Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By News Staff | September 17th 2008 12:00 AM | 13 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
Muscle weighs more than fat and that's why it's sometimes the case where you can maintain the same weight but end up a lot less healthy. In the elderly, this effect becomes even more pronounced and the reverse is true. But the 'take home message' remains as always: diet helps but exercise is going to lead to better overall health.

A group of sedentary and overweight older people placed on a four-month exercise program not only became more fit, but burned off more fat, compared to older sedentary people who were placed on a diet but did not exercise.

The new study also showed that when older people diet without exercising, they lose more lean muscle compared to those who exercise, said senior researcher Bret H. Goodpaster. When they combined weight loss with exercise, it nearly completely prevented the loss of lean muscle mass. The results are important because older people tend to lose muscle mass as they age and too much muscle loss may interfere with activities of daily living.

The study, "Separate and combined effects of exercise training and weight loss on exercise efficiency and substrate oxidation," appears in the current issue of the Journal of Applied Physiology, published by The American Physiological Society. Francesca Amati, John J. Dube, Chris Shay and Goodpaster, all of the University of Pittsburgh, carried out the study.

Study looks at exercise efficiency

The researchers wanted to know the best way to get better (more efficient) at completing a defined exercise task. In particular, they wanted to know if greater fitness could be achieved through exercise training, weight loss (through dieting), or both. In addition, they wanted to know which fuel source the body would draw upon, carbohydrates or fats, under these different conditions.

The 64 participants were 60-75 years of age and were either overweight or obese. All of the participants were sedentary at the outset of the study. The researchers divided the participants into three groups:


  • exercise only
  • diet only
  • exercise plus diet



Those who exercised could either walk on a treadmill or ride a stationary bicycle, although most chose to walk. The dieters reduced their caloric intake to achieve a 10% weight loss by the end of the four-month study period. The final group combined both the daily exercise and the diet.

Exercise increases efficiency, burns more fat

The researchers measured how many calories the participants expended during a set work load on a stationary bicycle at the beginning and at the end of the experiment. They found that the:


  • Exercise group expended fewer calories (became more efficient) on the exercise task at the end of the study compared to the beginning.
  • Exercise group drew more on fat stores as the source of their body's fuel.
  • Diet-only group did not gain efficiency in performing the exercise task, even though they weighed less at the end of the experiment.
  • Diet-only group's weight loss resulted from a loss of both muscle and fat.
  • Exercise plus diet group was the most efficient at the exercise task at the end of the experiment. This shows an additive effect of both dieting and exercise, but most of that benefit was due to exercise.
  • Exercise plus diet group, like the exercise-only group, drew more on fat stores as an energy source.



"The take-home message is that, even among older people and during a fairly short period of time, exercise produces metabolic changes that require the expenditure of fewer calories during physical activity," Goodpaster said. Exercise also allowed older people to more preferentially burn fat, which may be healthier metabolically."


Comments

Firstly I want to congratulate you for your beautiful post. I have been searching so many pages for weight loss tips based on diet and exercises. Your article is the first one which gave diet info especially for older people. Thanks for that!

i think that the title you choose is misleading
the original title is "Separate and combined effects of exercise training and weight loss on exercise efficiency and substrate oxidation "
it one want to compare muscule lose wile dieting or exercising, than a diffrent kind of activity should be examine. strength training

in the abstract of the research, no methode of checking muscle mass was mentioned

Hank's picture
There isn't much point to just reading an abstract, I think. Read the study. If you don't want to spend the $8 (I assume you don't subscribe) you can write Goodpaster and he will probably send you a copy.

the one who should pay the 8$ is the one who write the news, not the one who read it.
this report was published in a few web site with the same title, which to my opinion (based only on reading the abstract)don't match the the subject of the research.
in any of the web sites where the report was published there is no data about how much muscle mass was wested while dieting compare with exercise.
do you have any other information to share?
did you pay the 8$?

Hank's picture
No, a subscription to JAP costs a lot more than that. $8 is just if you want to buy one article.

I think every new study that comes out will have 50 organizations writing about it, everyone from USA Today to companies that just distribute press releases. If all of the stories on this were basically the same, and you only read the abstract, what makes you think everyone else is wrong?

the purpose of my comments was not to say how smart i am and how wrong everybody is.
i just said what was on my mind when i read the report
i first run into this report in http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/09/080917095349.htm
and i didn't see any facts written to backup with the title.
so i went to read the abstract, and nothing mentioned there either.
i came up to this blog and i thought "this is what blogging is all about - a communication between readers and writers" and i post my opinion.
and i must say i expected a better answer then "pay the 8$ and find it out".

Hank's picture
No, I wrote:

There isn't much point to just reading an abstract, I think. Read the study. If you don't want to spend the $8 (I assume you don't subscribe) you can write Goodpaster and he will probably send you a copy.

because you said the accuracy was bad because the details were not in the abstract. Abstracts frequently don't have the details but most researchers will send you a copy if you are interested. They want people to be interested in their work. If you're not writing a paper on it or citing it in a study, the $8 is not a good investment.

Sciencedaily, physorg, PR Newswire and lots of others are press release companies so they publish whatever people pay them to send. They don't write any articles. Obviously sometimes we publish a well-written release too - we just don't charge universities or magazines a fee to do it.

the problem is that when you are overweight, you can not be sure that you will become an old man...
I use to say it in my diet site, and this is the plain, uncomfortable true.

People should read this blog... it's great!

Thanks

It's important to emphasize that sports activity has to go with a healthy diet. Exercising while not eating enough is much worse then dieting without exercising.

There is always something new to learn about

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.