Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By News Staff | April 10th 2009 02:00 AM | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
If words were people, then "eloquent," "love" and "symphony" would get dates most Friday nights but "vomit," "moist" and "puke" would stay home alone, wondering what went wrong. 

How are words pretty or ugly? That's the question Robert E. Wolverton Sr., a Mississippi State University classics professor, recently asked in a survey of some 75 students in his classes. The poll is part of the foreign language faculty member's "semi-frequent" examination of how students at the land-grant university view widely used terms. 

Of the 148 different "beautiful" words submitted by students this year are several listed multiple times: eloquent (six), love (four) and symphony (four). Beautiful, lavender and tranquility each received three mentions. 

Of the 138 "ugly" words, the following are mentioned multiple times: vomit (six), moist (five), puke (five), phlegm (four), slaughter (four), snot (four), ugly (four), damp (three), and mucus (three). 

Also, the name of a football team may make an ugly word for some, while food types have the sound of beauty. 

Wolverton also asked students to spend some time thinking about what makes a word either pretty or unattractive. The association between words and sounds, while being pronounced often, factor into how they are considered, Wolverton said. 

The same can be true of a word's language of origin, Wolverton noted, adding that many words viewed as pretty "often have Greek or Latin origins." In general, the short, monosyllable words seemed to be viewed as ugly, while polysyllabic words seemed to have more likability, based on years of the survey's results, he said. 

Compared to previous years, one difference in the 2009 survey results involves the selection of religious-themed words as pretty.   According to Wolverton, fewer students listed them this year.   Expressing surprise, he observed that "so many of our students come from small towns. "For many of them the church is the social center." 

Also, "mellifluous" and "lullaby," two words consistently considered pretty over the years, dropped off this year's list. "Susurrus," which describes a soft, whispering or rustling sound, made the list for the first time, however. 

Wolverton said he thinks the increasing number of iPhones and other modern communication technologies may be providing students with "greater word diversity on a regular basis." 

This year's class survey is the fourth for the veteran educator. He said he didn't have a specific goal when he created it, just an interest to see what his students were thinking. 

"I was just curious to see what would come out of it," he said.


Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.