Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By News Staff | October 27th 2008 12:00 AM | 9 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
In November, America will vote for a new President.   The next President, whomever it is, has said he will overturn the restrictions President Bush placed on use of federal money for human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research that does not meet criteria established in 2001.   

The controversy surrounding hESC research is too much to go into here but here are 5 things you should know about the science of stem cell research, including the hESC kind.

1. There are three key areas of stem cell research: embryonic stem cells,  tissue/adult  stem cells and induced pluripotent (or “reprogrammed”) stem cells.   Around the world, these three kinds of stem cells are under intense study for possible treatments for conditions from spinal cord injuries to juvenile diabetes.   Because embryonic stem cell research is unknown territory, scientists and medical researchers hope it could bring new insight into cancer or make it possible to avoid birth defects. 

Much of the controversy has focused on embryonic stem cells.

2. Embryonic stem cells that scientists study come from early-stage embryos.  These embryos are created in fertility clinics for the purpose of fertility treatment. But for a variety of reasons, not all embryos can be used for fertility treatment.   Many of these surplus embryos, which number about 400,000 nationwide, are otherwise discarded.

The cells scientists use come from embryos just five days after fertilization. Embryos at this stage, called blastocysts, are spheres containing about 100 cells that have not yet differentiated into more specialized cells. If some of these cells are placed in a lab dish in the right conditions, they can become stem cell lines that can be maintained indefinitely in an undifferentiated state, or guided to become specific types of cells. 

Scientists want to use these embryonic cells because they have the capacity to turn into any of the 200 cell types in the body. These “master cells” promise to provide large enough quantities of specialized nerve, pancreas or other cells to effectively help patients whose own cells are not functioning.

Scientists in most states are allowed to use embryos from these clinics to create stem cell lines and develop disease therapies in their laboratories. 

3. Adult stem cells have had a lot of success also.   'Adult' stem cells does not mean they are only in adults or even just in children; they are also present in developing fetuses.   They are more specialized cells that arise from embryonic stem cells. Also known as tissue-specific stem cells, they have the ability to make one or two kinds of cells, such as blood and immune system cells, brain or muscle cells. Adult stem cells have a more limited capacity to replace themselves than do embryonic stem cells.

Decades of work with adult blood stem cells have led to successful bone marrow transplant treatments that are used today to treat people who have leukemia, lymphoma and some inherited blood disorders. Today, blood stem cells can often be isolated from the blood rather than bone marrow. 

Although scientists continue to try to expand the use of adult stem cells, so far it has been very difficult to get many types of adult stem cells to reproduce in sufficient amounts to lead to effective treatments.

4. Induced pluripotent stem cells, or iPS cells, are adult cells reprogrammed to behave like embryonic stem cells.   Recently, Japanese and American scientists have developed a third type of stem cell, which are skin cells that have been 'reprogrammed' to be similar to embryonic stem cells. 

These induced pluripotent cells (iPS) are reprogrammed using viruses, which may predispose those cells to cancer.  To date, none of the reprogrammed lines that have been used in patients.   iPS cells are an exciting discovery but it is unknown whether the reprogrammed cells can function the way embryonic stem cells do.

5. In 2001, President George W. Bush announced that federal funds may be awarded for research using human embryonic stem cells that meet approved criteria.    Bush was the first President to fund embryonic stem cell research.  

 - The derivation process (which begins with the destruction of the embryo) was initiated prior to 9:00 P.M. EDT on August 9, 2001.
 
- The stem cells must have been derived from an embryo that was created for reproductive purposes and was no longer needed. 

- Informed consent must have been obtained for the donation of the embryo and that donation must not have involved financial inducements.


 State and private companies not using federal funds are exempt from these restrictions.

The National Institutes of Health (NIH), as the Federal government's leading biomedical research organization, implements the President's policy. The NIH funds research scientists to conduct research on existing human embryonic stem cells and to explore the enormous promise of these unique cells, including their potential to produce breakthrough therapies and cures.

