops about 300 AD, while he could not see how a particular pattern of bee-attractive dots on three out of the eight rays (or "petals") of a South African daisy could have evolved.  He is missing the point-as-I-see-it.  To me the marvellous thing is that a (probably simple) bit of genetic coding could make this pattern, rather than it being "found out" through mutation and natural selection.

Chris Rollins's picture
All I got from this post is that Darwin could herd cocaine-fueled cats. That was the point, right?

Becky Jungbauer's picture
That's what I took from it. But honestly, cat food-fueled cats are hard enough to herd as it is, so why add a stimulant? Just more claws, more hissing. No thanks.

Hank's picture
Fine, clearly no one gives a hoot about the super-secret coded message contained in On The Origin that sent Big Biology on the trail of our intrepid hero so I will just go ahead and reveal it:


O     T   O   O   S      B  M   O   N   S      T   P    O   F      R     I    T       S    F    L
10  -5   5   -2  10    6   7   1   -4   5      5   -1   5  12   -13 16  14    -4  14    8
Y     o    u    l     l      s    h   o     o    t      y    o   u   r       e     y    e       o    u     t
 
My clever homage to Ralphie's long awaited Orphan Annie decoder pin message in "A Christmas Story" - I hope you are as disappointed as he was.


adaptivecomplexity's picture
Wow, I totally missed that one. The Origin of Species is even cooler than I thought.

Becky Jungbauer's picture
Obviously someone has the wrong decoder pin from Little Orphan Annie's radio show.

"Be sure to drink your Ovaltine. Ovaltine? A crummy commercial? Son of a bitch!"

There's a Star Trek version of a "genetic DaVinci Code."

See "The Chase."
http://www.amazon.com/Star-Trek-Generation-Episode-Chase/dp/0792147375

/b

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.