Rapid natural climate change was happening 12,700 years ago, write geoscientists who say they have proved for the first time that an extremely fast climate change happened in Western Europe long before man-made changes in the atmosphere, and is causatively associated with a sudden change in the wind systems.
Achim Brauer, Peter Dulski and Jörg Negendank, (emeritus Professor) from the GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Gerald Haug from the DFG-Leibniz Center for Surface Processes and Climate Studies at the University of Potsdam and the ETH in Zurich, and Daniel Sigman from the Princeton University did the study.
The proof of an extreme cooling within a short number of years 12,700 years ago was attained in sediments of the volcanic lake “Meerfelder Maar” in the Eifel, Germany. The seasonally layered deposits allow to precisely determine the rate of climate change.
Using a combination of microscopic research studies and modern geochemical scanner procedures the scientists were able to successfully reconstruct the climatic conditions even for individual seasons. And so it was particularly the changes in the wind force and direction during the winter half-year, which caused the climate to topple over into a completely different mode within one year after a short instable phase of a few decades.
Up to now scientists assumed that it was the attenuation of the Golf Stream alone that was responsible for the strong cooling in Western Europe. The researchers in this study instead say the examined lake deposits show that the atmospheric circulation, probably in connection with the spreading of sea-ice, played a very important role and these new results also show that the climate system is long not understood, and that especially the mechanisms of short-term change and the time of occurrence still hold many puzzles. Micro-layered lake deposits represent particularly suitable geological archives.
Scientists from the Helmholtz Centre Potsdam – German Research Centre for Geosciences (GFZ) and other institutions are in search of such archives worldwide, so as to also, in the future, obtain area-wide information on the dynamics of climate and possible regional variations.
Article: Achim BRAUER, Gerald H. HAUG, Peter DULSKI, Daniel M. SIGMAN, Jörg F.W. NEGENDANK, "An abrupt wind shift in Western Europe at the onset of the Younger Dryas cold period", Nature Geoscience Nature Geoscience 8, 520 – 523
Comments
Gerhard Adam | 08/04/08 | 12:14 PM
- Reply to This »
- Link
If a "butterfly effect" could change anything, all man's "environmental sins" would have killed 100 percent of life on earth many hundreds of years ago.
Stop getting your science from hollywood. Don't let them choose your world leaders for you also. They don't do either well.
ET
ET (not verified) | 08/05/08 | 09:45 AM
I think you're overstating your case by a fair margin. There is no question that all life changes its environments, by simply existing. This is precisely what gave rise to an atmosphere with an oxygen component. Each change, whether it was climate (i.e. ice ages), meteors, volcanic eruptions, etc. gave rise to significant changes. There have been mass extinctions in the past and, no doubt, will in the future. The most foolish aspect of this, is when people avoid the science and concentrate on blame.
As for 7 billion creatures, we are talking humans, not some non-defined set of species. As I'm sure you know, 7 billion humans is well beyond the capacity of the human species to sustain without significant technological involvement. Therefore, it isn't simply the existence of these "creatures", but their environmental modifications which extend the influence such "creatures" have.
I can't imagine why you would think I get my "science from Hollywood", or what possible effect this would have in my choices for leaders. It seems that the intent here is to avoid science and simply politicize the issue (i.e. the title of the piece conveys no information). That way, apparently we can stop worrying about whether the science is good or bad, and simply revert to name-calling or pushing political agendas.
If there's an argument to be made, then make it. There is no question that volcanic eruptions have had global impacts because of the debris they've expelled. It isn't that complicated to indicate that human activities have also contributed. Is it a small amount, or a large amount? Does it have an impact, or doesn't it? If so, is it measurable or is it something that only a long-term trend can detect? Are there counter-conditions which can negate these influences?
These are questions that can be presented, answered, or researched. They are not served, when a politically motivated title (which only concerns itself with fixing blame) is used.
Gerhard Adam | 08/05/08 | 12:10 PM










