The next time you have to make a difficult moral decision, you might think twice about mulling it over in the bath or shower. New research in Psychological Science has found that the physical notion of cleanliness significantly reduces the severity of moral judgments showing that intuition, rather than deliberate reasoning, can influence our perception of what is right and wrong.
Lead researcher, Simone Schnall, University of Plymouth, explains the relevance of the findings to everyday life; “When we exercise moral judgment, we believe we are making a conscious, rational decision, but this research shows that we are subconsciously influenced by how clean or ‘pure’ we feel.
“Take for example the situation of a jury member or voting in an election - if the jury member had washes their hands prior to delivering their verdict, they may judge the crime less harshly.”
Similarly, someone may find it easier to overlook a political misdemeanor had they performed an action that made them feel ‘clean’ prior to casting their vote.”
The research was conducted through two experiments with university students. In the first, they were asked to complete a scrambled sentence task involving 40 sets of four words each. By underlining any three words, a sentence could be formed. For the neutral condition, the task contained 40 sets of neutral words, but for the cleanliness condition, half of the sets contained words such as ‘pure, washed, clean, immaculate, and pristine’. The participants were then asked to rate a series of moral dilemmas including keeping money found inside a wallet, putting false information on a resume and killing a terminally ill plane crash survivor in order to avoid starvation.
The second experiment saw the students watch a ‘disgusting’ film clip before rating the same moral dilemmas. However, half the group were asked to first wash their hands.
The findings from both experiments demonstrated that those who were subject to the cognitive feeling of cleanliness exercised less severe moral judgment than their counterparts.
Comments

Ashley Cox | 11/25/08 | 16:41 PM
- Reply to This »
- Link
Anonymous (not verified) | 11/26/08 | 13:20 PM
While I agree that the title does seem slanted, it's not what stood out for me in this article or study. It has little to do with "good" or "poor" choices and more to do with our apparently innate, genetically programmed need to perceive others as being "like" ourselves. It guarantees survival. This ability enables us to form necessary clans and out of this group we choose mates.
We've elected Obama as our next president because we've moved from segregated, isolated groups to a blended society where the majority are now able to identify with him. Is it a more moral choice or better judgment? It is what it is. Adaptation and survival.
We've elected Obama as our next president because we've moved from segregated, isolated groups to a blended society where the majority are now able to identify with him. Is it a more moral choice or better judgment? It is what it is. Adaptation and survival.
Nicole McNeil | 11/30/08 | 07:18 AM
“Take for example the situation of a jury member or voting in an election - if the jury member had washed their hands prior to delivering their verdict, they may judge the crime less harshly.”
I thought it was the judge who was supposed to pronounce on the degree of badness of the crime, and the jury were there to decide "did they or didn't they do it?" What if it is a crime that deserves harsh judgment, say gang rape? In Britain we're sick of judges that give the offender a "pat on the head" - maybe the judge should walk through a manure heap before passing sentence?
Similarly, someone may find it easier to overlook a political misdemeanor had they performed an action that made them feel ‘clean’ prior to casting their vote.”
No wonder that certain continental Europeans (I'm thinking of men) whose politics is traditionally more corrupt than our British version are into wearing more perfume!
And as for "washing the hands" – what about Pontius Pilate?
Robert H Olley | 11/30/08 | 08:21 AM
Steve Davis | 11/30/08 | 16:29 PM
Nicole McNeil | 12/01/08 | 16:43 PM
It's 'The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State" by Engels. He based the book on the extensive coverage of the development of human societies done by the US anthrpologist Lewis H Morgan, who was able to find remarkable parallels between the social structures and practices of the Iroquois Native Americans and the early tribes and clans of Europe. I was alerted to Engels' value in this field by an essay by Stephen J Gould on the importance of cooperative labour in human evolution, in which he credited Engels for the initial idea.
Another worthwhile book on the matter is "The Social Contract " by Robert Ardrey, which is available online.
Happy reading!
Another worthwhile book on the matter is "The Social Contract " by Robert Ardrey, which is available online.
Happy reading!
Steve Davis | 12/01/08 | 21:14 PM
So, is cleanliness next to...forgiveness? I suppose that could be equated with godliness. Regardless, this means that traveling through Europe predisposes hostel-dwelling youth to severe moral judgment of their fellow travelers. Although maybe " sink showering" and washing your underwear in the sink is a good enough correlation to what we hygienically-obsessed Americans consider pure and clean. And what does this mean for French men, and Bedouins, and cab drivers? Should they not be considered for jury duty since they stereotypically shower less frequently? Maybe that's how I can get out of civil service...
Becky Jungbauer | 12/02/08 | 21:27 PM
Nicole McNeil | 12/06/08 | 07:57 AM
Steve Davis | 12/07/08 | 05:26 AM













