Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By Josh Witten | November 4th 2009 11:08 AM | 3 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More Rugbyologist articles

All

About Josh Witten

100% of this the rugbyologist's revenue is donated to Doctors Without Borders (Medecins Sans Frontieres). A click on one of my articles is a click that helps bring high quality medical care to the... Full Bio

As you may or may not be aware, The Columbus Dispatch (the only major newspaper left in my hometown) recently got my dander up by publishing an anti-H1N1 vaccine screed by a Dr. Phillip DeMio that completely misrepresents the science surrounding vaccine safety without checking the accuracy of his claims or presenting an opposing viewpoint. As a medical doctor, DeMio was given a forum to advocate courses of action that are not supported by the evidence or leading public health authorities and encourage risky behavior is some of the most vulnerable groups.

Despite some arguments that fact-checking of letters to the editor is inappropriate, The Columbus Dispatch does reserve the right to edit letters for accuracy, as detailed in the response one receives to a letter submission:
We reserve the right to edit letters for accuracy, clarity, length and taste.

My dander was in such an up-dander state that I could not get to sleep last night until I had tippity-tapped a missive (notice my trademark aggression has been toned down to match the venue) to The Dispatch editors pointing out DeMio's inaccuracies. The text of my letter (sans personal contact information), after some not-middle-of-the-night editing, is below:
To Whom It May Concern:

Careful consideration of the benefits and risks of medical treatments requires the best scientific evidence. Therefore, I read Dr. Phillip DeMio’s misrepresentation of H1N1 vaccine safety in his October 27, 2009 letter (“Better think before getting H1N1 vaccine”) with disappointment.
 
Contrary to Dr. DeMio's assertion that the risk of severe side effects from the H1N1 vaccine is “high”, the scientific evidence shows that the risks are very low, especially compared to the risks posed by H1N1 influenza. Furthermore, two antivirals (Tamiflu and Relenza), not five, have evidence for efficacy against H1N1. H1N1 is already resistant to one antiviral (amantadine) – a risk of antiviral overuse.

Accurate information on these topics is publicly available from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (http://www.cdc.gov/H1N1FLU/). This information is not in dispute among experts.

My greater disappointment, however, is with The Dispatch. The “Letters to the Editor” section is an important public forum for the exchange of opinions on the issues of the day. When opinions are expressed based on a misrepresentation of the facts, especially those addressing public health issues, without opposition or clarification, The Dispatch has failed in its responsibility to create a space for intelligent and informed debate. 

Sincerely,
Joshua T. Witten
Doctoral Candidate in Molecular Cell Biology
Washington University School of Medicine
Former resident of Dublin and Upper Arlington, OH

Evidence and recommendations from the CDC can be found in the links from their H1N1 site. A partial list of references to the scientific literature on vaccine efficacy, safety, and autism can be found here.


Comments

Nicely done. Don't get your hopes up, but yours was a timely and well reasoned response. Thank you.

jtwitten's picture
The Central Ohioans for Rational Inquiry have also sent in a reply to DeMio (I am trying to get a link to it or permission to post it from CORI) that focuses exclusively on DeMio's misrepresentations of the facts, vaccine safety and efficacy, and thimerosal and squalene in particular. Their letter is directed more to the public than mine and, given a forced choice, I would publish theirs before mine (of course, given the option I would publish both).

Their letter did not address my concerns about the dereliction of duty at The Dispatch, which i felt needed to be addressed. A letter to the editor was the only avenue (that I could find) to chastise the editors directly for their irresponsible behavior and I felt compelled to take it. I am not optimistic that my letter will be published, but, if the editors read it with an open mind and consider my critique, my goals will be achieved.

I am hopeful that many similar letters have been written and that at least one, by force of numbers alone, will be published.

Thank you for the kind encouragement.

Becky Jungbauer's picture
Does your real middle name start with an R?

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.