Drugs and radiotherapy given for cancer can cause unpleasant side effects such as nausea and vomiting, mouth sores, dermatitis, and menopausal symptoms. Around a third of patients with cancer use complementary therapies, including homeopathic medicines, to try to reduce these side effects. In a systematic review of randomised controlled trials, Cochrane Researchers examined recent evidence for the safety and effectiveness of homeopathic medicines used in this way.
The review included eight studies involving a total of 664 participants. One study with 256 participants found that skin irritation caused by radiotherapy was less in patients using calendula ointment compared with those using the topical agent trolamine. In another study of 32 participants, those who took Traumeel S (a combination of 14 homeopathic medicines) had more relief from mouth sores caused by chemotherapy than those who took placebo. Two small studies on adverse effects of radiotherapy were positive but may have been biased, and two small studies on adverse effects of chemotherapy did not show any positive effects.
"We found preliminary data that suggest there may be benefit associated with two homeopathic medicines in specific circumstances, although these results need to be replicated in further studies," says Dr Sosie Kassab, Director of the Royal London Homoeopathic Hospital's Complementary Cancer Service and lead author of the review. "The effects of calendula may also depend on the formulation, as it can be prepared using a range of different methods."
Two other studies tested homeopathic medicines for relieving menopausal symptoms caused by breast cancer therapies. However, the researchers found no evidence in these studies for any benefit over placebo.
None of the homeopathic medicines studied reported serious side effects or interactions with conventional treatments.
"At present, there is no convincing evidence to support the use of homeopathic medicines for other adverse effects of cancer treatments," says Kassab. "But very little research has been undertaken and more is required."
Comments
Hey, we published a release on water memory once too. Putting up a homeopathy piece on a science site is like throwing rabbits in front of greyhounds; good to get some exercise but we don't want to make a habit of it.
Lee Silver did one of his subtle crushing pieces on this back in the day too. But the images are gone, so he must have hotlinked to them from site other site. This is why I tell people to upload them locally and then link. We can never go out of business.
Lee Silver did one of his subtle crushing pieces on this back in the day too. But the images are gone, so he must have hotlinked to them from site other site. This is why I tell people to upload them locally and then link. We can never go out of business.
Hank Campbell | 04/15/09 | 11:17 AM
Is it right that our lives witouth water equels death ? In fact everything is alive because of water .Homepathic remedies are made of real materials which are diluted by means of water or water and alcolhol .I have experienced their effectiveness on myself ,my wife ,my father and so many other patients .They really work .In cancerous patients who have taken chemotherapy and or radiotherapy ,Arnica has very good healing effects .
Best Wishes ,Dr.Sadeghi
drsadeghi (not verified) | 04/16/09 | 01:33 AM
The fact that water (like oxygen, nitrogen, phosphorous, a variety of trace metals, etc.) is irrelevant. The materials going into homeopathic remedies are real, but the method of action is not. Believing that solutions that are so dilute that no molecules of the original compound remain is inconsistent with all knowledge of physics and chemistry. I suggest that you peruse iTunes U for several excellent (and free) courses on basic physics and chemistry from places like Stanford&MIT so that you might understand the implausibility of homeopathic remedies before you treat any more patients.
You personal experiences, occurring outside a controlled test, are anecdotes, do not constitute scientific evidence, and are completely consistent with the placebo effect.
You personal experiences, occurring outside a controlled test, are anecdotes, do not constitute scientific evidence, and are completely consistent with the placebo effect.
Josh Witten | 04/16/09 | 08:51 AM
Professor Edzard Ernst of Exeter University has offered $16,000 to anyone who can show homeopathy is better than a placebo in a controlled trial.
Hank Campbell | 04/17/09 | 13:01 PM
yours truly,
Debby
Debby Bruck (not verified) | 04/17/09 | 13:30 PM
So, please - live with your limited perspective of understanding,
limited boundaries of what explains healing, limited instruments of
measurement and let the homeopaths and people who have come to love
homeopathy through their own healing live in peace.
Hmmm. . .no. At least, not while NCCAM is using my tax dollars to fund homeopathy research. I can only imagine my criticism getting more justified (and self-righteous) if the US moves to more universal health care. Not to mention my ethical obligation to inform people of the actually efficacy of the treatments they are pursuing.
I'm afraid that this point of view in some way negates the HUMAN
factor. Negates that people have thoughts, feelings, responses and
experiences that are a complicated intricate evolution of their history
and life experiences, rather that a simple answer.
This uniqueness of individuals human trope is very common in alternative medicine. It both plays well to our egos and the lack of scientific evidence to support alternative modalities. The conclusion from your "human factor" theory is that we should not observe widespread, effective use of non-individualized treatments. Unfortunately, we do.
My question to you is simple: What evidence would convince you that homeopathy does not work?
Second question (which is related in convoluted way): How do you know that I am not God?
Josh Witten | 04/17/09 | 15:18 PM
In our generation, the knowledge and wisdom of centuries documentation by homeopathic physicians and healers will be known and accepted as truth.
As more of the general population explore alternatives and find homeopathic remedies work in both acute and chronic conditions, they will be motivated to study the principles of homeopathy and seek out experts who have devoted their life to this healing system.
http://homeopathyworldcommunity.com
Debby (not verified) | 04/14/09 | 23:40 PM
You should explain the concept of "homeopathic provings." This is not the same as scientific proof. Provings are list of symptoms induced by exposure to a compound, based on homeopathy's "Law of Similars" (i.e., like cures like). The Materia Medica is not accumulated clinical evidence of effectiveness of homeopathic remedies nor tests of homeopathy's underlying theory. In some cases, the law of similars can be dangerous. For example, the food allergy "remedy" Allertherapy contains as many or more peanut particles as peanut oil.
The potential pharmacological properties of calendula is secondary. Homeopathic remedies are highly dilute, often to the degree that it is highly unlikely that a single molecule of the putatively therapeutic compound remains in the remedy. Homeopathy believes that these serial dilutions increase the potency of the remedy, contravening all known science.
Here are some alternate information links: http://www.homeowatch.org/&http://www.whatstheharm.net/homeopathy.html
The potential pharmacological properties of calendula is secondary. Homeopathic remedies are highly dilute, often to the degree that it is highly unlikely that a single molecule of the putatively therapeutic compound remains in the remedy. Homeopathy believes that these serial dilutions increase the potency of the remedy, contravening all known science.
Here are some alternate information links: http://www.homeowatch.org/&http://www.whatstheharm.net/homeopathy.html
Josh Witten | 04/15/09 | 09:12 AM
Patrick Lockerby | 04/17/09 | 13:25 PM
may you have peace
Debby Bruck (not verified) | 04/17/09 | 13:51 PM
You're an advocate so you have to highlight the good and ignore the bad. Obviously we posted details of the study here because it's a discussion point. The fact remains there are no legitimate trials showing a benefit greater than a placebo for 'energetic imprints' used in medicine.
Anecdotal evidence is akin to the sports betting services I mentioned as an analogy - that don't make it science.
Anecdotal evidence is akin to the sports betting services I mentioned as an analogy - that don't make it science.
Hank Campbell | 04/17/09 | 15:06 PM
Patrick Lockerby | 04/17/09 | 15:27 PM











Probably because homeopathic "medicines" are just water.