Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By News Staff | October 3rd 2007 10:35 AM | 3 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
Einstein's Theory Of General Relativity has been under assault for the better part of a century. No one can really prove it wrong but it's commonly assumed to be wrong.

Sergei Kopeikin, associate professor of physics and astronomy at University of Missouri-Columbia, has spent the last five years defending Einstein's prediction that gravity moves at the speed of light - they want to prove Einstein right and they say they can measure the speed of propagation of tiny ripples of space-time known as gravitational waves.

He says his paper, "Gravimagnetism, causality, and aberration of gravity in the gravitational light-ray deflection experiments" published along with Edward Fomalont from the National Radio Astronomical Observatory, arrives at a consensus in the continuing debate that has divided the scientific community.



The experiment conducted by Kopeikin and Edward Fomalont five years ago found that the gravity force of Jupiter and light travel at the same speed, which validates Einstein's suggestion that gravity and electromagnetic field properties, are governed by the same principle of special relativity with a single fundamental speed.

In observing the gravitational deflection of light caused by motion of Jupiter in space, Kopeikin concluded that mass currents cause non-stationary gravimagnetic fields to form in accordance with Einstein's point of view.

Einstein believed that in order to measure any property of gravity, one has to use test particles. “By observing the motion of the particles under influence of the gravity force, one can then extract properties of the gravitational field,” Kopeikin said. “Particles without mass – such as photons – are particularly useful because they always propagate with constant speed of light irrespectively of the reference frame used for observations.”

The property of gravity tested in the experiment with Jupiter also is called causality. Causality denotes the relationship between one event (cause) and another event (effect), which is the consequence (result) of the first. In the case of the speed of gravity experiment, the cause is the event of the gravitational perturbation of photon by Jupiter, and the effect is the event of detection of this gravitational perturbation by an observer. The two events are separated by a certain interval of time which can be measured as Jupiter moves, and compared with an independently-measured interval of time taken by photon to propagate from Jupiter to the observer. The experiment found that two intervals of time for gravity and light coincide up to 20 percent. Therefore, the gravitational field cannot act faster than light propagates.”

Other physicists argue that the Fomalont-Kopeikin experiment measured nothing else but the speed of light. “This point of view stems from the belief that the time-dependent perturbation of the gravitational field of a uniformly moving Jupiter is too small to detect,” Kopeikin said. “However, our research article clearly demonstrates that this belief is based on insufficient mathematical exploration of the rich nature of the Einstein field equations and a misunderstanding of the physical laws of interaction of light and gravity in curved space-time.”

- University of Missouri-Columbia

Comments

Gary Herstein's picture
Hello, I feel compelled to express astonishment over the statement early in the article regarding GR (General Relativity) that it is "commonly assumed to be wrong." At the best, this is an unhappy choice of words; at worst, it is stuff and nonsense. Within my admittedly finite survey of the subject, the overwhelming consensus amongst physicists is an unquestioning acceptance of GR in its broad strokes (at least) is so common that to even mention the possibility of an alternative is met with astonishment. Moreover, the idea that a scientific theory of any stripe is ever "proven correct" is a bit of a "howler." One need not be a dogmatic Popperian to still recognize that a genuinely scientific theory never goes further than surviving an attempt at falsification (and the provision of a model that satisfies the empirical data and aesthetic concerns in an arguably superior manner). Finally, this article might have been significantly improved by citing even a single instance of someone in the physics community claiming that gravity has a speed in vacuum other than c. Perhaps I've missed this in the literature; if someone has a citation in the peer-reviewed literature to anyone who challenges this, I'd appreciate it if they'd post it. The challenges to GR -- which comprise a vanishingly small minority of the physics community -- as a rule rotate around the "monometric" nature of Einstein's theory; i.e., his collapsing space into gravity in his single tensor gmn. Both MoND (Modified Newtonian Dynamic) theories and the more general class of bimetric theories (theories which retain a separate tensor for space/light and gravity) differ on this point. (And, OT, how do I end a subscript w/o resorting to a superscript?) Cheers, y'all
Hank's picture
If you used < sub > to start it use < /sub > to end it. Except put the <> closer. Since html works in comments it wouldn't show up if I did it the correct way.

P.S. And feel free to write physics articles and use whatever verbage you want.

Gary Herstein's picture
Thanks, I knew it was something simple -- but for my life, I could not remember what!

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.