Investigators from 14 laboratories in the United States, India, Israel, Singapore, Sweden, and South Korea have derived stem cells from 71 individual, genetically diverse blastocysts. These derivations meet the President's criteria for use in federally funded human embryonic stem cell research. The NIH has consulted with each of the investigators who have derived these cells. These scientists are working with the NIH and the research community to establish a research infrastructure to ensure the successful handling and the use of these cells in the laboratory.



Sean Morrison outlines several key facts that citizens can keep in mind as they navigate through a flood of often conflicting information about stem cell research. Courtesy: University of Michigan Health System

Comments

Whatever happens in the near term, one thing you can bet on long term is that embryonic stem cells will eventually be unecessary. The only thing moral objections are doing short term is stalling the research, immoral in and of itself. Stupidity marches on.

our economy is in the tank, embryonic stem cell research is horrendously expensive and has not produced a single cure yet for any human disease. Adult stem cells have already been proven to work miracles in numerous previously incurable conditions. If scientists have any brains, they will pursue adult stem cell research, if only for the more immediate impact to medical technology. But they won't because they want to have their own personal embryonic stem cell lines, which they can patent and gives them more money to fool around with.

umm your wrong about that, do some more research and you'll find a little boy with epilepsy in a vegatative state becasue his brain would not stop haiving seizures. he had only months to live. one treatment of stem cells and the boy no longer has epilepsy. he is walking now and talking. it's a blessing to know there is a cure for something the world thought was incurable.

"Adult stem cells work as well or better than embryonic stem cells."

This false argument is perpetuated out of a values system political or religious. Since embyronic stem cell research has been so limited it is impossible to to say whether or not it is more or less promising than adult stem cells. I do know that one problem with adult stem cells is that if they are from a patient being treated for a genetic condition they will carry the same genetic dysfunctions, like juvenile diabetes or osteogenesis imperfecta.

Embryonic stem cells are Tabala Rosseau while adult stem cells are largely limited to the type of tissue from whence they originated.

For anyone to say, especially at this stage of research, that adult stem cells successes prove they were right all along then that is evidence they had special and specific knowledge cell researchers did not. Where are these brilliant minds?

Hank's picture
"Adult stem cells work as well or better than embryonic stem cells."

I didn't see that in the article or in the comments.  Or was that the crazy guy who wrote the same comment 10 times and got deleted?  

I don't think anyone in science says they do the same thing.   What is in study is what each can do best.

However, adult stem cells do a lot.   Resetting the immune system to reverse early stage MS and Study: Stem Cells Reverse Paralysis in Rats are both adult stem cell breakthroughs just today.



adaptivecomplexity's picture
Embryonic stem cells are Tabala Rosseau while adult stem cells are
largely limited to the type of tissue from whence they originated.

That's the key to why embryonic stem cells have been so important. We're now reaching the point where we can reprogram non-stem cells like fibroblasts into a variety of stem cell types (known as induced pluripotent stem cells), but the understanding that lead to this reprogramming ability has come through embryonic stem cell research. Embryonic stem cell research in mice has been extremely fruitful.

Another challenge with adult stem cells has been isolating them. Some adult stem cells are easy to access (such as blood stem cells in bone marrow), but fully differentiated stem cells from many other tissues like  brain tissue are much more difficult to isolate.

My 2 year old daughter became sick in September. She went down for a nap one day and woke up an hour and a half later paralyzed in her arms. As the day went on she lost control of her legs and eventually lost the ability to breathe on her own. She was diagnosed with Transverse Myelitis, a disease that injures the Myelin sheath around the spinal cord. We are not sure if she will be able to regain the ability to walk and /or the use of her hands and arms. She is still dependent on a ventilator to breathe. Screw morality. Try walking in our shoes for a while then you might be able to judge the use of embryonic stem cells. If they could help our daughter, GO FOR IT!

stem cell may cause so much.. but they worked.. Scientist from China have cured a lot of people using their stem cells program... look it up!

Hank's picture
You need to distinguish between adult and embryonic stem cells.  And what has been cured?

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.