The University of Leicester’s School of Management wonders if more religious control of banks might have lessened the impact of the global financial crisis.
Buying into the notion that a 'sub-prime' housing market led to the latest global financial crisis, they say developing new practices which can address the issues that led the world to the brink of collapse are a vital part of recovery.
Professor Martin Parker, Director of Research for the Management School, thinks a banking system consistent with the principles of Islamic law (Sharia) may be a solution so the university is hosting a conference to consider potential lessons from the Islamic Banking and Finance sector.
What would that mean? Concepts like term loans that return interest to banks would be forbidden and banks would be forbidden from investing in companies contrary to Fiqh al-Muamalat - Islamic rules on transactions.
Parker says, “It is important for everyone’s future that we study the current crisis in order that more sustainable financial practices can be developed. This conference is a contribution to that project.”
Unlike Christianity, Muslim countries and financial institutions are able to gather and ally using religious precepts without criticism from western political groups so Islamic banking has grown each year and exists in all 'Muslim' countries, including ones considered Christian. There's even a World Islamic Banking Conference, held annually in Bahrain each year since 1994.
Imagine the outrage in the U.S.A. if a Christian Banking Conference were held with government sponsorship and endorsements.
Despite the societal concerns of a fundamentalist approach to getting a mortgage for your home, the University of Leicester’s School of Management is hosting a conference to consider potential lessons from the Islamic Banking and Finance sector.
The conference, to be held on 2nd and 3rd July, will consider topics such as:
· Are Islamic banks more resilient than the secular/government ones in the west?
· Would the principle in Islamic banking that the transaction be free from interest and backed up by a tangible asset make it more robust than secular/government banks?
· Will globalization make the Islamic system vulnerable?
· Does the obligation of Islamic Financial Institutions on transparency make it less vulnerable ? Well, it isn't all that transparent. Islamic banks don't loan the buyer money to purchase a house, because that is against sharia, and instead the bank buys it and sells it to the buyer at a profit and lets the buyer pay in installments - but they can't call it a profit.
True, mark-to-market rules cannot apply and write downs won't occur, causing a false problem, if no one actually knows what a house is worth, since the buying price is set by the bank, but that isn't more transparent.
Not on the docket; will you be able to get a loan if you are not Muslim? And the IOR (Instituto
per le Opere di Religione), better known as the 'Vatican Bank', does pretty well too. It's unclear if Christian- and Jewish-controlled banks will get equal time in Leicester.
Conference coordinator, Dr Ibrahim Umar, said “This is an opportunity for economists, business practitioners, Islamic scholars, and private industries such as banking and insurance to come together to consider whether we can learn lessons from the Islamic system and, if so, what benefits might be achieved. It also gives us the opportunity to consider what potential situations or factors may have a detrimental effect in the future. The conference is open to both academics and practitioners. I hope that anyone who has something to add to the debate will attend.”
To reserve a place at the event, email Ann Byrom, ulsmtemp1 (at) leicester.ac.uk, for further details.
Comments
what Professor Martin Parker, Director of Research for the Management School, had told is absolutely right. Islamic banking is a good model of banking through which we can control the economic crisis to a large extent.
Alternative finance (not verified) | 06/20/09 | 14:57 PM
- Reply to This »
- Link
...so what does an Islamic bank *do*? Just house money?
Many religions forbid money-lending, but that's what economies are built upon. The whole economy can be viewed as a very efficient means of lending money. How else would you get large sums of capital to where they're most needed? The loans differ in qualities such as size, factors affecting risk of default,&payoffs to either party. Without money lending, a few fat cats would just sit on large sums of money, b/c there's no where for them to place it. On the contrary, one of the remarkable things about the modern economy is that for the first era in history, the middle class combined has more money than the upper class.
I'm sure Islamic banks would outperform "secular" banks during a recession, but only insofar as any non-bank entity would as well. I could put my income under my mattress, call it Kerrjac bank, & I'd also be outperforming many banks. If I could convince my brokerage to allow me to buy $5 billion worth of GM stocks on margin, & then lose it all, I'd be outperforming Merill Lynch.
The beautiful thing about most of the non-Islamic world is that people are free to start whatever sort of bank they want. But having gov't restrict banks from, essentially, preforming the act of banking is a form of tyranny.
Many religions forbid money-lending, but that's what economies are built upon. The whole economy can be viewed as a very efficient means of lending money. How else would you get large sums of capital to where they're most needed? The loans differ in qualities such as size, factors affecting risk of default,&payoffs to either party. Without money lending, a few fat cats would just sit on large sums of money, b/c there's no where for them to place it. On the contrary, one of the remarkable things about the modern economy is that for the first era in history, the middle class combined has more money than the upper class.
I'm sure Islamic banks would outperform "secular" banks during a recession, but only insofar as any non-bank entity would as well. I could put my income under my mattress, call it Kerrjac bank, & I'd also be outperforming many banks. If I could convince my brokerage to allow me to buy $5 billion worth of GM stocks on margin, & then lose it all, I'd be outperforming Merill Lynch.
The beautiful thing about most of the non-Islamic world is that people are free to start whatever sort of bank they want. But having gov't restrict banks from, essentially, preforming the act of banking is a form of tyranny.
kerr jac | 06/20/09 | 21:51 PM
Steve Davis | 06/20/09 | 23:44 PM
Banking should not be tied to religion in anyway. There will always be a conflict of interest. For example, should depositor money be used to further the goals of the church - regardless of risk to depositors? Will generous donors to the church receive favorable treatment compared to those who chose not to donate? I am not saying that conventioal banking is perfect, but giving any religious group power over a nation's money is risky business.
Bill Banks (not verified) | 06/29/09 | 21:31 PM
You had better think more about survival at a biological level. Money is simply a medium of exchange for needed goods; it is not in itself a "needed commodity." We need to keep religion out of everything that is not private. The aggressive religious right have infiltrated almost every aspect of our lives. And have you noticed how Christianity props up the ruling classes 'round the world? Many officials live in absolute splendor while the masses live in poverty. If they were truly religious, they could not do this.
I am appalled that they are not appalled.
I am appalled that they are not appalled.
Amanda Wonders (not verified) | 08/28/09 | 16:25 PM








