Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By News Staff | January 29th 2008 04:00 AM | 2 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
Midwestern farming has introduced the equivalent of five Connecticut Rivers into the Mississippi River over the past 50 years and is adding more carbon dioxide annually into its waters, according to a study published in Nature by researchers at Yale and Louisiana State universities.

“It’s like the discovery of a new large river being piped out of the corn belt,” said Pete Raymond, lead author of the study and associate professor of ecosystem ecology at the Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies. “Agricultural practices have significantly changed the hydrology and chemistry of the Mississippi River.”

The researchers tracked changes in the levels of water and bicarbonate, which forms when carbon dioxide in soil water dissolves rock minerals. Bicarbonate plays an important, long-term role in absorbing atmospheric carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas. Oceans then absorb the excess carbon dioxide and become more acidic in the process. “Ocean acidification makes it more difficult for organisms to form hard shells in coral reefs,” said R. Eugene Turner, a co-author of the study and a professor at the Coastal Ecology Institute at Louisiana State University.

The Mississippi River. Credit: Jerry Ting



The researchers concluded that farming practices, such as liming, changes in tile drainage and crop type and rotation, are responsible for the majority of the increase in water and carbon dioxide in the Mississippi River, which is North America’s largest river.

Raymond said that the research team analyzed 100-year-old data on the Mississippi River, warehoused at two New Orleans water treatment plants, along with data on precipitation and water export. “A notable finding is that changes in farming practices are more important than changes in precipitation to the increase in water being discharged into the river,” he said.

The researchers used their data to demonstrate the effects of excess water on the carbon content of the river, and to argue that nutrients and pollution in the water are altering the chemistry of the Gulf of Mexico.

Besides Raymond and Turner, the other authors of the study, “,” are Neung-Hwan Oh of the Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, and Whitney Broussard of the Department of Oceanography and Coastal Sciences at Louisiana State University.

Citation: Peter A. Raymond, Neung-Hwan Oh, R. Eugene Turner & Whitney Broussard, Anthropogenically Enhanced Fluxes of Water and Carbon from the Mississippi River, Nature 451, 449 (2008). doi:10.1038/nature06505

Comments

What are the long-term effects of the increase in carbon dioxide levels in the Mississippi River? I'd be interested in your speculations as to what precisely is being affected in the Mississippi River ecosystem.

Hank's picture
I assume you are making the point that carbon dioxide increases aren't always bad, and you're right - climate models show that increased CO2 will boost potato crops, for example, and more potatoes means cheaper food for people who need it most. This corresponds to other studies saying CO2 was not bad for plants, it was downright good, before CO2 was the dirty term of the decade.

So all plants do better with more CO2, but 'all' will be the problem. Invasive, pesky plants that can choke out everything else grow better with higher temperatures and more CO2. It has to be cheaper to start looking for energy solutions that produce less CO2 than to be sending government employees into the Gulf of Mexico to clear out weeds that are killing everything else.

Unless you're the kind of person who likes big government projects, in which case cleaning the Gulf of Mexico will make the TVA look like a barn raising. :)

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.