Speculation continues about the crash of Air France jetliner flight 447 on its transatlantic journey. A University of Indianapolis international relations expert says recent events point to the possibility of terrorism.
Although there have been no claims of responsibility or specific indications of sabotage, the disappearance of a large airliner without warning is extremely rare and investigators say no potential causes have been ruled out. Today, aviation authorities revealed another Air France flight from Buenos Aires to Paris was grounded temporarily May 27 because of a telephoned bomb threat.
The circumstantial evidence for terrorism, according to Douglas Woodwell, assistant professor of international relations at the University of Indianapolis, includes a history of Islamic extremism in and around Brazil, where the flight originated, as well as the recent opening of a French military base on the Arabian Peninsula.
But Brazilian Defense Minister Nelson Jobim said the existence of large fuel stains in the water likely ruled out an explosion, making a bomb attack less likely.
“During the past week, the French government announced the landmark opening of a military base in Dubai, the first permanent overseas military base the French have opened since they decolonized in the early 1960s,” Woodwell says. “The fact that the United States had stationed troops on the Arabian Peninsula during and after the Gulf War was probably the most important concrete factor motivating Al Qaeda in its subsequent attacks on the United States, including 9/11. The French basing agreement was announced on January 15, which is sufficient time for Al Qaeda sympathizers to organize a response.”
Who are the Al Qaeda sympathizers in South America? According to Woodwell, the so-called Tri-border region where Brazil, Argentina and Paraguay meet is home to a large Muslim population with a history of militancy.
“Terrorists from this area are believed to have launched attacks against the Israeli Embassy and a Jewish community center in Argentina in the early ‘90s, killing hundreds of people,” he says. “Radical groups recruiting amid this often-alienated Muslim diaspora would have no problem finding young men or women willing to bring down an airliner.”
Comments
Flight Guy (not verified) | 06/04/09 | 07:50 AM
- Reply to This »
- Link
ldb (not verified) | 06/08/09 | 16:19 PM
How about the severe weather the plane was flying through? With 100 mph updrafts in a thunderstorm, I don't think terrorism would be my first choice of causes.
This is precisely the kinds of speculation that create an atmosphere of fear and confusion among people and serves no useful purpose. Until the information regarding the circumstances of the crash is available, this professor's opinion is no more valuable than the idle talk between neighbors. It's simply irresponsible chatter.
This is precisely the kinds of speculation that create an atmosphere of fear and confusion among people and serves no useful purpose. Until the information regarding the circumstances of the crash is available, this professor's opinion is no more valuable than the idle talk between neighbors. It's simply irresponsible chatter.
Gerhard Adam | 06/04/09 | 08:22 AM
Assistant Professor Woodwell isn't exactly a world renowned expert on terrorism. While his argument that a French base in the UAE might be motivation, I would suspect that the 1979 raid by French GIGN special forces of the mosque in Mecca, Saudi Arabia, would be a more powerful motivation for al-Qaeda and affiliates. And to date, the 1979 raid has barely been mentioned in jihadi circles. Moreover, the networks of 'al-Qaeda sympathizers' he references in the Tri-Border region have been proven to be marginal at best and primarily focused on facilitation--not attacks. On the other hand he may be erroneously referring to Hizballah operatives who likely were behind the bombings in Argentina in 1994 as al-Qaeda 'sympathizers'--which is ludicrous on so many levels.
Either way, Assistant Professor Woodwell's comments are not constructive and he is doing a terrible disservice as a researcher to readers, his students, and the public debate by not producing considered and objective expertise on the situation. These comments should be an embarrassment to the University of Indianapolis as they amount to nothing more than self-serving, uneducated fear mongering.
Anonymous (not verified) | 06/04/09 | 16:40 PM
The circumstantial evidence for terrorism, according to Douglas Woodwell, assistant professor of international relations at the University of Indianapolis, includes a history of Islamic extremism in and around Brazil, where the flight originated, as well as the recent opening of a French military base on the Arabian Peninsula.
Post hoc ergo propter hoc?
There have been many instances of planes disintegrating in the air due to e.g. instrument/electronics/structural failures, as against relatively few instances of deliberate sabotage. Airliners are not designed for aerobatics, which means that any excessively sudden change of attitude - especially in pitch or yaw - such as may occur in extremely violent weather, can be catastrophic.
Patrick Lockerby | 06/04/09 | 16:57 PM
Anonymous (not verified) | 06/17/09 | 15:44 PM
There is no proof the passengers are not trapped in an Arctic fortress where Hitler and his alien overlords are using them as slave labor in their plot to create the Fourth Reich - this does not make it likely.
