Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By Tommaso Dorigo | October 5th 2009 01:58 PM | 2 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More A Quantum Diaries Survivor articles

All

About Tommaso Dorigo

I am an experimental particle physicist working with the CMS experiment at CERN and the CDF experiment at Fermilab. In my spare time I play chess, abuse the piano, and aim my dobson telescope at... Full Bio

"An illustration of the confusion about the tau is provided by two editions of a popular book on particle physics by Nigel calder entitled The Key to the Universe. In the first edition Calder wrote:

Martin Perl and his colleagues detected peculiar events occurring in SPEAR. From the scene of collision an electron and a heavy electron (the well-known muon) carrying opposite electric charges were ejected at the same moment without any other detectable particles coming out. No conventional process, involving conventional particles, could account for such events.
The particle called U was grotesquely weighty for an electron. Theorists had been asking one another for many years why the muon, a heavy electron of 105 mass-energy units, was two hundred times heavier than the ordinary electron (0.5 units). They had no answer even to that. And the U particle was estimated to be 1800 mass-energy units, twice as heavy as the hydrogen atom!
Doubts also overtook Stanford's heavy lepton, the U particle. There were suggestions, notably from the DORIS experiments in Hamburg, that it was an illusion - perhaps a misinterpretation of the decay of the charmed particles. At the time of writing these doubts have not been resolved and they illustrate again the difficulties and tensions of high-energy physics. A fair summary of the situation may be that there is no very compelling evidence so far for nature deploying more than four types of quarks and four members of the electron family.


But in the second edition Calder wrote:
The particle called U was grotesquely weighty for an electron.
Theorists had been asking one another for many years why the muon, a
heavy electron of 105 mass-energy units, was two hundred times heavier
than the ordinary electron (0.5 units). They had no answer even to
that. And the U particle was estimated to be 1800 mass-energy units,
twice as heavy as the hydrogen atom! Experiments with DORIS in Hamburg confirmed the discovery."

(Martin Perl, "The Discovery of the Tau Lepton", in L. Hoddeson et al., The Rise of the Standard Model, Cambridge University Press 1997.)

Comments

Lillian Hoddeson & Gordon Baym were husband/wife physicists (Columbia PhDs?), my mom was babysitter for their son Michael (math whiz, now postdoc @MIT). In that book, M. Gell-Mann is mentioned, I went to high school with David Pines (best friend of MGM, he was best-man at MGM's wedding) son & daughter Jon & Cathy. An upperclassman was Ira Handler, son of Dr. Phillip Handler (see anecdote about NSF in "Surely you must be joking..") I never knew this until recently, after reading the popular books on MGM & Feynman. John Bardeen Jr & his wife Marge (of Fermilab) are also high school alumni. I just found out string-theorist Shamit Kachru is alumni, Class of '87..I'm Class of '75 (aka "the Class that Didn't Give a Sh*t"). That's right, I'm from the same lineage as Lubos Motl: "Loose Lips Sinks Ships". ("the consequences be damned", say it!). Recently, I just got Kea all mad at me. Just today, I got Tommaso all annoyed at me. I'm on a hot streak.

dorigo's picture
Hi Bob, I am not annoyed, just amused by the fact that you wouldn't understand how a scientist can truly not be interested in using his or her time in making more money than he or she needs.

Cheers,
T.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.