Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By Josh Witten | May 15th 2009 10:57 AM | 6 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More Rugbyologist articles

All

About Josh Witten

100% of this the rugbyologist's revenue is donated to Doctors Without Borders (Medecins Sans Frontieres). A click on one of my articles is a click that helps bring high quality medical care to the... Full Bio

I feel like I was mislead and would like to apologize to the people who count on me for being gullible and not doing my job.

That is what Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) should have said when she claimed that the CIA misled her about their interrogation techniques.  The CIA and Republicans say, "T'ain't so."  Pre-freaking-dictable.  All around.  While my friend Hayley over at The Alternate Allele has a good argument that it is the responsibility of individuals to avoid getting duped, it is fair to hold the Speaker of the House of Representatives to higher standards than your Average Joe. 

Misled?  In political speak, misled is very different from accusing someone of lying.  Lying to Congress is a crime.  How does one get misled without being lied to?  By being gullible or abdicating the responsibility of asking tough questions until one gets complete answers.  At its best, the scientific method celebrates this process of questions, answers, and debates.  It helps keep the idea space clear of clutter. 

I just came back from an academic conference where every presenter is trying to present their work in the best light possible.  There is definitely potential to be misled.  That is why it is my, and every other scientist's, responsibility to ask tough questions and demand complete answers.  If I am misled by anything short of an outright lie, it is my own damn fault.

Either Pelosi, whose job actually involves national power and responsibility, is either confessing that she is naive, admitting that she failed to do her job by asking tough questions until she gets complete answers, or accusing the CIA briefers of the crime of lying to Congress.   

Comments

Hank's picture
I'm with you.   Her "I am a victim of evil Bush and the CIA too" doesn't really resonate all that well in 2009, given she is the most important person in the House.   She's in a tough spot - it's difficult to sign off on being incompetent or admitting you knew about the bad thing your whole party campaigned against in 2006.

Gerhard Adam's picture

While I agree with you, I actually find less fault with her than the millions of people in this country (and the media) that can't handle the truth.  It's unfortunate, but people are so fickle they have actually set the stage to require "lying" because if they aren't lied to, they will scurry over to someone that tells the better lie and support them.

I've often wondered how things would be if the political leaders just got on television and actually told people the truth "warts and all" and let the chips fall where they will.



jtwitten's picture
While there is truth to the perception of public pressure to give particular answers, when discussing individual responsibility to do anything other than hold individuals responsible for their own actions becomes untenable.  If my others are responsible for my actions, then those others can certainly blame a new set of people for their actions, ad infinitum.

Politicians lie because they care more about keeping or getting a job than about their personal integrity or responsibilities to their constituencies.  In 2002 it was politically expedient to not raise a fuss.  Now it is expedient to shift the responsibility.  Pelosi is either naive, craven, or both.  In this she is not unique, it is just rarely advertised so boldly.

To paraphrase an ethics teacher I once had:
You always have a choice, even when there's a gun to your head.  It's just that sometimes the choices really suck.

Gerhard Adam's picture
No question about it, and I'm certainly not trying to shift blame or absolve Pelosi.

What I am saying, is that we are creating a social pressure that is producing the specific result that we don't want, and if people want things to change, then they're going to have to be willing to create an environment that fosters the behavior we do want.

My point about the media is that it has become a rabid watchdog that serves no purpose except to stir up controversy.  Therefore whether someone should or shouldn't have had more personal integrity, the fact remains that until that environment changes, I'm not going to hold my breath waiting for the miracle of ethics to appears.

jtwitten's picture
What I am saying, is that we are creating a social pressure that is
producing the specific result that we don't want, and if people want
things to change, then they're going to have to be willing to create an
environment that fosters the behavior we do want.

Since the environment is composed of individuals, the only way to change it is for individuals to demand integrity and criticize when they don't get it.

Gerhard Adam's picture
... and not be so fickle when they are told the truth.  I agree, but as I said ... I'm not holding my breath.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.