Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By News Staff | March 9th 2009 01:00 AM | 13 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
There's no question that employees at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory have watched with some concern as the LHC got all the press about being the future of physics despite the fact it hadn't actually produced anything.    They have also quietly continued setting world records and are once again reminding people that Fermilab's Tevatron, currently the world's most powerful operating particle accelerator, is actually ahead, even in the race to find the as-yet undefined "Higgs particle."

Now scientists of the CDF and DZero collaborations have observed particle collisions that produce single top quarks. The discovery of the single top confirms important parameters of particle physics, including the total number of quarks, and has significance for the ongoing search for the Higgs particle.

Previously, top quarks had only been observed when produced by the strong nuclear force. That interaction leads to the production of pairs of top quarks. The production of single top quarks, which involves the weak nuclear force and is harder to identify experimentally, has now been observed, almost 14 years to the day of the top quark discovery in 1995.

Fermi CDF single top quark candidate event
This collision event display, created by the CDF collaboration, shows a single top quark candidate event. The red arrow indicates the direction of a neutrino and the purple line the direction of an electron escaping from the decay of the top quark.  Credit: CDF collaboration, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory

Searching for single-top production makes finding a needle in a haystack look easy. Only one in every 20 billion proton-antiproton collisions produces a single top quark. Even worse, the signal of these rare occurrences is easily mimicked by other "background" processes that occur at much higher rates.

"Observation of the single top quark production is an important milestone for the Tevatron program," said Dr. Dennis Kovar, Associate Director of the Office of Science for High Energy Physics at the U.S. Department of Energy. "Furthermore, the highly sensitive and successful analysis is an important step in the search for the Higgs."

Discovering the single top quark production presents challenges similar to the Higgs boson search in the need to extract an extremely small signal from a very large background. Advanced analysis techniques pioneered for the single top discovery are now in use for the Higgs boson search. In addition, the single top and the Higgs signals have backgrounds in common, and the single top is itself a background for the Higgs particle.

To make the single-top discovery, physicists of the CDF and DZero collaborations spent years combing independently through the results of proton-antiproton collisions recorded by their experiments, respectively. Each team identified several thousand collision events that looked the way experimenters expect single top events to appear. Sophisticated statistical analysis and detailed background modeling showed that a few hundred collision events produced the real thing. On March 4, the two teams submitted their independent results to Physical Review Letters.

Fermi DZero Single Top Quark Candidate Event
This proton-antiproton collision, recorded by the DZero collaboration, is among the single top quark candidate events. The top quark decayed and produced a bottom quark jet, a muon and a neutrino.  Credit: DZero collaboration, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory


The two collaborations earlier had reported preliminary results on the search for the single top. Since then, experimenters have more than doubled the amount of data analyzed and sharpened selection and analysis techniques, making the discovery possible. For each experiment, the probability that background events have faked the signal is now only one in nearly four million, allowing both collaborations to claim a bona fide discovery that paves the way to more discoveries.

"I am thrilled that CDF and DZero achieved this goal," said Fermilab Director Pier Oddone. "The two collaborations have been searching for this rare process for the last fifteen years, starting before the discovery of the top quark in 1995. Investigating these subatomic processes in more detail may open a window onto physics phenomena beyond the Standard Model."

References:

D0 Collaboration, V.M. Abazov, et al, 'Observation of Single Top Quark Production', arXiv:0903.0850v1 [hep-ex]

CDF collaboration,T. Aaltonen, et al, 'First Observation of Electroweak Single Top Quark Production', arXiv:0903.0885v1 [hep-ex]

Comments

This seems important, but I don't understand it.

and therein lies the problem of scientists. scientists need a PR team, they need people who are likeable and out there talking about these things in layman terms so that people understand why it is important and why we should care about smashing atoms together.

although past a certain point, all laymen terms sound something like "and then we smash these tiny things together to get even tinier bits out"

There is of course the possibility that this isn't important or even interesting at all ! The way I understand it, this was just a confirmation of something they expected all along. Though I suppose it is comforting that the standard model is once again confirmed, I do not find this particularly exciting.
I read somewhere that "the age of physics is over". I fear this may be true. It's results are either more of the same (yet another particle) or beyond all comprehension (for regular human beings) like string theories and super symmetry etc.

Although not specific to this article, watch or read "The Elegant Universe" by Brian Green will help you get excited and understand the importance of these discoveries. Its another step towards uncovering the truth about reality and existance.

To the person above that fears the age of physics is over: that statement could not be further from the truth. Our understanding of physics is only partly limited by the energies we can muster to reveal more of it. There is still so much theory that is yet to be confirmed by what we can discover in physics. The most exciting part of all this is that the theories we have today is so fantastic and far-fetched that if they are proven to be true, then we've only hit the tip of the iceberg of what we know about our own universe.

Dumb question from the peanut gallery: In the D0 figure, are the muon and neutrino labels swapped? Even more fascinating than finding what looks like t->b bar mu nu would be the curved neutrino track. But I've been out of the particles game for going on 10 years, maybe I've forgotten something?

The labels are correct on the D0 figure. The curved track that seems to point to missing energy is merely a coincidence. The amount of curvature of that track suggests that it was a charged particle of much lower energy than the observed missing energy. The muon has a straight track, meaning it was a fairly high momentum muon.

I'm sorry but the D0 picture apart from the fact that neutrino get detected and curved in drift chamber like the upper comment said. It looks like a t-tbar event to me.

one t -> W+bjet and W-> mu + nu (neglecting charge conjugate)
another t -> W + bjet and W->2 jets

Did I miss something?

Dunno if you missed something or not. Without the 4-vectors you can't rebuild the rest masses....

It scares me that such devices compete in a rat race to break down the box of pandora we call universe.
Is there realy a need for this knowledge in a practical use?

We're beyond fusion proces, and we cannt even handle that.

For those who are a little lost.

Quarks are sub-atomic particles. The refer to the "spin" of a nuclide. For example

Protons have 2 "up" quarks (U) and 1 down quark (D)

Each quark has a charge. U = +2/3 D= -1/3

Therefore, Protons (Z) have a positive charge. [ Z = U(2) + D = +1 ] (+2/3 +2/3 -1/3 = +1)

Neutrons (N) have the same properties.

N= U + D(2) = 0 (-1/3 - 1/3 +2/3 = 0)

This explains nuclear charges and why protons and neutrons attract (considering that ones charged and ones not, its their quarks that attract!)

There are six quarks total (up, down, top, bottom, charm, and strange), up and down being the only truely known quarks.

= )

"the age of physics is over" - LOL
the guy who said that probably also thought the US patient office should close because everything that could be invented has already been invented.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.