Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By Tommaso Dorigo | August 30th 2009 08:41 PM | 6 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More A Quantum Diaries Survivor articles

All

About Tommaso Dorigo

I am an experimental particle physicist working with the CMS experiment at CERN and the CDF experiment at Fermilab. In my spare time I play chess, abuse the piano, and aim my dobson telescope at... Full Bio

My most visible contribution to particle physics after my death might well one sad day turn out to be the sketching of W and Z boson identification diagrams I made in 1999 for a talk I was to attend at Moriond QCD. I must have been on a bright day when I set out to make those graphs, because everywhere I turn I see somebody using them -without paying any recognition to me of course. I noticed the trend two years ago, and I get reminded of it periodically.

Recognition is not an issue, of course. I totally subscribe to the internet rule "grab what you like, use it as you please". References to sources are totally unnecessary, and actually a nuisance. So what am I complaining about, really? Hmm, nothing. Actually I like to see those old figures being displayed over and over at international conferences around the world.  This time was in a talk by Pierre Petroff, who is presently in the process of finishing his presentation at "Physics in Collisions", the conference I am attending in Kobe, Japan. He used the plots extensively, in two separate slides. He even added some scribblings on top of my admittedly perfect graphics.

Below are the figures. They show a transverse view of an idealized detector (loosely inspired by CDF), which is composed of an inner tracker, a calorimeter, and outer muon detection elements.




In the first figure above the W boson decay is taken to involve an electron and a neutrino, and it results in a large energy deposit in the calorimeter (in red) correlated with a stiff track, plus some detected energy in the hadronic calorimeter from initial state radiation (the so-called "W recoil"), and a global unbalance in the energy due to the escaping neutrino. Also notice a few additional tracks coming out of the collision point: they represent underlying event activity and multiple interactions, that produce some small energy flow uncorrelated with the boson production.



In the second figure a  Z boson instead decays to a muon pair. Here you see two stiff tracks, correlated with hits in the outer muon detection elements. The hadronic recoil is still there, but this time there is no imbalance in the transverse energy measured in the calorimeter, since no neutrinos are produced.

I hope you will concur that these plots are rather good. They show everything that is relevant, and nothing more. If somebody should hang them on my tombstone after I pass away, I would be pleased.

Comments

Hank's picture
We could put it on a t-shirt for you with the phrase "Like this plot?   I accept thanks in beer"

and add "Endorsed since 1999 by ..." with a list of all the presenters who have used it.

My photos (on the Web) regularly get ripped off. You can fight it with digital watermarking (using special programs), or a "visual watermark": use Photoshop to layer a graphic like "©2009 Tommaso Dorigo" (opacity = 20%). It's practically impossible to edit out; they would have to reproduce your original diagram. You also need to put on your slides (all of them, including text): "©2009 Tommaso Dorigo, All Rights Reserved". I understand some journals take ownership of published papers (ripoff!!), which leads to the unusual situation that the original author could get sued by the publisher (if author puts the paper on his website).

There are 2 sorts of copyright infringement: accidental & willful. The former is where the offender didn't know (it might have floated around amongs several parties). "receiving stolen property". The latter is where the offender did it intentionally, & by not giving credit to original author/artist -- he is an thief. Everybody hates thieves.

My experience in unacknowledgement of intellectual property:
During my PhD research (where I made a breakthrough concept, when the field was hopelessly stuck), my idea was stolen by a collaborator. He never acknowledged it was my idea. Naturally, his arrogance led to a mistake in that same paper (which I found, & the entire algorithm was invalidated), which was reported to the journal. They had to acknowledge me for finding the error, which was an embarassment. To this day, that fouled-up algorithm is used by texts & courses in major universities (I can point to the Caltech course URL). That same breakthrough idea of mine was used to solve the (n+1) order problem, which these same clowns spent an ENTIRE SUMMER (Swiss Federal Inst) fruitlessly trying to solve. They took my idea, FRAMED IT in their method (difficult, less intuitive than mine), & used the adjective "evidently" in their derivation!! TOTAL HOGWASH. My geometrical method (obvious to a high school student) leads to a derivation of constraint equations in 15 secs, while these clowns (including my PhD advisor) frustrated themselves an entire summer in Europe. This was the beginning of a campaign against me (newcomer to the field), which led to journal submissions being blocked. They even sabotaged my employment opportunities after graduation (IBM TJ Watson Research Lab).

If I were you, I would find out if this guy ripped you off intentionally. If so, you need to put a stop to this (& other ripoffs), otherwise the problem will get worse. Look at the El Naschie scandal, that's just crazy stupid. (which leads to Bee's presentation at Google "Why Academia Sucks"). That's the problem with Academia, this stuff goes on ALL THE TIME without any time of Enforcment (as part of the Rules/Enforcement model). Researchers (preferably part of a team), need an enforcer to go out & stop the "bad guys". Otherwise, you have chaos. That's how professional Sports keep things "in order". Baseball & Hockey are famous for retaliatory strikes, to "balance things out".

Hi Tommaso,

I am not sure if you will like this but I have been using something similar to explain (to myself) particles' decay and production inside the detector, where I was trying to visualise what exactly goes on there! I have never did it graphically for a presentation, though. Yet you stay the first to use them since you did it on 1999!

dorigo's picture
Hello all,

I think only Hank above captured the essence. I do not object to a figure I crafted being used without mentioning the source. Not at all! I am convinced that the internet has to stay free, and that the contents should be copyright free. Of course, there is a lot of people who want to make money on the web. I think they should stick with getting paid by the hits they get, period. If we move away from that model, everybody is going to lose (save very few), and the contents we will have access to will deteriorate quickly.

Different, of course, is the case of true scientific plagiarism. Here, the situation is harder to handle -but we are out of the internet then.

Hope that clarifies things. Please use my pictures, text, etcetera. It is given for free (well, Hank pays me, but that is a detail :)

Cheers,
T.

Now a days internet getting so desirable to one of all the users.It provide all scientific thing which you require in less time with full information along with contents........We capture the accencial information from internet.

Thanks & Regards
Nolan Jones

Fred Pauser's picture
Tommaso wrote:

I am convinced that the internet has to stay free, and that the contents should be copyright free. Of course, there is a lot of people who want to make money on the web. I think they should stick with getting paid by the hits they get, period. If we move away from that model, everybody is going to lose (save very few), and the contents we will have access to will deteriorate quickly.

This is so right on!!! Commercial greed has pretty much ruined most TV and radio. Already many internet sites are becoming loaded with flashing or otherwise intrusive advertisements. Increasingly sites are requiring payment for access to information.

The internet has been a tremendous free educational resource for the masses. For the good of us all, it must be maintained as such, even if that takes government intervention!

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.