Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By Bente Lilja Bye | January 2nd 2009 01:54 PM | 2 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More PlanetBye articles

All

About Bente Lilja Bye

Earth science expert and astrophysicist writes about Earth observation, geodesy, climate change, geohazards, water cycle and other science related topics.

I've worked as Research Director... Full Bio

Keeping track of time is hard. Not only in terms of remembering meetings and be on time at the train station. Actually measuring time is a scientific art. Most of us find it logical to use the Earth rotation as a reference and define time scale and units from that.

If only the Earth would have been more cooperative!

It isn't rotating with a constant speed for starters and it adds a little wobbling on top of that, messing things up. With the user requirements of today's technology such as GPS satellites and internet, that is just not good enough to define UTC and we use the more consistent atomic time (TAI ) scale in parallell and adjust with leap seconds when needed. International Earth Rotation and Reference System Service (IERS) of the International Association for Geodesy is the international body that decides when and how much we need to adjust. You can find out more about the details here.

And I hope you remembered to synchronize your watches and added 1 leap second this New Years eve.






In the future I suspect we need to turn to the even more stable pulsars in order to meet the users need for precision and accuracy when keeping track of time.

Comments

Becky Jungbauer's picture
I have a passing familiarity with measuring time shift via stable pulsars, but am by no means an expert. If this question is dumb, please ignore. I assume improving technology would improve our precision and accuracy, so wouldn't that therefore change the way we measure time? And wouldn't that have implications for previous time measurements, making them less precise/accurate?

Stellare's picture
On this planet atomic time has proven to be the most consistent. Maser are the technology that serves as atomic clocks.

It is the invention of masers that allowed us to improve time measurement, so in that sense you are right. But it is one of the most challenging technologies to develop and maintain. Real fine art science. Just like with vacuum, we cannot compete with space here on Earth when producing masers. The pulsars, I believe, will beat us humans no matter how hard we try to make the ultimate precise and accurate clock. :-)

Does it have implications for previous time measurements, you ask. No other that I can think of than that the previous results relying on time is less accurate than the current. We continously strive to get a better understanding trough improved temporal and spatial resolutions.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.