People who score high on intelligence tests are also good at keeping time, new Swedish research shows. The team that carried out the study also suspect that accuracy in timing is important to the brain processes responsible for problem solving and reasoning.
Researchers at the medical university Karolinska Institutet and Umeå University have now demonstrated a correlation between general intelligence and the ability to tap out a simple regular rhythm. They stress that the task subjects performed had nothing to do with any musical rhythmic sense but simply measured the capacity for rhythmic accuracy. Those who scored highest on intelligence tests also had least variation in the regular rhythm they tapped out in the experiment.
“It’s interesting as the task didn’t involve any kind of problem solving,” says Fredrik Ullén at Karolinska Institutet, who led the study with Guy Madison at Umeå University. “Irregularity of timing probably arises at a more fundamental biological level owing to a kind of noise in brain activity.”
According to Fredrik Ullén, the results suggest that the rhythmic accuracy in brain activity observable when the person just maintains a steady beat is also important to the problem-solving capacity that is measured with intelligence tests.
“We know that accuracy at millisecond level in neuronal activity is critical to information processing and learning processes,” he says.
They also demonstrated a correlation between high intelligence, a good ability to keep time, and a high volume of white matter in the parts of the brain’s frontal lobes involved in problem solving, planning and managing time.
“All in all, this suggests that a factor of what we call intelligence has a biological basis in the number of nerve fibres in the prefrontal lobe and the stability of neuronal activity that this provides,” says Fredrik Ullén.
Article: ‘Intelligence and variability in a simple timing task share neural substrates in the prefrontal white matter’, Fredrik Ullén, Lea Forsman, Örjan Blom, Anke Karabanov and Guy Madison, The Journal of Neuroscience, 16 April 2008.
- HOME
- PHYSICAL SCIENCES
- EARTH SCIENCES
- LIFE SCIENCES
- MEDICINE
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
- CULTURE
- VIDEO
- CONTRIBUTORS
- CONTEST
Subscribe to the newsletter
[x]
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
What's Happening
- Music + Physics + Creativity = Genius
- Autism And Vaccines: Why People Still Believe The Hype
- Reductionism And Systems Thinking: Complementary Scientific Lenses
- Higgs Mass Limits: 130-210 GeV !!
- Why So Many Earthquakes This Decade?
- The Quote of the Week: Audio and Video Quarks!
- A Plea For More Sex And Violence On TV
- "Okay! It's a legitimate AI. You should try talking to Joan at icogno.com, which is also a part..."
- "Oh, yeah. I forgot about that part. The one where I know how to make it appealing to kids. I understand..."
- "I have to warn you though. Joan is a little possessive and doesn't like it when you try to leave..."
- "Go for it ... however it's worth considering that there's a reason why kids prefer to compete in..."
- "There's no pretence, here, and not off topic - the essence of this piece is about Sharks being..."
- New 'smart' roof reads the thermometer, saves energy in hot and cold climates
- Seaweed to tackle rising tide of obesity
- Gene is linked to lung cancer development in never-smokers
- Brewing up a gentler java: Dark-roasted coffee contains stomach-friendly ingredient
- Detecting fake wine vintages: It's an (atomic) blast
Books By Writers Here
© 2010 ION Publications LLC






