It takes two to reproductively tango for humans but even when plants (or animals) can self-fertilize their offspring have longer lives when a mate is involved in the process, according to over 100 mini-evolution experiments involving nematode worms (Caenorhabditis elegans) at the University of Oregon. Going it alone increases susceptibility to genetic mutations and reduces that adaptability to changing environments, says their report in Nature.
Sex with self in the animal and plant world is known as 'selfing'. Offspring born from selfing share all of their genes in common with their parent, and each is capable of producing another generation of offspring. Offspring from outcrossing share 50-percent of each parent's genes, and some are born males incapable of bearing offspring.
Selfing populations don't have to deal with pesky males for reproduction and because males do not produce offspring of their own, selfing populations avoid what biologists call "the evolutionary cost of males," which allows them to increase in size at twice the rate of out-crossing populations. In fact, says UO biology professor Patrick C. Phillips, "biologists going all the way back to Charles Darwin have been puzzled why sexual reproduction via outcrossing exists at all."
Graduate student Levi T. Morran and Michelle D. Parmenter, an undergraduate student from Eugene, conducted more than 100 trials in which populations of nematodes -- also known as roundworms -- were adapted to new environments, including to the presence of a bacterial pathogen that eats the worms from the inside out. The students, under Patrick's guidance, genetically engineered the worms, which normally practice a combination of both selfing and outcrossing, to reproduce either just by selfing or just by outcrossing.
They tracked the evolution of 60 different populations for 50 generations under different combinations of mutation, mating system and genetic background.
They found that purely selfing populations were much more susceptible to accumulating harmful mutations and were not able adapt to rapidly changing environments. Traditional thinking has suggested that selfing populations are able to purge many of these mutations, but this study found that the ability to sufficiently purge was overwhelmed by slight increases in mutation rates. That, in turn, threatens the long-term survival of selfing roundworms.
"The inability of selfing populations to adapt to changing environmental conditions helps to explain the observation that selfing populations are much more likely to go extinct than outcrossing populations," said Morran, who was the study's lead author.
While males may be problematic for a wide variety of reasons, from an evolutionary point of view, their benefits outweigh their costs, which helps to explain why having sex with others is the rule rather than the exception within natural populations, Phillips said.
"Many scientists have argued that outcrossing has evolved to avoid the genetic consequences of inbreeding, while others have emphasized the role that outcrossing plays in generating the genetic variation necessary for evolutionary change," he added. "Our work shows that both of these factors are important."
Three grants from the National Science Foundation helped support the research. Morran also was funded by a National Institutes of Health genetics fellowship. Morran, Parmenter and Phillips were coauthors of the paper.
Track your comments!
[x]
When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!










As for males not producing offspring, this is a clear evolutionary advantage to a species (mostly in "higher" animals) because it provides a significant "back-up" mechanism, since it provides a buffer mechanism to improve the survivability of females. In addition, it ensures that even during population stresses, very few males are needed to ensure the possibility of viable female reproduction (since they incur little or no cost to impregnating as many females as possible). It's a good scenario since it avoids placing too much dependency on any one element of a species' reproductive capacity.
Any species that is too successful at reproduction risks exceeding the capacity of its environment, so even eusocial insects may have evolved so that few males exist around the nest, while the "buffer" zone is dominated by non-reproductive females. This ensures that a viable replacement is available in the event reproduction is threatened, but doesn't allow the excess of too many females overrunning (and over-competing) with others.
While the gene-centric view tends to over-emphasize selfishness and views everything at the "personal" survival level, in reality, many species lack any ability to survive on their own and therefore a stable population must be maintained in order for the individual to survive. Therefore, while it is not quite the same as group selection, it is a necessary adaptation since there are no viable single animals.