It has come to my attention in a more recent comment thread on one of my articles that the quantum theory I advanced here has been experimentally verified. I have revisited this article and I find that the original PDF attachment has been deleted. For completeness I present some links. These links were originally for the comment thread Transsexual Smokescreen: Ignoring Science In “The Man Who Would Be Queen” The timing of this can be confirmed by sifting through that comment thread and finding these links. (Then there is also Sophia Sidelbergs reference to "HSTS Ladyboys" and Hilbert space which backs up my claims on the timing of all this.) First I have INAH⊗BSTc Entanglement of the physical-neuropsychological causes of terminal androphilia and transsexualism. Then my reply to a reply about this. My reply in which I suggest the exact type of experiment.... Which was performed and published months after I first wrote this.

Suppose a similar study was done on a wide variety of transsexuals, all volunteers, all post-op. By the same technique used by Savic it would measure weather or not they were reacting to male pheromones in the same way as heterosexual females and homosexual men. This would be made more powerful if they were people who would unquestionably be considered Autogynephiles under Blanchards theory (people who because of their age at transition or an attempt to live as a heterosexual male would be written off as "pseudoandrophiles" :roll:). IF the finding was that they react to male hormones in the way that heterosexual females and homosexual males do that would weaken Blanchards theory. Undoubtedly some of the subjects would test out as being genuinely androphilic (Consider the website http://www.marriedgay.org/ In particular [2], [3]) as sometimes homosexual men do marry for reasons that do not involve sex. They latter come out as gay/bissexual and not transsexual. (Are they "lying" about being gay? I doubt it.) I also predict that many subjects would test out as reacting to the male pheromones just as heterosexual men would. This would separate the two groups by their objectively determined reaction to male pheromones and not their self reported sexual orientation... or an objective judgment on the part of a psychologist (i.e. using his own genital response as a meter of some kind ;-) ). Are you still with me? Then the two groups could be tested by having their brains scanned while they view or otherwise consume erotic materials of their own choosing from anywhere on the Internet, as well as a restricted but varied selection of materials from the Internet which cater to men who fantize about being women. Then instead of measuring their outward arousal the technique used in [1] would measure their brain activity and come as close as current technology can get us to knowing what they are thinking. If Blanchard is correct those who's pheromone response was consistent with heterosexual males would be aroused by erotic materials that are subjectively sure to arouse an autogynephile. If his theory is totally wrong then the results will show a totally random scatter (ie basically a 50/50 chance of a HSTS having an autogynephic fantasy as a presumed AGP where as used here it refer's to their hypothalamic response). If neither of these things happen... that is to say IF those who's brains show a response consistent with heterosexual men react to the autogynephilic erotic materials it will prove that inspire of self identifying as preferring men, that on a deep biological/neurological level they in fact are attracted to women. If a large study such as the one I describe above were done it would go a long way to clarifying the issues. If it were done in this way what sexual orientation would not be surmised by attractive ness or taken on faith....a major flaw in all the studies done so far. If it were done this way the meaning of a persons sexual response would not be guessed based on appearance, general interest, etc... The brains of the subjects would react one way or the other most of the time their will be a certain but small amount of uncertainty in the measurement but overall the matter would be settled. A study like the one I describe above could determine once and or all if non-homosexual transsexuals are automatically autogynephilic. Which is the major claim of BBL theory. If a large study such as the one I describe above were done it would go a long way to clarifying the issues. If it were done in this way what sexual orientation would not be surmised by attractive ness or taken on faith....a major flaw in all the studies done so far. If it were done this way the meaning of a persons sexual response would not be guessed based on appearance, general interest, etc... The brains of the subjects would react one way or the other most of the time their will be a certain but small amount of uncertainty in the measurement but overall the matter would be settled. A study like the one I describe above could determine once and or all if non-homosexual transsexuals are automatically autogynephilic. Which is the major claim of BBL theory.

The experimental paper is Male-to-Female Transsexuals Show Sex-Atypical Hypothalamus Activation When Smelling Odorous Steroids The results are exactly as I predicted they would be based on my application of quantum physics to the human mind. Pretty good for a "HSTS lady boy" who's article was rejected by the journal probably under pressure from certain "transgendered academics" :Plication of quantum physics to the human mind. Pretty good for a "HSTS lady boy" who's article was rejected by the journal of mathematical psychology... probably under pressure from certain "transgendered academics" :P At this juncture I don't give a damm if it is ever officially or formally recognized. We transsexuals are hardly ever served well by the traditional, main stream ways of doing things. Why would it be any different for a TS scientist? It has been maligned on this blog site by others that the way science 1.0 is done if you don't have a PhD. Then it's like your science never happened or dosen't count. Dont tase me bro