Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By News Staff | November 17th 2008 03:00 AM | 11 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
What is the latest recipe for anti-matter?  Take a gold sample the size of the head of a push pin, shoot a laser through it, and suddenly more than 100 billion particles of anti-matter appear.  The anti-matter, also known as positrons, shoots out of the target in a cone-shaped plasma "jet."

This new ability to create a large number of positrons in a small laboratory opens the door to several fresh avenues of anti-matter research, including an understanding of the physics underlying various astrophysical phenomena such as black holes and gamma ray bursts.  Anti-matter research also could reveal why more matter than anti-matter survived the Big Bang at the start of the universe.

"We've detected far more anti-matter than anyone else has ever measured in a laser experiment," said Hui Chen, a Livermore researcher who led the experiment. "We've demonstrated the creation of a significant number of positrons using a short-pulse laser." Chen and her colleagues used a short, ultra-intense laser to irradiate a millimeter-thick gold target. "Previously, we concentrated on making positrons using paper-thin targets," said Scott Wilks, who designed and modeled the experiment using computer codes. "But recent simulations showed that millimeter-thick gold would produce far more positrons. We were very excited to see so many of them."


Physicist Hui Chen sets up targets for the anti-matter experiment at the Jupiter laser facility.

In the experiment, the laser ionizes and accelerates electrons, which are driven right through the gold target. On their way, the electrons interact with the gold nuclei, which serve as a catalyst to create positrons. The electrons give off packets of pure energy, which decays into matter and anti-matter, following the predictions by Einstein's famous equation that relates matter and energy. By concentrating the energy in space and time, the laser produces positrons more rapidly and in greater density than ever before in the laboratory.

"By creating this much anti-matter, we can study in more detail whether anti-matter really is just like matter, and perhaps gain more clues as to why the universe we see has more matter than anti-matter," said Peter Beiersdorfer, a lead Livermore physicist working with Chen.

Particles of anti-matter are almost immediately annihilated by contact with normal matter, and converted to pure energy (gamma rays). There is considerable speculation as to why the observable universe is apparently almost entirely matter, whether other places are almost entirely anti-matter, and what might be possible if anti-matter could be harnessed. Normal matter and anti-matter are thought to have been in balance in the very early universe, but due to an "asymmetry" the anti-matter decayed or was annihilated, and today very little anti-matter is seen.

Over the years, physicists have theorized about anti-matter, but it wasn't confirmed to exist experimentally until 1932. High-energy cosmic rays impacting Earth's atmosphere produce minute quantities of anti-matter in the resulting jets, and physicists have learned to produce modest amounts of anti-matter using traditional particle accelerators. Anti-matter similarly may be produced in regions like the center of the Milky Way and other galaxies, where very energetic celestial events occur. The presence of the resulting anti-matter is detectable by the gamma rays produced when positrons are destroyed when they come into contact with nearby matter.

Laser production of anti-matter isn't entirely new either. Livermore researchers detected anti-matter about 10 years ago in experiments on the since-decommissioned Nova "petawatt" laser - about 100 particles. But with a better target and a more sensitive detector, this year's experiments directly detected more than 1 million particles. From that sample, the scientists infer that around 100 billion positron particles were produced in total.

Until they annihilate, positrons (anti-electrons) behave much like electrons (just with an opposite charge), and that's how Chen and her colleagues detected them. They took a normal electron detector (a spectrometer) and equipped it to detect particles with opposite polarity as well.

"We've entered a new era," Beiersdorfer said. "Now, that we've looked for it, it's almost like it hit us right on the head. We envision a center for antimatter research, using lasers as cheaper anti-matter factories."

Comments

This article is pretty disappointing.

The electrons give off packets of pure energy...

Really? You couldn't have done any better than this?

when an electron meets a photon......... -----------

I am kind-a like the other commenters, you just blew up some good gold and made pretty sparks. If you want to look at an energy conversion that produced a energy burst from dark matter check out the red sprites, there are some great web sites with cool pictures of real mtter anti-matter examples. The mysteries of the clouds. Charles E. Schirmer 

HedgehogFive's picture
Reactions like this are expected in massive stars that are burning silicon in their core a few days prior to going supernova (example abstract).

I'm more worried about Hedgehog-antiHedgehog annihilation, though.


Great Website, great article.Greetings.

So.. Angels & Daemons mith now is closer to reality, CERN invalidates the anti-mater bomb because they say cant produce that much for a bomb for very long time, now ? has the anti-matter production become more easy ? we are getting closer to the anti-matter bomb ?

Pure energy is probably not a modern scientific concept, unless impure energy is going to be defined sometime soon.

The process being described is not much different that the X-ray machine in a dentist’s office, just constructed a little differently to harvest positrons.

It could be argued that the laser interacts directly with protons that are held in the gold nucleus, not necessarily, through the orbital electrons.

Then the protons get excited by absorbing photons and turn into neutrons giving off the extra energy as positrons (electrons going backward in time) and neutrinos.

When that happens the gold turns into an unstable isotope of platinum for about 20 hours then turns back into gold by giving off beta rays (really angry electrons) and antineutrinos.

I looked back into my older handbooks to see what vintage of science we are discussing here.

The answer is that this science predates my K-2 encyclopedia of physics for really advanced toddlers. So I don’t know how old it is. Best guess is 1932. The difference is that it used to be done with cosmic rays and X-rays, and now its done with lasers.

About the antimatter bomb, CERN probably knew about this when they gave their opinion. It takes a lot of power and most of that power is lost in the process.

How much power?

Try looking up a petawatt.

Hint ( quadrillion watts )

For the curious.

That's 10 kilowatts per positron .... and .... we are financing it.

The real news story here is the improvement of the petawatt lasers to fire a longer burst of photons.

The first petawatt machines only fired for 10-15 seconds, for a total of one Joule.

Now the petawatts are reporting 10--12 seconds, for a total of one thousand Joules.

For a single photon to make a positron, the laser would have to be firing an energy level something like 2 Mev gamma rays, which is unlikely. So it probably takes thousands of photons to make a positron.

With 100 billion positrons the energy required is about 0.03 Joules. For low efficiencies a one Joule machine couldn’t do it, but a thousand joule machine could.

The thicker target is still a good story, especially with the longer burst from the laser.

For those who worry about danger, the laser provides a bigger risk than the antimatter.

Exponents in previous message.

The first petawatt machines only fired for 10E-15 seconds, for a total of one Joule.

Now the petawatts are reporting 10E-12 seconds, for a total of one thousand Joules.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.