Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By News Staff | June 18th 2008 10:26 PM | 2 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
The 2007 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report was wrong, say a group of researchers, but not about whether there was global warming. Rather, the report underestimated its effects concerning ocean temperature and associated sea level increases between 1961 and 2003 - by 50 percent.

The report in the June 19 edition of Nature compared climate models with observations that show sea levels rose by 1.5 millimeters per year in the period from 1961-2003. That equates to an approximately 2 inch increase in ocean levels in a 42-year span.

Not exactly WaterWorld but not insignificant either.

The researchers say they corrected for small but systematic biases recently discovered in the global ocean observing system, and used statistical techniques that "infill" information in data-sparse regions.

They say their new results increase confidence in ocean observations and demonstrate that climate models simulate ocean temperature variability more realistically than previously thought.

"This is important for the climate modeling community because it demonstrates that the climate models used for assessing sea-level rise and ocean warming tie in closely with the observed results," Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory climate scientist Peter Gleckler said.

Climate model data were analyzed from 13 different modeling groups. All model data were obtained from the WCRP CMIP3 multi-model dataset archived at the LLNL's Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison (PCMDI)

Although observations and models confirm that recent warming is greatest in the upper ocean, there are widespread observations of warming deeper than 700 meters.

Results were compared with recent estimates of other contributions to sea-level rise including glaciers, ice caps, Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, and thermal expansion changes in the deep ocean. When these independent lines of evidence are examined collectively, the story is more consistent than found in earlier studies

The oceans store more than 90 percent of the heat in the Earth's climate system and act as a temporary buffer against the effects of climate change. The ocean warming and thermal expansion rates are 50 percent larger than previous estimates for the upper 700 meters of oceans, and greater than that for the upper 300 meters.

"This is just the tip of the iceberg, so to speak," Gleckler said. "Our ability to quantify structural uncertainties in observationally based estimates is critically important. This study represents important progress."

The team involved researchers from the Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research (CSIRO), the Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre and LLNL.

Comments

It's unbelievable how much crap one can squeeze from this political pseudo-science: climate change, weapons of mass distruction, building 7 and so on.

Small temperature change (~2-3 deg. C) in the climate system has already shown its effects to mankind. The higher occurences of typhoons, super storms, hurricanes, and even earthquakes are indications of the fragility we have subjected mother nature to through our use and abuse of what the world has to offer us. Knowing that we have been wrong-footed in the measurements should make us more aware of how serious global warming issue is. The ocean temperature is definitely rising far more rapidly than we thought, just looking at the rate of ice caps melting at both poles. Continual melting of the polar caps will result in more increase in the sea level which will then post threats to people living both by and near the beach. How are we preparing ourselves for the inevitable? I don't think global warming is a force that can be stopped. If 10% world population are making effort to reduce their portion towards global warming, there's still 90% more who can't or won't due to economic reasons. All these scary images and thoughts about the force of nature will not only happen, it's already happening whether we like it or not. Question is, what are we doing to mitigate the effects? Farah Hani Abdul Rahim

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.