In that same thinking water, being an incompressible fluid, does not forgive much when hitting it at high speeds. So in the absence of the supernatural, we have to go with what is likely.
In that same thinking water, being an incompressible fluid, does not forgive much when hitting it at high speeds. So in the absence of the supernatural, we have to go with what is likely.
Hank Campbell | 06/17/09 | 15:56 PM
What proof do you have planes have disintigrated?
Newspaper archives, the FAA archives and many web sites document the entire hitory of aviation and accidents. Try this web site for just a few examples:
http://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/Accident_and_Serious_Incident_Reports...
Patrick Lockerby | 06/17/09 | 16:00 PM
While the professors points are of no particular use, beside spreading fear and speculation, I think it would also be wise to examine "who" asked him his opinion in the first place? Why? Did "they" then run with the story for the sake of the story? (Fear sells)
Finally, why run the story here?
Isn't this the smartest blog on the net?
Finally, why run the story here?
Isn't this the smartest blog on the net?
Brian Taylor | 06/04/09 | 17:26 PM
Our audience and contributors are not exactly the kind to get riled up about speculation. If someone is saying something interesting, and it looks worth talking about, why not talk about it? If he's a crank, a smart audience will let him know. Heck, I did an article on David Carradine today and I have never been able to figure out what your stuff is about but I know it isn't science. :)
Hank Campbell | 06/04/09 | 17:48 PM
Brian Taylor | 06/04/09 | 17:59 PM
I don't know what my stuff is about either...
I'd be happy to explain it to you, for a suitable fee. :-)
Hank: it's called 'philosophy'. I love it. It may be arcane, it may be abstruse1, but it has been endorsed as a worthy pastime by some of history's most brilliant minds.
[1] - not to be confused with deliberate abstrusion, an infantile art indulged in only by statesmen and British politicians.
Patrick Lockerby | 06/04/09 | 18:32 PM
French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner, speaking Thursday in Rio de Janeiro where he attended a Mass honoring the crash victims
I don't think it's terribly moral to let people in France, where they have a huge Muslim population, be concerned about it by not disregarding it.
said experts had not found signs that would back up a "terrorism theory."
"But we cannot discard that for now," he told reporters. "Nothing leads us to believe that there was an explosion, but that doesn't mean there wasn't one."
"All the paths are open and we will not give priority to a single premise because that would be immoral," he added.
I don't think it's terribly moral to let people in France, where they have a huge Muslim population, be concerned about it by not disregarding it.
Hank Campbell | 06/05/09 | 19:00 PM
Phil (not verified) | 06/09/09 | 00:57 AM
News just came out today, June 10th 2009, that 2 passengers on board Flight 447 were suspected Islamic terrorists. Hmm...
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/20090610/islamic-terrorists-were-air-france-flight-447.htm
I am a proponent of Professor Woodwell’s hypothesis; I’ve suspected a terrorism link from day one. Several bloggers on this thread who previously lambasted the professor should prepare to recant their feedback. His speculation may be closer to the truth than you think. Stay tuned.
Tom Fox | 06/10/09 | 10:17 AM
More accurately, the two names may be the names of terrorists, or may be entirely coincidental.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,525642,00.html
The facts so far show that the plane was flying through black storm cloud. Shortly afterwards the ACARS, or Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System stopped sending. Its last reports included these messages:
221002006AUTO FLT AP OFF > the autopilot was turned off
341040006NAV ADR DISAGREE > air speed indicators show conflicting values
213100206ADVISORY > cabin pressure lost.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,525642,00.html
The facts so far show that the plane was flying through black storm cloud. Shortly afterwards the ACARS, or Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System stopped sending. Its last reports included these messages:
221002006AUTO FLT AP OFF > the autopilot was turned off
341040006NAV ADR DISAGREE > air speed indicators show conflicting values
213100206ADVISORY > cabin pressure lost.
Patrick Lockerby | 06/10/09 | 10:56 AM
The French are in a tough spot. If it's Air France maintenance, that makes France look bad. If it's Airbus, that makes the EU's national, subsidized manufacturer (in France) look bad and if it's terrorism, that makes France, a country perceived as soft on terrorism, look bad.
'Macabre coincidence' in the way of similar names is the best thing that can happen for them.
'Macabre coincidence' in the way of similar names is the best thing that can happen for them.
Hank Campbell | 06/10/09 | 22:08 PM








