Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By News Staff | March 9th 2009 12:00 AM | 8 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
Researchers say they have found the first unambiguous evidence that an animal other than humans can make spontaneous plans for future events. The report in Current Biology highlights a decade of observations of a male chimpanzee calmly collecting stones and fashioning concrete discs that he would later use to hurl at zoo visitors.

While researchers have observed many ape behaviors that could involve planning both in the wild and in captivity, it generally hasn't been possible to judge whether they were really meeting a current or future need, he added. For instance, when a chimp breaks a twig for termite fishing or collects a stone for nut cracking, it can always be argued that they are motivated by immediate rather than future circumstances.

"These observations convincingly show that our fellow apes do consider the future in a very complex way," said Mathias Osvath of Lund University. "It implies that they have a highly developed consciousness, including life-like mental simulations of potential events. They most probably have an 'inner world' like we have when reviewing past episodes of our lives or thinking of days to come. When wild chimps collect stones or go out to war, they probably plan this in advance. I would guess that they plan much of their everyday behavior." 

Fellow apes?   Osvath's zoology is a little suspect so let's hope his neuroscience is a little more comprehensive - though maybe when he writes for apes he refers to them as fellow humans.   

What makes the newly described case so special, Osvath said, is that the chimp's planning behavior is not based on a "current drive state." In contrast to the chimp's extreme agitation when throwing the stones, he was always calm when collecting or manufacturing his ammunition. 

Osvath said he thinks wild chimps in general, as well as other animals, probably have the planning ability demonstrated by the individual described in the study. Indeed, experiments conducted recently with other captive chimpanzees have shown they are capable of making such plans. (Some have argued, however, that those findings could be the result of experimental artifacts.) 

"I think that wild chimpanzees might be even better at planning as they probably rely on it for their daily survival," Osvath said. "The environment in a zoo is far less complex than in a forest. Zoo chimps never have to encounter the dangers in the forest or live through periods of scarce food. Planning would prove its value in 'real life' much more than in a zoo."

Comments

They are our fellow apes, though; so I'm not sure what the objection is to the use of the phrase.

Hank's picture
All primates are not apes.   Part of the confusion in evolution is having people mix and match terms that are not correct.   Descent with modification from a common ancestor is what people, especially scientists being quoted, should get across.  Anything else is muddying the issue.   Obviously it's fine here and he may have been trying for glib but we get read by people who are not scientists too, so there's no point in giving them ammo.

True, but in context he's talking about chimpanzees, which are apes, and our closest living relatives. Hence referring to them (chimps) as "our fellow apes" makes sense.

Hank's picture
Sure, I may just be hyper-sensitive after doing this for a few years and seeing even the most innocuous of sentences get twisted by ideology, culture and politics into something completely different than what scientists mean.

True dat. It's infuriating how frequently quotes are decontextualized by certain factions with socio-political agendas.

Exactly what I was thinking. In fact, I even did a quick search to see if maybe there'd been some big shake up in phylogeny/taxonomy that I hadn't heard about.

Gerhard Adam's picture
Since animals are capable of dreaming, it would have been shocking to not have the ability to plan as indicated in the article.  The ability to dream means that they are capable of processing their experiences in a manner that extends beyond real time only.  In other words, they have a sense of past and future, as well as the imaginary.  As a result, it doesn't seem much of a stretch to suggest that animals are capable of extrapolating a cause and effect relationship (based on their experiences)which could be construed as planning. 

What of the idea of learning from human keepers/feeders?

Maybe the chimp saw the feeders setting up feeds in the AM then coming back in the PM to provide the food. Maybe chimp then learned to set up the throwing in the AM and come back in the PM and pelt the rowdy spectators?

Would be nice to have some discussion from study author about was the chimp taught (actively or passively) by guardians.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.