Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By News Staff | November 24th 2008 01:00 AM | 7 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
You've heard it before.   According to the laws of physics, bees can't fly.   Yet fly they do.   And British zoologist Sir James Gray noticed something strange about dolphins in 1936.  He had observed the sea mammals swimming at a swift rate of more than 20 miles per hour, but his studies had concluded that the muscles of dolphins simply weren't strong enough to support those kinds of speeds. The conundrum came to be known as "Gray's Paradox." 

For decades the puzzle prompted much attention, speculation, and conjecture in the scientific community. But now, armed with cutting-edge flow measurement technology, researchers at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute have tackled the problem and conclusively solved Gray's Paradox. 

"Sir Gray was certainly on to something, and it took nearly 75 years for technology to bring us to the point where we could get at the heart of his paradox," said Timothy Wei, professor and acting dean of Rensselaer's School of Engineering, who led the project. "But now, for the first time, I think we can safely say the puzzle is solved. The short answer is that dolphins are simply much stronger than Gray or many other people ever imagined."


A single frame from a research video tracking the flow of water around Primo, a retired US Navy bottlenose dolphin.  Photo Credit: Rensselaer/Tim Wei


Wei is presenting his findings today at the 61st Annual Meeting of the American Physical Society (APS) Division of Fluid Dynamics in San Antonio, Texas. Collaborators on the research include Frank Fish, a biologist at West Chester University in Pennsylvania; Terrie Williams, a marine biologist at the University of California, Santa Cruz; Rensselaer undergraduate student Yae Eun Moon; and Rensselaer graduate student Erica Sherman.

After studying dolphins, Gray said in 1936 that they are not capable of producing enough thrust, or power-induced acceleration, to overcome the drag created as the mammal sped forward through the water. This drag should prevent dolphins from attaining significant speed, but simple observation proved otherwise – a paradox. In the absence of a sound explanation, Gray theorized that dolphin skin must have special drag-reducing properties.

More than 70 years later, Wei has developed a tool that conclusively measures the force a dolphin generates with its tail. 


The same frame, but with visualized information illustrating the water flow. The arrows indicate in which direction the water is moving, and the colors indicate the speed. The red and dark blue arrows signify the fastest-moving water.  Photo Credit: Source: Rensselaer/Tim Wei


Wei created this new state-of-the-art water flow diagnostic technology by modifying and combining force measurement tools developed for aerospace research with a video-based flow measurement technique known as Digital Particle Image Velocimetry, which can capture up to 1,000 video frames per second. 

Wei videotaped two bottlenose dolphins, Primo and Puka, as they swam through a section of water populated with hundreds of thousands of tiny air bubbles. He then used sophisticated computer software to track the movement of the bubbles. The color-coded results show the speed and in what direction the water is flowing around and behind the dolphin, which allowed researchers to calculate precisely how mush force the dolphin was producing.

Wei also used this technique to film dolphins as they were doing tail-stands, a trick where the dolphins "walk" on water by holding most of their bodies vertical above the water while supporting themselves with short, powerful thrusts of their tails.

The results show that dolphins produce on average about 200 pounds of force when flapping their tail – about 10 times more force than Gray originally hypothesized. 

"It turns out that the answer to Gray's Paradox had nothing to do with the dolphins' skin," Wei said. "Dolphins can certainly produce enough force to overcome drag. The scientific community has known this for a while, but this is the first time anyone has been able to actually quantitatively measure the force and say, for certain, the paradox is solved."

At peak performance, the dolphins produced between 300 and 400 pounds of force. Human Olympic swimmers, by comparison, peak at about 60 to 70 pounds of force, Wei said. He knows this for a fact because he has been working with U.S.A. Swimming over the past few years to use these same bubble-tracking DPIV and force-measuring techniques to better understand how elite swimmers interact with the water, and improve lap times.

"It was actually a natural extension to go from swimmers to dolphins," said Wei, whose research ranges from aeronautical and hydrodynamic flow of vehicles to more biological topics dealing with the flow of cells and fluid in the human body.

The dolphins Wei filmed, Primo and Puka, are retired U.S. Navy dolphins who now live at the Long Marine Laboratory at UC Santa Cruz.

Wei said the research team will likely continue to investigate the flow dynamics and force generation of other marine animals, which could yield new insight into how different species have evolved as a result of their swimming proficiency.

"Maybe sea otters," he said.


Comments

iayork's picture
I am so sick of these misleading press releases getting blindly grabbed and blabbed around.  A thirty-second check shows that Gray's Paradox has been resolved a half-dozen times already; going back at least to 2000, and probably earlier.  The press release is, of course, misleading.  It's a new way of measuring that confirmed what people already knew.  

Gerhard Adam's picture
Sorry, but what measurements are you referring to?  Everything that I've seen is full of hypothesis and guesses (with some ranges of numbers), but I don't recall ever seeing any measurements.

The text actually mentions that the method used is 'particle image velocimetry' (PIV). There is not cutting-edge measurement. It's surprising that the dolphin is much stronger that expected, this answer seems a little bit too obvious. Why didn't they come up with that solution earlier?

Gerhard Adam's picture
I think you're misunderstanding that PIV is a particular method that has been around for 20+ years, but this is DPIV and it involves a particular application that was developed.  So I suspect it's much more cutting edge than you may be giving credit for.

Danna Staaf's picture
I saw a seminar by Frank Fish recently, and he mentioned this work. So cool! One of the things that really impressed me was how they figured out to apply DPIV to a large mammal. When you use this technique on little inverts, your "particles" are neutrally buoyant microbeads. It's impractical (and I think unethical, since ethics boards care a lot more about dolphins than copepods) to fill a dolphin's enclosure with microbeads, so they just used bubbles instead. Simple and clever!

In response to: "Sorry, but what measurements are you referring to? Everything that I've seen is full of hypothesis and guesses (with some ranges of numbers), but I don't recall ever seeing any measurements."

I refer you to the article:

"The results show that dolphins produce on average about 200 pounds of force when flapping their tail – about 10 times more force than Gray originally hypothesized."

"At peak performance, the dolphins produced between 300 and 400 pounds of force. Human Olympic swimmers, by comparison, peak at about 60 to 70 pounds of force"

These sure sound like measurements to me, chief.

Can we put this myth to bed that bees should not be able to fly?

This is obviously wrong, because they do fly. The reason for this incorrect belief is the work of a French anthropologist who calculated that bees should not be able to fly. His data was flawed. He used a static measurement for the bees wings, ergo, there is nt enough aerofoil effect from such small wings. Beat the wings at 1000 times a minute they produce plenty of lift to move a bee through the air and its cargo of pollen.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.