Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Fake Banner
By Justin Gerke | December 3rd 2008 03:31 PM | 2 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More Redneck Genetics articles

All

About Justin Gerke

Welcome to "Redneck Genetics," where I share my thoughts on genetics, evolution, the biology of turkey hunting and other important life-issues.

I'm a German-Catholic born and raised


... Full Bio

A cyber-war has broken out between creationists and evolutionary biologists.  PZ Myers is calling upon those who are critical of creationism/intelligent design to crash an online poll about a zoo partnership.  In the few hours after his first call to arms, the YES votes (those critical of creationism) mushroomed from around 200 (20% of the vote) to 18,000 (95% of the vote).  Go vote in the poll to take part in this Stephen Colbert-esque demonstration of grass roots power.

Comments

Becky Jungbauer's picture
Thanks for the posting - I wouldn't have known about this. Isn't it amazing what the Internet can do? I've attended talks by PZ Myers before, and he's fascinating, as well as a great lightening rod for people on all sides of the issue.

This explosion of yes votes - I wonder how the zoo and the museum will interpret it. When I just checked (10:27 Eastern time), the yes votes tallied 167,525 (99.1%) and the no votes totaled 908 (0.54%). Obviously the yes votes are overwhelming. But I wonder if the museum will just blame it on those crazy godless scientists who refuse to believe Jesus rode to Sunday school on a dinosaur, and say that Myers' call was little more than stuffing the ballot box. If that's the case, is the poll valid? Will it change the museum staffers' minds?

I'm not from northern Kentucky/southern Ohio (the poll's newspaper audience), although I've driven through it a number of times and it is lovely. Regardless, I'm not a citizen and don't represent the locals that are impacted daily by the zoo and museum. Does that mean I shouldn't vote?

I don't have answers to any of these questions; I just wonder if the polls like this are merely to confirm someone's viewpoint, or if the votes come in against that viewpoint, the votes are dismissed as somehow not valid. (For a great example of this, check out the Franken/Coleman fight up in Minnesota, where I grew up. Talk about a zoo!)

jgerke's picture
Good questions.   I think the goal was to invalidate the poll.  I have a feeling that the huge margin of yes votes is at some level due to folks writing scripts to get around the cookie tracking and vote repeatedly.  Why invalidate the poll?  Because polls like this are completely unscientific (much like creationism), yet Ken Ham was using its results (before the crash) as support for his position.  It's just to prove a point that he can't use polls like this as a credible source.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.