Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By News Staff | November 3rd 2008 12:00 AM | 8 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
It seems like common sense, right?    We don't allow cigarettes on TV because the risk to impressionable younger people is greater than it is with adults.    Adolescents who have high levels of exposure to television programs that contain sexual content are twice as likely to be involved in a pregnancy over the following three years as their peers who watch few such shows, according to a new RAND Corporation study.

The study, published in the November edition of the journal Pediatrics, is the first to establish a link between teenagers' exposure to sexual content on TV and either pregnancies among girls or responsibility for pregnancies among boys. 

"Adolescents receive a considerable amount of information about sex through television and that programming typically does not highlight the risks and responsibilities of sex," said Anita Chandra, the study's lead author and a behavioral scientist at RAND, a nonprofit research organization. "Our findings suggest that television may play a significant role in the high rates of teenage pregnancy in the United States."

Researchers from RAND Health say that exposure to sex on television may influence teen pregnancy by creating the perception that there is little risk to engaging in sex without using contraceptives and accelerating the initiation of sexual intercourse.

"The amount of sexual content on television has doubled in recent years, and there is little representation of safer sex practices in those portrayals," Chandra said. "While some progress has been made, teenagers who watch television are still going to find little information about the consequences of unprotected sexual practices among the many portrayals promoting sex."

She said that the findings hold implications for broadcasters, parents and health care providers.

Broadcasters should be encouraged to include more realistic depictions of sex in scripts and to portray consequences such as pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. Parents should consider limiting their children's access to programming with sexual content and spending more time watching programs with their children so they can explain the consequences of sex. Pediatricians should ask adolescents about their media use and discuss with them both contraception and the consequences that may accompany sexual activity.

The new findings are from a RAND research project that previously linked viewing of TV programs with sexual content with earlier initiation of sexual intercourse and other sexual activities. 

The RAND study is based on a national survey of about 2,000 adolescents aged 12 to 17 who were recruited in 2001 and asked about their television viewing habits and sexual behavior. The participants were surveyed again in 2001 and in 2004. The latest analysis is based upon results from about 700 participants who had engaged in sexual intercourse by the third survey and reported their pregnancy history. 

Information about television viewing habits was combined with the results of a separate analysis of television programs to determine the frequency and type of sexual content the adolescents were exposed to during their TV viewing. 

Researchers focused on 23 programs popular among teenagers that were widely available on broadcast and cable television, and contained high levels of sexual content (both depictions of sex as well as dialogue or discussion about sex). The shows included dramas, comedies, reality programs and animated shows. 

RAND researchers found several other factors, in addition to TV viewing, that influenced whether adolescents were likely to experience a pregnancy. Adolescents living in a two-parent household had a lower probability of pregnancy, while girls, African-Americans and those with more problem behaviors such as discipline problems were more likely to experience a pregnancy. Youths who intended to have children early also were more likely to experience a pregnancy.

Chandra said future research topics should include whether inconsistent contraceptive use may help to explain the relationship between exposure to sex on television and pregnancy. 

"Television is just one part of a teenager's media diet that helps to influence their behavior," Chandra said. "We should also look at the roles that magazines, the Internet, and music play in teens' reproductive health."

Although the teenage pregnancy rate in the United States has declined sharply since 1991, the nation still has one of the highest teen pregnancy rates among industrialized nations. Nearly 1 million young women become pregnant each year, with the majority of these pregnancies unplanned. Research has shown that young mothers are more likely than others to quit school, require public assistance and to live in poverty.


Comments

while girls, African-Americans and those with more problem behaviors such as discipline problems were more likely to experience a pregnancy

Girls were more likely to experience a pregnancy? Amazing...

It seems to be a very US specific study. I doubt we have less sexual content in the Netherlands, yet our amount of teen pregnancies is considerably lower.

hitotally disagree with report its wrong reportmit

While the conclusions of the study seem to be common sense, there are a lot of details about the science behind them missing. Amazing that there is no mention of sex education in the articles. The kind of household, and whether the kid skips school are factored in, but not sex ed or availability of contraception.....

See this discussion with the author for example, most of the questions asked are answered with vague assurances or downplayed

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2008/11/02/DI200...

Or check out the analysis / rant about the authors methods here:
http://thedetergentcrate.net76.net/

Hank's picture
The study simple established a link, it didn't say TV was the only factor.   There can be many holes in even this kind of longitudinal study if the holes are what you want to believe.    Cute cartoon characters at kid eye level in stores that sell cigarettes, exposure to guns and violence or sex on TV - no one can say there is causation for sure.

But keep in mind that only 10% of smokers get lung cancer and lots of people who get lung cancer never smoked.    There is no accurate study showing causation between smoking and any disease either, it is simply the case that it is the common link, just like viewing sex on TV in this study.

It makes sense but they still have to figure out why the link exists.    If there is no link to TV and kid behavior, it should be just fine to have teens and adults smoking, yet Rob Reiner and a number of other directors have no end to studies showing that smoking on TV and in movies basically makes kids into mindless zombies shuffling toward the local 7-11 to get some - it cannot be that smoking on TV has an impact on behavior but sex does not, right?

Gerhard Adam's picture
I don't believe it's that complicated.  Most behavior and information is going to be determined by the peer group (or any group that has some degree of influence).  In the absence of such a group, the role of television or other entertainment media will tend to prevail.

All of these sources tend to validate or refute what we want to do anway.  The problem I have is the level of ignorance displayed by teen-agers in getting pregnant.  It is mindboggling that, as a society, we should have become as technologically advanced as we have and yet be so biologically ignorant that the average teen-ager can't figure out the relationship between sex and pregnancy.

(I realize I'm overstating the case, but you get the idea)

Sexual content on television may have indeed doubled in recent years so it more important than ever to show a sense of safety and responsibility to young people. CG

Yes, I agree, a common sense approach would suggest a link between teenager pregnancy and sex on tv but how is this linked established by a study. Is it the mere fact that teenagers get a lot of info on sex by watching tv. This is a given isn't it?

I mean, I've learned a few things about guns (even as a teenager) by watching action films but I harbored no thoughts then or now of doing a drive by shooting. That is because I knew the difference between what I saw on tv and what happens in real life

Surely, teenagers today know that unprotected sex for instance leads to increased risks of contracting sexual diseases (despite what they see on screen).

I am inclined to believe that strong parenting or a lack of it is a far greater influence on teenage pregnancy that sex on tv will ever be.

It's a cultural thing - but I very much agree with Mike. Good parenting can drill into children about safe sex and a healthy lifestyle, and it's no mystery that some parents simply are not up to the job. Some parents see the TV as a teaching tool, but I really don't think there is that much on the box to be worried about. However, the magazines and obsessional sexualisation of the media in general is most definitely a problem.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.