Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By News Staff | October 23rd 2008 09:20 PM | 5 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
If a doctor believes an antibiotic or sedative is not needed and instead provides a placebo to a patient, is the physician protecting public health or subjectively disregarding the ethics of full disclosure? You decide.

Many rheumatologists and general internal medicine physicians in the US say they regularly prescribe "placebo treatments" including active drugs such as sedatives and antibiotics, but rarely admit they are doing so to their patients, according to a study on BMJ.com today.

The use of placebo treatments in clinical practice has been widely criticized because it is claimed that the practice by its very nature is deceptive and therefore violates patients' autonomy. But advocates of placebo treatments argue that they could offer effective treatment for many chronic conditions without necessarily deceiving patients. Despite the controversy, there has been little data to-date on doctors' attitudes towards and the use of placebo treatments in the US.

Dr Jon Tilburt and his colleagues from the National Institutes of Health as well as collaborators at Harvard and the University of Chicago examined the attitudes and behaviors to placebo treatments in a national sample of general internal medicine physicians and rheumatologists in the US.

The researchers sent a confidential survey to 1200 randomly selected practising general internal medicine physicians and rheumatologists (a group of doctors who commonly treat patients with debilitating chronic conditions that are notoriously difficult to manage medically).

The authors report that among the 679 physicians (57%) who responded to the survey half of them said they prescribed "placebo treatments" on a regular basis. Most physicians (62%) believed the practice to be ethically acceptable and were happy to recommend or prescribe placebo treatments.

The most commonly used placebo treatments prescribed in the past year were over the counter painkillers (41%) or vitamins (38%). Some of the physicians reported using antibiotics (13%) and sedatives (13%) as placebos, only 3% reported using sugar pills.

Interestingly, among those who prescribe placebo treatments, most doctors (68%) said they typically describe the placebo treatments to patients as "a potentially beneficial medicine or treatment not typically used for their condition", only rarely did they admit to explicitly describing them to patients as "placebos".

Although there was only a moderate response rate to the survey (57%), even if all the non-responders never gave placebos, placebo prescribing is still surprisingly common, say the authors.

The authors say that while the use of placebos has been controversial, the physicians in the study did not believe they were behaving unethically by either using placebos or not being upfront with their patients about doing so.

They point out that understanding the role of placebo treatments in contemporary medicine is complex. They conclude that prescribing harmless treatments like vitamins or over the counter painkillers to promote positive expectations without full disclosure of motivations might not raise alarm bells, but prescribing antibiotics and sedatives when there is no clear medical indication could have serious adverse consequences for both patients and public health.


Comments

Jim Myres's picture
Shame on you doctor. I am a pharmacist and I see this daily.
The very worst is the doctor that prescribes antibiotics (the Z-Pak is the current favorite) for the common cold (you can't treat viral infections with antibiotics). They are putting all of us at risk. The more people that take these drugs the less effective they become when we really need them. Plus this is killing out insurance cost.
I have a theory that this all started around 1967. I was a pharmacy student from 63 to 66 then I went into the military 66 to 70. When I came out of the military in 1970 and back to pharmacy school I noticed a change. Before I went into the military only a very few Rx's were for mind altering drugs, four years later 25% of drugs were for mind altering drugs. What happened - Valium - now doctors had something to give patients that wouldn't cure whatever was wrong with them but it sure made them forget the problem. Office contact time also was greatly reduced.
The patient is part of the problem as well as the media. The next time you watch television (after the election) count the number of drugs that are advertised on TV during a commercial cycle (every 15 minutes). The fact is -- DRUGS ARE NOT THE ANSWER -- and you heard that from a pharmacist.
People think they have to be pain free all the time - sorry life is not that easy. If you have cancer or some other devistating disease or condition I will fight to keep you pain free but ordinary pains and aches are something we should learn to deal with.
Don't expect or ever demand an Rx when you see your doctor. If you do get an Rx ask the doctor what it is for, how you should take it and when you should stop taking it.
Jim Myres, R.Ph.
The Christ Hospital Apothecary

p.s. Sorry I don't mean to lecture the reader, this is just something that I have to deal with daily.

Placebos are a great idea to keep a minority of hypochondriacs happy. I don't have an ethical issue with it at all, as long as they give out non-drugs with the lie (or absence of truth), but if they were lying when giving a actual drug, that'd be a different issue.

I don't get how this is possible in the US? Unless you are in a hospital setting. But when I get a prescription I go to the pharmacy with it and they fill it. It's a separate location. I have never heard of some secret code on the prescription pad that denotes placebo, and I'm in nursing school now. So I can't imagine this really happening. And I've not been told about doing it at the hospital at all either. This violates trust between a patient and a nurse giving the meds knowing they aren't really meds. Other than drug trials I have never heard of drugs being made as placebos that "look" like the real drug either. I guess I never realized how naive the general public is about what they are taking.

I don't like the idea of being given a placebo for two reasons.
One, a placebo is the physician's way of dismissing my medical concern. If the doctor can not figure out what's wrong, there's an obligation to be honest about that, and likewise if my physician thinks I'm imagining the problem, *I* have a right to know that and seek other care if need be.
Two, placebo use ignores the real medical problem- if I do NOT have anything wrong physically, and insist that I do, there's something wrong here. I may need a referral to a different sort of help- psychological, emotional - something's wrong, and ignoring it won't solve it.

In addition to the things Kit mentions, another problem I have with this is doctors using actual active drugs as placebos. "Sugar pills" are one thing, but antibiotics, sedatives, and painkillers? There is no way any of those things should be given to someone without their knowledge. Even vitamins, which should be pretty benign, should not be given without knowledge, as they can have interactions with other medications, vitamins, etc. someone may be taking.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.